On 1/5/24 05:41, David wrote:
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 00:43 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
David composed on 2024-01-04 04:30 (UTC):
With the latest Debian I'm trying to find the file to edit to
change
the IP address of a remote box, can anybody point me in the correct
direction please?
I can SSH
On 1/5/24 04:54, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Marco Moock wrote:
Am 04.01.2024 um 18:19:57 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
addresses both server and client.
Does IPv6 work basically on your machine, including name resolution?
Does
On 1/5/24 03:35, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 04.01.2024 um 18:19:57 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
addresses both server and client.
Does IPv6 work basically on your machine, including name resolution?
Yes I have bind running and ssh
Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
addresses both server and client.
I haven't found any good information on how to do that and what I did
find was extremely sparce.
I have NFS mounts working using ipv4 and want to change that to ipv6
--
Hindi madali ang
On 1/4/24 02:45, Richard Rosner wrote:
Wow, what a bunch of unhelpful comments.
First, if it wasn't for Eddie recommending boot-repair, "broken beyond
repair" in fact was the very fitting term.
Second, have you maybe considered that I've already read the home page
of rEFInd and came to the
On 1/3/24 17:57, Bret Busby wrote:
On 4/1/24 05:40, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support
WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it
On 12/26/23 20:04, Thomas George wrote:
Pulseaudio Volume control shows a strong signal audio output but
nothing reaches the speakers.
This must be a well known problem but I can't find the answer.
Please help
Tom George
I had the same issue with bookworm also. I am using LXQT and pav was
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 23, 2023, at 4:53 PM, Tim Woodall wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023, David Christensen wrote:
>> Sending a RST to a falsified IP address would make the sending host into an
>> attacker by proxy. Why do you suggest it?
>>
> Because the OP wants it to stop. And
On 12/23/23 12:00, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 12/23/2023 10:20 AM, Pocket wrote:
On 12/23/23 09:13, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Please see belowl
On 12/23/2023 08:44 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 08:34:16AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I
On 12/23/23 09:13, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Please see belowl
On 12/23/2023 08:44 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 08:34:16AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I installed VMware-Player-Full-17.5.0-22583795.x86_64.bundle without any
problems.
Wen I
On 12/23/23 01:00, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 22 Dec 2023 at 18:52:09 (-0500), Pocket wrote:
On 12/22/23 18:04, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 22 Dec 2023 at 16:16:07 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 08:59:42PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
1. https://bugs.debian.org/803144
2
On 12/22/23 18:04, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 22 Dec 2023 at 16:16:07 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 08:59:42PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
1. https://bugs.debian.org/803144
2. https://bugs.debian.org/346342
Wow, OK. Fascinating historical context in there.
I've
On 12/22/23 18:04, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 22 Dec 2023 at 16:16:07 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 08:59:42PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
1. https://bugs.debian.org/803144
2. https://bugs.debian.org/346342
Wow, OK. Fascinating historical context in there.
I've
On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote:
This is a test of the emergency broadcast system
Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list.
I am not spamming this list I am trying to determine if my email setup
is working.
This is a test of the emergency broadcast system
On 12/21/23 13:04, Alain D D Williams wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:39:40AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/21/23 10:50, Alain D D Williams wrote:
It is NOT a firewall issue.
If I am correct you don't want any thing from the outside to hit your web
server?
The words "web s
On 12/21/23 10:50, Alain D D Williams wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:31:06AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
All you should be seeing is scans which you can not prevent.
I am looking at incoming packets with tcpdump. This sees packets *before* they
are filtered by iptables.
What are you using
On 12/21/23 10:24, Alain D D Williams wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:11:08AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Use a firewall and set it up correctly.
That I have done.
The issue is broadband usage - ie before it hits the firewall.
All you should be seeing is scans which you can not prevent.
What
On 12/21/23 09:46, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:25:26 -0500
Pocket wrote:
Hello Pocket,
Forwarded Message
Putting a private message on the list, without sender's consent, is very
rude indeed. Given that it was announced by sender beforehand that they
would
On 12/21/23 09:58, Alain D D Williams wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 01:39:53PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
Okay well 30KiB/s is only about 78GiB/month which isn't really a
lot. I think we're both in UK and it's been hard to find a domestic
Internet connection that you'd run a web server on that
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Could we please cease this thread now? [WAS Re: lists]
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:15:23 +
From: Andy Smith
Reply-To: a...@strugglers.net
To: Pocket
Hello,
[off-list]
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:58:28AM -0500, Pocket
On 12/21/23 09:10, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote:
Hi Pocket,
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Pocket wrote:
What is your official capacity for debian?
