Re: Security hole in kernel fixed?

2024-05-15 Thread Stanislav Vlasov
ср, 15 мая 2024 г. в 16:55, Hans : > Dear developers, Users. > in April 2024 the security hole CVE-2023-6546 was discovered in linux-image, > and I believe, it is fixed in kernel 6.1.0 (from debian/stable) as soon after > this a new kernel was released.

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

2024-05-15 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 15 May 2024 20:40 +0100, from pior...@gmx.com (piorunz): > I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable: > > segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080 You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I

Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

2024-05-15 Thread piorunz
Hello, I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable: segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080 It throws a lot of errors related to AMD GPU every day. I also experienced full desktop hang, where I had to restart

Re: Markup in mail messages

2024-05-15 Thread David
On Wed, 2024-05-15 at 15:57 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > On 15/05/2024 03:17, Max Nikulin wrote: > > > On 15/05/2024 02:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > > > > > > > Messages in

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread gene heskett
On 5/15/24 10:50, Nicolas George wrote: Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): PS Afterthought is that email signatures are another of that widely accepted netiquette set of standards. You can add the “Re: ” to that list. It is the sequence of four octets 0x52, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x20, and nothing else.

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 5/15/24 6:46 AM, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: . . . No its not, its your refusal to use the down arrow in your reply editor to put your reply after the question. It really is that simple. If your choice of email agents cannot do that, its time to switch to an agent that can. There are dozens of

deboguer un programme (libre GPLv3+) qui utilise un greffon qui utilise GTKmm4 et plante

2024-05-15 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Bonjour la liste Sous Debian en x86-64. S'il existe un dépôt Debian testing (ou unstable) qui contienne que des fichiers ELF avec les information DWARF  de débogging (çàd un Debian dont les fichiers ELF executables ou bibliothèques sont majoritairement compilés avec gcc -O2 -g ou g++ -O2 -g)

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Henning Follmann
Since my request started this offtopic subthread I hope I can put it to rest. Yes I requested to not toppost. I asked politely, and I added pertinent response on topic. I do not claim to be right or wrong about this. I prefer interleaved style for reason. Everyone on this list heard all arguments

Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail

2024-05-15 Thread Max Nikulin
On 07/05/2024 23:24, Max Nikulin wrote: On 2024-05-06 17:04, Max Nikulin wrote: So doubled backslashes (as in .desktop files) are correct. What is wrong is lack of backslashes added before ";" and it is a bug. I have filed https://bugs.debian.org/1071036 update-mime does not escape semicolon

Re: Markup in mail messages

2024-05-15 Thread Darac Marjal
On 15/05/2024 03:17, Max Nikulin wrote: On 15/05/2024 02:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: Messages in Markdown in the Windows world? I have never seen it. [...] The only sensible interpretation I can come up with for why these asterisks

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Nicolas George
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): > PS Afterthought is that email signatures are another of that widely > accepted netiquette set of standards. You can add the “Re: ” to that list. It is the sequence of four octets 0x52, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x20, and nothing else. The MUAs who write “RE: ” are wrong.

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread gene heskett
On 5/15/24 10:06, Nicolas George wrote: Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense to me. Git

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:46:08AM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the > magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to > both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense > to me. > > PS

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
-Original Message- From: Greg Wooledge To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Top Posting Date: 05/14/24 13:41:17 On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:01:31PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: > how many times has this top post crap been dug up > don't y'all have any thing better to

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Nicolas George
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): > Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the > magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to > both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense > to me. Git is an order of magnitude younger than

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
-Original Message- From: gene heskett To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Top Posting Date: 05/14/24 10:54:50 On 5/14/24 10:09, Richard wrote: Just because something isn't an official ISO standard doesn't mean it's not standard behavior. And how it relates to this mailing

Re: Erreurs tracker-extract: Could not connect to filesystem miner endpoint: Le délai d’attente est dépassé

2024-05-15 Thread Charles Plessy
> Le 15/05/2024 à 11:03, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > > > j'ai des tonnes de ceci dans mes logs système: > > > > mai 15 17:51:18 bubu tracker-extract[1711]: Could not connect to > > filesystem miner endpoint: Le délai d’attente est dépassé > > Le Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:12:12AM +0200,

Re: Dovecot correct ownership for logs

2024-05-15 Thread Henning Follmann
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:23:35PM +0200, Richard wrote: > [...] > But that's still not that helpful for the main issue. Why on earth is > postfix throwing issues about the log files, even when they are > world-readable and -writable? It's not that dovecot doesn't log to them, > but it's also

Re: Security hole in kernel fixed?

