Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...

Martin Read wrote: > On 13/03/17 19:30, Patrick Bartek wrote: >> The Linux mantra has always been "choice," plethoras of choices. So >> why at install time, is there no choice for the init system? > Looking at the BTS page for package 'debian-installer', nobody seems > to

Re: isolinux.bin missing or corrupt

David Christensen wrote: > When I put the ISO on a USB flash drive and boot it: > isolinux.bin missing or corrupt How did you put the ISO on the flash drive? Did you use dd or cat or cp or some program like unetbootin? Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core

Re: Missing ifuse package in Jessie

Mario Frasca wrote: > according to the package tracker (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ifuse): > O: This package has been orphaned and needs a maintainer. ifuse was in Wheezy, but was removed for the release of Jessie. It may be included in Stretch. Grüße, Sven. --

Re: upgraded config files in /lib/systemd/system

Michael Biebl wrote: > Useful in that regard is also systemd-delta, which will show you local > overrides or extensions. Which still does not work for instanced units. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797839 and https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/45

Re: confusion in /etc/network/interfaces

Dominik George wrote: >> I need to know that what is the difference b/w eth1.0101 and eth:1. >> actually i need to know what is the main difference in "." and ":". >> any suggestion will be highly appreciated. > : denotes an alias (second address on same interface), .

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

Brad Rogers wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:28:22 -0500 Chuck Hallenbeck > wrote: >> Any idea where to go from here? > File you need is in package sid's libc6 package. NB: A quick search > seems to indicate that it's currently *only* available

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > Okay, I think we're closing in on it. > The Cepstral swift package runs fine on archlinux, where using ldd -r > on the executable lists eleven libraries, all but one of which is > present on Debian where the Cepstral package fails. On

Re: upgraded config files in /lib/systemd/system

Marc Auslander wrote: > Dominique Dumont writes: >> On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 14:01:18 CET Harald Dunkel wrote: >>> short question about /lib/systemd/system: AFAICS the config >>> files here are supposed to be overridden by local config files >>> in

Re: Secure Boot won't let boot into Debian

Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I frehly installed Debian Sid in dual boot with Windows 10 on my brand > new Lenovo desktop pc but it won't boot into Debian system I suspect > because of the new Secure Boot policy. I want to disable it but the > problem is that there's no

Re: Error when compiling drivers for Asus PEB-10G/57811-1S

Leslie Rhorer wrote: > I purchased a couple of Asus PEB-10G/57811-1S 10G LAN adapters. I am > not finding any pre-built binaries nor a .deb reporitory for these > cards, so I am attempting t o compile from scratch, Why? The bnx2 module is available in the default kernel

Re: Migrate Virtualbox

Kent West wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: >> ...Virtualbox is going away and will not be in stretch when it >> becomes the stable distro shortly. > Is this true? I've just spent 15 minutes googling for the answer, but > either

Re: Kernel Update on Stretch

Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:46:08PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Daniel Bareiro <daniel-lis...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> Some time ago I read that Linux 4.x incorporates the feature to be >>> updated without requ

Re: Kernel Update on Stretch

Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Some time ago I read that Linux 4.x incorporates the feature to be > updated without requiring a restart of the operating system. Some Linux Distributions have such a feature. Debian is not one of them. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core

Re: Chromium: all apps gone, reinstalling fails

Markus Grunwald wrote: > Just now I noticed, that all the apps/extensions from my chromium are > gone :( Quoting from News.Debian of chromium: chromium-browser (55.0.2883.75-4) unstable; urgency=medium * External extensions are now disabled by default. Chromium will

Re: Before I install Debian

Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday 12 February 2017 02:49:41 John Culleton wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:13:20 -0700 Bob Holtzman <hol...@cox.net> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:54:34PM -0500, Doug wrote: >>>> On 02/10/20

Re: Before I install Debian

John Culleton wrote: > All I need from Debian is Adobe Acrobat Reader. Is this available with > Debian? No. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Best way to set maximum number of open descriptors for a process

Daniel Bareiro wrote: > On 08/02/17 10:20, Greg Wooledge wrote: >>> The process starts as a service, so it does not require a shell: >>> I had thought that I could add something to the script that starts the >>> process, but I'm not sure if it's the best idea from the

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Mike Nunn wrote: > It's Hetzners standard build on their hardware so will follow up with > them, as you say something seriously wrong. Knowing Hetzner, I doubt they will be helpful. S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Alix 3D3

David wrote: > I have Debian running on an Alix Board 3D3, but I've got problems. > SSHing into the Alix board it tells me that Framebuffer console may not > be available or /dev/fb0 is not set to 32 bit. Where do you get this message? Why do you think this is a

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Mike Nunn <bonnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 February 2017 at 14:47, Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: >> Please test if just calling "strace sync" as root hangs as well. > Yes it does > strace sync > . > open("/usr/lib