This is the mailinglist debian-user, where User help User with their
problems. Mainly Desktop-related some server-related. but this is a
user
On 12/21/23 08:49, Andy Smith wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:35:44AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/21/23 06:32, Andy Smith wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 05:44:23AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Maybe I should not post at all?
Unless you are able to do better at it, that is a solution that I
On 12/21/23 06:32, Andy Smith wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 05:44:23AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Maybe I should not post at all?
Unless you are able to do better at it, that is a solution that I
for one am in favour of.
Andy
So I see that I am not welcome here.
Ok fine, I will take my leave
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 21, 2023, at 5:37 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 06:57:50PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
>>
>
> Could we please stop the thread now? You appear to be talking past each
> other at this point. Various suggestions as to t
On 12/20/23 20:45, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:04 PM Pocket wrote:
On 12/20/23 19:48, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2023-12-20 at 19:39, Felix Miata wrote:
Pocket composed on 2023-12-20 17:55 (UTC-0500):
Actually I can not change as the ISP has exclusive rights to the high
On 12/20/23 20:28, Felix Miata wrote:
Pocket composed on 2023-12-20 19:55 (UTC-0500):
Felix Miata wrote:
Pocket composed on 2023-12-20 17:55 (UTC-0500):
Actually I can not change as the ISP has exclusive rights to the high
speed internet in the area I reside in.
That's how it was where I
On 12/20/23 19:48, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2023-12-20 at 19:39, Felix Miata wrote:
Pocket composed on 2023-12-20 17:55 (UTC-0500):
Actually I can not change as the ISP has exclusive rights to the high
speed internet in the area I reside in.
No other providers are allowed.
That could
On 12/20/23 19:39, Felix Miata wrote:
Pocket composed on 2023-12-20 17:55 (UTC-0500):
Actually I can not change as the ISP has exclusive rights to the high
speed internet in the area I reside in.
No other providers are allowed.
That could be a historical concept, depending exactly on where
On 12/20/23 18:41, John Hasler wrote:
pocket writes:
I never implied that, only that the ISP services are spectrum only in the
area I live.
No Starlik? In any case what ISP you use is unrelated to what email
provider you use. I use pobox.com, but there are others.
No starlink
I have
On 12/20/23 17:59, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/20/23 14:14, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 20.12.2023 um 14:04:41 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
I have emails from other lists and personal email from other with the
same time frame
So in this case it was not because the email box/account was not
available
On 12/20/23 17:37, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/20/23 12:05, Pocket wrote:
On 12/20/23 11:51, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/20/23 08:30, Pocket wrote:
On 12/20/23 07:59, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 07:38:49AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
which poc...@columbus.rr.com
Not sure what
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 20, 2023, at 3:29 PM, Marco Moock wrote:
>
> Am 20.12.2023 um 15:08:32 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Nobody is interested in that, maybe the auto-unsubscribe is a good
> thing for all other list members.
>
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 20, 2023, at 2:14 PM, Marco Moock wrote:
>
> Am 20.12.2023 um 14:04:41 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
>
>> I have emails from other lists and personal email from other with the
>> same time frame
>>
>> So in this case it w
On 12/20/23 13:40, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote:
Hi everybody,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023, Pocket wrote:
What if there were more, that you did *not* see? Because they didn't
get through. If mail isn't reaching you, then the mail *telling* you
that mail isn't reaching you may also not reach you
On 12/20/23 13:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 12:05:26PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
I was kicked at 2%
How do you *know*?
What you *know* is that you *saw* *one* email message stating that
emails have been trouble reaching you, and that if this continues,
you will be unsubscribed
On 12/20/23 11:48, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:40:38AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
[...]
Still doesn't provide and answer for why I was kicked after one email
bounced.
You have seen just one bounce. Do you know your provider has shown you
all of them? Perhaps they bounced
On 12/20/23 11:51, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/20/23 08:30, Pocket wrote:
On 12/20/23 07:59, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 07:38:49AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
which poc...@columbus.rr.com
Not sure what you're trying to achieve but these administrative
commands should go
On 12/20/23 11:51, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:44:42AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Does one email constitute "persistently undeliverable"?
I hope that the Debian listmasters get back to you with more
details, but I interpret Spectrum's reject message to mean that
On 12/20/23 11:42, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:30:24AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/20/23 11:26,to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
And yes, yell to your provider. Everyone and her dog coming
up with random policies is what's killing email.