2024-05-15 Thread The Wanderer
On 2024-05-15 at 03:05, Hans wrote: > Dear developers, As usual, most of us here are not Debian developers, even if some of us may be software developers. > in April 2024 the security hole CVE-2023-6546 was discovered in linux-image, > and I believe, it > is fixed in kernel 6.1.0 (from

Re: Dovecot correct ownership for logs

2024-05-15 Thread jeremy ardley
On 15/5/24 18:52, Richard wrote: mailbox_transport isn't defined anywhere. Am Mi., 15. Mai 2024 um 12:37 Uhr schrieb jeremy ardley : On 15/5/24 18:23, Richard wrote: > Interesting. That's not even configured in our main.cfg. We have these > concerning dovecot: >

Re: Dovecot correct ownership for logs

2024-05-15 Thread Richard
mailbox_transport isn't defined anywhere. Am Mi., 15. Mai 2024 um 12:37 Uhr schrieb jeremy ardley < jeremy.ard...@gmail.com>: > > On 15/5/24 18:23, Richard wrote: > > Interesting. That's not even configured in our main.cfg. We have these > > concerning dovecot: > > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot > >

Re: Dovecot correct ownership for logs

2024-05-15 Thread jeremy ardley
On 15/5/24 18:23, Richard wrote: Interesting. That's not even configured in our main.cfg. We have these concerning dovecot: smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d $USER The sasl line is not relevant The mailbox_command is unusual. It means whatever process

Re: Dovecot correct ownership for logs

2024-05-15 Thread Richard
Interesting. That's not even configured in our main.cfg. We have these concerning dovecot: smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d $USER But that's still not that helpful for the main issue. Why on earth is postfix throwing issues about the log files, even when

Problème après mise à jour: la machine ne sort plus de veille.

2024-05-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Bonjour à tous, désolé pour la rafale de messages mais c'est un peu la cata… Aujourd'hui j'ai redémarré mon portable et depuis il ne sort plus de veille après qu'il y soit entré. Plus précisément, ni le clavier ni la souris ne se réveillent, et je n'ai pas d'autre choix que de redémarrer

Re: Erreurs tracker-extract: Could not connect to filesystem miner endpoint: Le délai d’attente est dépassé

2024-05-15 Thread NoSpam
Bonjour il s'agit d'un programme d'indexation de fichiers sous gnome. Sous Ubuntu il s'agit du paquet tracker-miner-fs Le 15/05/2024 à 11:03, Charles Plessy a écrit : Bonjour à tous, j'ai des tonnes de ceci dans mes logs système: mai 15 17:51:18 bubu tracker-extract[1711]: Could not

Erreurs tracker-extract: Could not connect to filesystem miner endpoint: Le délai d’attente est dépassé

2024-05-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Bonjour à tous, j'ai des tonnes de ceci dans mes logs système: mai 15 17:51:18 bubu tracker-extract[1711]: Could not connect to filesystem miner endpoint: Le délai d’attente est dépassé Il y a aussy d'autres messages du type: mai 15 17:58:49 bubu tracker-miner-f[4486]: Error opening

Erreurs gsd-media-keys Unable to get default source

2024-05-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Bonjour à tous, j'ai des tonnes de ceci dans mes logs système: mai 15 17:51:26 bubu gsd-media-keys[2154]: Unable to get default source Copilot m'a dit que c'est la faute à pulseaudio, mais mon système utilise pipewire… Le forum ArchLinux me dit qu'il faut réduire la version de pipewire de

Security hole in kernel fixed?

2024-05-15 Thread Hans
Dear developers, in April 2024 the security hole CVE-2023-6546 was discovered in linux-image, and I believe, it is fixed in kernel 6.1.0 (from debian/stable) as soon after this a new kernel was released. However, there is no new kernel 6.5.0-*-bpo released at that time, so my question:

Re: sanity check for /etc/ssl/certs?

2024-05-15 Thread Harald Dunkel
Problem was, /etc/ca-certificates.conf was not regenerated, even with apt install --reinstall -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confask,confnew,confmiss" ca-certificates Regards Harri