On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:52:04PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
IMO, the correct decision would be for the Debian Jr. meta package to
conflict with anything that may be offensive. We have things like the
anarchy docs
How are those offensive? I'm much, much more offended by bloated
software like
(oh no, a crosspost)
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 01:35:48AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
The man program (sometimes) runs as user man, so it can write cat
pages to /var/cache/man
HELP: My system has no files owned by user man, and I don't see
the point of the user,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:57:07AM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
1) nano-tiny is relatively easy to use.
2) nano-tiny has fewer bugs.
Using a non-vi-compatable editor on boot disks is a hanging offense
that debian will pay for once sysadmins try to install Debian but
realize they have better
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:06:12PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hi,
There's a bug filed against the doc-debian package, including the Debian
FAQ, about not having good backup instructions for users (admins). See
http://bugs.debian.org/69197 for details.
Can someone please suggest an answer
4 matches
Mail list logo