I am sure the will be quaking
On 12/20/23 11:37, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:16:02AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/20/23 11:12, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 20.12.2023 um 11:07:16 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
Spectrum limits the number of concurrent connections from a sender,
as well as the total number
On 12/20/23 11:31, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:07:16AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Spectrum limits the number of concurrent connections from a sender, as well
as the total number of connections allowed. Limits vary based on the
reputation of the IP address. Reduce your
On 12/20/23 11:26, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:16:02AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
[...]
Why is the user list the only one that has this issue?
It is the busiest list, thus the bounce probability might
be the highest.
And yes, yell to your provider. Everyone and her dog
On 12/20/23 11:12, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 20.12.2023 um 11:07:16 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
Spectrum limits the number of concurrent connections from a sender,
as well as the total number of connections allowed. Limits vary based
on the reputation of the IP address. Reduce your number of
connections
ger has any
noticeable benefit.
Greylisting would not cause the symptoms that you and Pocket are
experiencing; any sensible mailing list server including Debian's
will cope with temporary failure.
If we're not talking about greylisting, using a 5xx SMTP hard reject
code on new interactions would not
On 12/20/23 10:35, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:28 AM Pocket wrote:
[...]
I get/have a kick rate of 2% (one bounce in the last 60 days), then I am
kicked and no longer receive anything from the user list.
After many attempts over several days...
I finally get email
On 12/20/23 10:11, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote:
Am Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:13:12AM -0500 schrieb Pocket:
On 12/20/23 07:59, Andy Smith wrote:
[...]
Every 60 days I get kicked from this list which I receive an email stating
my kick value is 2%.
I receive this mails, too. The first impression
On 12/20/23 07:59, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 07:38:49AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
which poc...@columbus.rr.com
Not sure what you're trying to achieve but these administrative
commands should go to the mailing list software at
, not to debian-user@, which is the list
itself
which poc...@columbus.rr.com
--
Hindi madali ang maging ako
which poc...@columbus.rr.com
--
Hindi madali ang maging ako
which poc...@columbus.rr.com
--
Hindi madali ang maging ako
On 12/16/23 08:45, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am running Bookworm on my Debian computer. When I installed the OS I
selected the option for separate /var etc, and selected the default
sizes of the partitions.
When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
E: You don't
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 14, 2023, at 2:23 PM, Linux-Fan wrote:
>
> Pocket writes:
>
>>> On 12/14/23 08:11, Henning Follmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:47:41PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:55 PM Pocket
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 14, 2023, at 1:51 PM, David Christensen
> wrote:
>
> On 12/14/23 08:04, Pocket wrote:
>>> On Dec 14, 2023, at 4:09 AM, David Christensen
>>> wrote:
>>> Another benefit of ZFS snapshots is that they are are atomic. (
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 14, 2023, at 4:09 AM, David Christensen
> wrote:
>
> On 12/13/23 08:51, Pocket wrote:
>> I gave up using raid many years ago and I used the extra drives as backups.
>> Wrote a script to rsync /home to the backup drives.
>
>
>
On 12/14/23 08:11, Henning Follmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:47:41PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:55 PM Pocket wrote:
What formats does certs need to be to work with update-ca-certificates?
PEM or DER?
PEM
Well lets look at man update-ca-certificates
On 12/13/23 21:50, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:34:37 +0800
jeremy ardley wrote:
You don't have to be your own CA. It's very easy to use letsencrypt
to generate valid certificates for hosts even if they are not
directly connected to the internet.
Oooh, is there a writeup
On 12/13/23 21:47, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:55 PM Pocket wrote:
What formats does certs need to be to work with update-ca-certificates?
PEM or DER?
PEM
Ok since I am using an intermediate cert to sign, I am creating a
combined PEM with the root CA
On 12/13/23 20:25, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 07:54:45PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
What formats does certs need to be to work with update-ca-certificates?
PEM or DER?
I have just finished writing some scripts to generate certs for my email
server and nginx server
On 12/13/23 20:34, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 14/12/23 08:54, Pocket wrote:
I have just finished writing some scripts to generate certs for my
email server and nginx server.
The scripts allow me to become my own CA.
You don't have to be your own CA. It's very easy to use letsencrypt
What formats does certs need to be to work with update-ca-certificates?
PEM or DER?
I have just finished writing some scripts to generate certs for my email
server and nginx server.
The scripts allow me to become my own CA.
The man page states that the cert needs to have a suffix of .crt.
On 12/13/23 13:50, Dan Ritter wrote:
Pocket wrote:
Many reasons
If the RAID controller bites the bullet you are usually toast unless you
have another RAID controller (same manufacturer and type) as a spare.
mdadm, zfs and btrfs all lack this problem.