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Mike Nunn wrote: > [-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, charset: UTF-8, 24 lines --] > I have an strace output for the following: > strace -f -o foo update-initramfs -u -v > It stopped at the following line as usual: > Building cpio /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64.new initramfs

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Mike Nunn wrote: > can't install strace as apt suggests running dpkg --configure -a , prob due > to the failure of the upgrade > with update-initramfs -u -v -k 3.16.0-4-amd64 hung there doesn't seem to be > a cpio process running Strange. If it hangs at "Building cpio

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 04 Feb 2017, Mike Nunn wrote: >> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-block/ORDER ignored: not executable > Is /tmp mounted "noexec"? Just Don't Do It[tm]. The system will break > in hideously crazy, suprising ways. BTW, this

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Mike Nunn <bonnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: >> Hmm. How long did you wait for it to complete? Is "/boot" full? >> Or is the disk /boot is on just abysmally slow? > It's still stuck, been over an hour now. Everythin

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Mike Nunn wrote: > It seems to stop after the last line shown below. > Building cpio /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64.new initramfs Hmm. How long did you wait for it to complete? Is "/boot" full? Or is the disk /boot is on just abysmally slow? Grüße, Sven. --

Re: upgrade failed debian 8.7

Mike Nunn wrote: > uname -a 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64 > GNU/Linux > I ran sudo apt update followed by upgrade > it hangs at the following point: > Setting up linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 (3.16.39-1) ... >

Re: What file system to use?

Roba wrote: > Is there any difference between ext3 and ext4 in terms of backing up a > system? I can't recall the details but I run into a backup problem > once and remember reading that ext4 was under experimentation by the > backup developers and ext3 was supported fully

Re: Can I use more than one nic?

Dan Ritter wrote: > Case 2: a system gains redundancy and capacity. > Each NIC attaches to the same switch. The switch has to be > configurable to do Link Aggregation Protocol -- not all can. > You configure the system NICs to become a bond device, using >

Re: missing firmware ??

Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> wrote: > On 29/01/17 07:18, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Frank M <debianl...@videotron.ca> wrote: >>> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-1-amd64 >>> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/kbl_guc

Re: missing firmware ??

Frank M <debianl...@videotron.ca> wrote: > On 28/01/17 01:18 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Frank M <debianl...@videotron.ca> wrote: >>> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-1-amd64 >>> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/kbl_guc

Re: missing firmware ??

Frank M wrote: > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-1-amd64 > W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/kbl_guc_ver9_14.bin for > module i915 > W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/bxt_guc_ver8_7.bin for module > i915 Do you have a

Re: apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r) downloads incorrect version

David Wittman wrote: >> 3.16.0-4 is *not* the kernel version but the ABI name used. > I feel dumb for asking, but the output of uname is not the exact > kernel version I'm running? That seems contradictory to everything > I've learned and read... including what I just read

Re: apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r) downloads incorrect version

David Wittman wrote: > I am trying to download the kernel source so that I can patch a kernel > module, but I keep finding that it's pulling a more recent kernel release > than the one I specify. IE: > ``` > vagrant@debian-jessie:~$ uname -r > 3.16.0-4-amd64 >

Re: Strange console and syslog message

i.mer...@tagesschau.de wrote: > Since the latest system upgrade (apt-get upgrade), which actually didn't > change anything with the kernel, I get annoyed every ten seconds by the > following message on the console and in /var/log/syslog: > Jan 24 12:00:37 hhloktsde-ardenc-master3 kernel:

Re: kernel 3.16.39-1

Vadim Kolchev wrote: > Yes, this is normal, new 8.7 point release is out, site is slower to > update info then mailing list. If you wish to stay more up to date, I > recommend to subscribe to mailing lists, such as debian-releas and > debian-security. there have been

Re: kernel 3.16.39-1

Scott Lair wrote: > Just downloaded a bunch of updates. I end up with kernel 3.16.39-1 You just downloaded the Debian Jessie 8.7 point-release. > uname: > 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1 (2016-12-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux > However on debian.org 3.16.36-1 is still

Re: Defferences in kernel version and kernel release

Stefan Monnier wrote: >> This is what is called the Kernel-ABI. All modules compiled for >> "3.16.0-4-amd64" will be compatible with all kernels providing this. > I had kind of figured that out, but one thing still puzzles me: why > isn't it "3.16-4-amd64"? I mean,

Re: Defferences in kernel version and kernel release

solitone <solit...@mail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, January 14, 2017 1:12:52 PM CET Sven Hartge wrote: >> This is the real kernel version. > Hi Sven, and thanks for your explanation. This means that > 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 is based on the following official version? > https://