Not for me as I am not going
On 12/13/23 13:47, Nicolas George wrote:
Pocket (12023-12-13):
If the RAID controller
Then use software RAID with a Libre implementation.
Nope been there done that and I ain't doing that
I found it is better to just have my data on several backup disks
Yeah, backups and RAID
On 12/13/23 13:20, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/13/23 11:51, Pocket wrote:
On 12/13/23 10:26, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10
for my /home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for
access. Anything that wants
On 12/13/23 10:26, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10
for my /home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for access.
Anything that wants to open a file on it, is subjected to a freeze of
at least 30 seconds BEFORE
On 12/13/23 10:33, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:13:44PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:10:37AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:56:46AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
If so, then IIUC the answer is a resounding "YES, it is
On 12/11/23 09:52, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 10 Dec 2023 at 15:51:02 (-0500), Pocket wrote:
On Dec 10, 2023, at 3:05 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 08 Dec 2023 at 16:29:12 (-0500), Paul M Foster wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 11:04:54AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 08 Dec 2023 at 11
On 12/11/23 09:34, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-12-11 15:16:57 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:58:01PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I do not care about the "microsoft world", and I doubt that this is
required there at the low level (what would be the equivalent
On 12/11/23 09:04, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-12-11 08:16:30 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
2) When *receiving* email, mutt will use the sender's MIME type label
to decide how to deal with the attachment.
But the notion of filename extension is even used in this context too.
Quoting the
On 12/11/23 07:12, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-12-10 15:51:02 -0500, Pocket wrote:
On Dec 10, 2023, at 3:05 PM, David Wright wrote:
¹ Re the argument raging in this thread about "extension", the
term is clearly appropriate, as a glance at /etc/mime.types
demonstrates. The
On 12/11/23 06:39, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-12-08 17:06:15 -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/8/23 16:53, David wrote:
Hi, the filename extension is usually irrelevant on Linux, because
Linux tools typically
use the standard 'file' command to inspect the content of the
fileinstead of relying
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 10, 2023, at 3:05 PM, David Wright wrote:
>
> On Fri 08 Dec 2023 at 16:29:12 (-0500), Paul M Foster wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 11:04:54AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
>>> On Fri 08 Dec 2023 at 11:56:12 (-0500), Paul M Foster wrote:
I'm on Debian
On 12/9/23 01:29, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:56 AM Pocket wrote:
On 12/8/23 00:05, John Hasler wrote:
> Gene writes:
>> AND (horrors) have written it down.
> That's the right thing to do.
Well you could always use the univer
On 12/8/23 17:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 04:50:04PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Greg writes:
cc(1) and make(1) would like to have a talk with you.
Those are applications and can do whatever they want. The OS does not
care about extensions.
What do you consider "the OS"
On 12/8/23 18:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:59:58PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/8/23 17:54, Greg Wooledge wrote:
cc(1) looks at the file extension to decide what kind of content each
named argument file is expected to contain.
No it looks for a suffix
So Debian files
On 12/8/23 17:54, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:41:57PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/8/23 17:31, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:06:15PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
In Unix and Linux there isn't a file extension, that is a microsoft
invention.
cc(1) and make(1
On 12/8/23 17:41, Pocket wrote:
On 12/8/23 17:31, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:06:15PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
In Unix and Linux there isn't a file extension, that is a microsoft
invention.
cc(1) and make(1) would like to have a talk with you.
Linux/Unix filenaming specs
On 12/8/23 17:31, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:06:15PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
In Unix and Linux there isn't a file extension, that is a microsoft
invention.
cc(1) and make(1) would like to have a talk with you.
Linux/Unix filenaming specs would like to inform you.
file
On 12/8/23 16:53, David wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 21:45, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 11:04:54AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 08 Dec 2023 at 11:56:12 (-0500), Paul M Foster wrote:
I'm on Debian bookworm, using neomutt for email. Where there is an image to
view,
On 12/8/23 13:13, John Hasler wrote:
Too
bad: it does everything I want except make phone calls.
Phones now a days are not expected nor intended to make phone calls
--
It's not easy to be me
On 12/8/23 00:05, John Hasler wrote:
Gene writes:
AND (horrors) have written it down.
That's the right thing to do.
Well you could always use the universal password of password
I use for example i use the following
for the root account the password is root
for my user account of pocket
On 12/7/23 09:22, John Hasler wrote:
Greg writes:
You'd think that you can determine the length of the test by
subtracting the start time from the end time, right?
That would have worked had the times been stored as UTC (better yet, TAI
or Unix time since UTC can cause a similar problem).
On 12/7/23 07:16, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:46:50PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 06 Dec 2023 at 18:16:42 (-0500), Pocket wrote:
Which BTW this whole discussion about timezones is just water over the dam.
The system should be set to UTC, the "timezone&q
On 12/6/23 19:46, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 07:37:32PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/6/23 19:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 07:23:18PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/6/23 19:12, Greg Wooledge wrote:
So, basically every reference I can find, and every reference
On 12/6/23 19:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 07:23:18PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/6/23 19:12, Greg Wooledge wrote:
So, basically every reference I can find, and every reference I've *ever*
found, other than Pocket's email, has said that America/New_York is
correct for me
On 12/6/23 19:12, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:11:16PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Because DST was not in force/usage except the metro NYC. Every where else
didn't use/have it.
That makes EST5DST correct except for NYC and America/New_York completely
incorrect except of course
On 12/6/23 18:28, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 02:50:50PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Well since I am not going to set any of my systems to a time in 1920, then I
believe I am save from the time machines.
It's not just about your system's current time. It's about timestamps
On 12/6/23 15:28, David Wright wrote:
Likely none for times present and future, unless Eric Adams should
pass a timezone bill. (In the 2010s, several U.S. states considered
legislation to move from the Eastern Time Zone to Atlantic Standard
Time, allegedly.)
But I've already posted an example
On 12/6/23 15:41, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 06 Dec 2023 at 13:27:40 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:02:45PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
TZ=POSIX;date
Wed Dec 6 18:00:38 POSIX 2023
"POSIX" is not a valid timezone name in Debian 12. Therefore you're
just seein
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 1:28 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:02:45PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
>> TZ=POSIX;date
>> Wed Dec 6 18:00:38 POSIX 2023
>
> "POSIX" is not a valid timezone name in Debian 12. Therefore y
On 12/6/23 12:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:40:00PM -, Curt wrote:
POSIX format specification
The POSIX time zone format is the traditionally used format for AIX systems
and
provides a slight performance advantage over the Olson time zone format.
Example of
On 12/6/23 12:24, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:06:04PM -0500, Pocket wrote:
From the README
The information in the time zone data files is by no means authoritative;
fixes and enhancements are welcome. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING
for details
I take that as chaos
On 12/6/23 11:42, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 06/12/2023 12:22, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 05 Dec 2023 at 23:37:31 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
I am surprised that POSIX EST5EDT timezone has irregularities at least
as it is implemented in GNU libc. I believed that it specifies just
standard and
On 12/6/23 11:18, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:44:42AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
Well POSIX has worked for me since the days of Xenix and System V.
Well, most of the goofy time zone changes were all *before* that. But
there's at least one that happened more recently
On 12/6/23 10:07, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 06/12/2023 20:08, Pocket wrote:
On 12/6/23 07:22, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 06/12/2023 00:03, Pocket wrote:
On 12/5/23 11:37, Max Nikulin wrote:
dpkg-reconfigure tzdata
That does not work. Cannot set EST5EDT. you have to do that manually.
Do
On 12/6/23 07:22, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 06/12/2023 00:03, Pocket wrote:
On 12/5/23 11:37, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 05/12/2023 05:14, Pocket wrote:
For gene
[...]
dpkg-reconfigure tzdata
That does not work. Cannot set EST5EDT
On 12/5/23 12:21, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/5/23 11:38, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 05/12/2023 05:14, Pocket wrote:
For
gene..
[...]
zone=EST5EDT
zoneinfo=/usr/share/zoneinfo
localtime=/etc/localtime
timezone=/etc/timezone
profile
On 12/5/23 11:37, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 05/12/2023 05:14, Pocket wrote:
For
gene..
[...]
zone=EST5EDT
zoneinfo=/usr/share/zoneinfo
localtime=/etc/localtime
timezone=/etc/timezone
profile=/etc/profile.d
if [ -e "$zon
On 12/4/23 15:28, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/4/23 07:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
ls -hal /etc/localtime
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Nov 1 18:21 /etc/localtime ->
/usr/share/zoneinfo/EST5EDT
And using mc to edit that link fixed it, I am now getting the correct
time from date, thank you a lot.
On 12/4/23 07:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:55:25AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
On 12/4/23 03:58, gene heskett wrote:
I have this printer getting its time info from this machine's ntpsec but
the chrony in the printer is ignoring /etc/timezone, stuck in PST or 4
hours behind me
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