Re: Defferences in kernel version and kernel release

Вадим Колчев wrote: > Have up-to-date stable Jessie installation and noticed interesting thing. > My kernel release is different from kernel-version. Is this okay? Yes, it is. > If yes, > why is this so? > uname -r > 3.16.0-4-amd64 This is what is called the

Re: apt-get is not following preferences.d

Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: > What is going wrong here? Any idea? Possibly https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849382 Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: autofs config

Reco wrote: > [1] http://blog.tomecek.net/post/automount-with-systemd/ Note: this only works with static mounts. If you want to use any kind of automatic mapping you can't do this with systemd. Grüße, S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: hotpluggable member of a bridge

Michael Biebl wrote: >> [2] Once, for a customer: inserting the right storage medium (with >>the right UUID) triggered a system backup. > Please don't do that. udev is a not a service manager and starting (long > running) tasks from a udev rule is bad. I wish someone

Re: Potential problem with aptitude search?

Carl Fink wrote: > Thoughts? I'll submit a bug report if warranted but I thought I'd get the > community's opinion first. aptitude search the package name and only the package name by default. If you want to search inside the description, you have to search like this:

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > On 2016-12-15 10:41:58 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Next is a check if the sending IP resolves correctly and the hostname >> resolves back to this IP. > > I wonder whether this rule should rea

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:51:45AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> - does the sender know their mail was not delivered and do they get a >> reasonable explanation? I've heard there are spam filters who give a >> "user doesn't exist" error which is somewhat disrespectful

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Daniel Pocock wrote: > A key point to consider for any filtering is the user experience when a > legitimate message is not delivered. > This includes the following: > - does the sender know their mail was not delivered and do they get a > reasonable explanation? I've heard

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Glenn English wrote: > What Sven suggested is pretty good. But I'd do all the local checks > first, then hit the RBLs on the 'Net -- it reduces the load on the > RBLs and on the local 'Net, and a CPU is faster than a 'Net connection > (I'm on a T1, so I'm very aware of

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > On Thu 15 Dec 2016 at 10:41:58 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: > [..Snip...] >> This seems all very complicated (it is), but because of the environment >> I work in (University) it is very important for us (and our users) to >> have

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Daniel Pocock wrote: > Could anybody provide updates to those pages? What would professional > mail server admins consider best practice today? Problem is: the more (drastic) anti-SPAM measures everyone take, the more broken e-mail as a whole becomes. I noticed in the last

Re: LVM RAID vs LVM over MD

Roman Tsisyk <ro...@tsisyk.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: >> Dan Ritter <d...@randomstring.org> wrote: >>> If you want LVM on top of RAID, use LVM on top of mdadm, but >>> consider whether you m

Re: LVM RAID vs LVM over MD

Dan Ritter wrote: > If you want LVM on top of RAID, use LVM on top of mdadm, but consider > whether you might actually want ZFS instead. Side note: With ZFS you don't want to use MD (or any other RAID) below ZFS but instead put all disk directly into a (or multiple) VDEV.

Re: LVM RAID vs LVM over MD

Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > I'd like to make sure I'm taking away the right thing from this > conversation. > It seems we have high-level recommendations _not_ to use LVM RAID1. Yes. > Not just over MD, simply don't use it at all. Do I get that right? Yes. With MD lower

Re: nvidia-driver in Sid

Ramon Hofer wrote: > Is there anything I can do to rsolve the dependencies? You need to use the nvidia-drivers from Experimental for the time beeing. S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: LVM RAID vs LVM over MD

Kamil Jońca wrote: > So far I used lvm with raid1 device as PV. > Recently I have to extend my VG > (https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/11/msg00909.html) > and I read some about lvm. If I understand correctly, LVM have > builtin RAID1 functionality. And I wonder

Re: cyrus-imap-ssl crashing

Henning Follmann wrote: > Sending is not an imap issue. So you might want look into the MTA (in your > case Postfix). It can be if postfix uses cyrus as authentication source. S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

Brian wrote: > The only thing I vaguely understand about the difference between the > two is that httpredir.debian.org uses the traditional mirror network > whereas deb.debian.org uses the Fastly CDN (Content Delivery Network) > and there is some caching going on. Fastly

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

Brian wrote: > On Sat 26 Nov 2016 at 11:51:19 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: >> Thanks Sven. Is this still a beta service or mature enough to be >> recommended to debian users? Hopefully there is a formal announcement >> on this. As it stands, httpredir is mentioned in

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: >> httpredir is somewhat deprecated now. >> >> The new official service is deb.debian.org: >> >> deb http://deb.d

Re: Package configure problem during Installation.

kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > For these and many other reasons, it is better to use the "mirror > redirector service". The idea is to add something like > deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free > in the /etc/apt/sources.list and let

Re: Cannot apt-add repository

"Rasku, Stephen (GE Digital)" wrote: > When I try and add-apt-repository, I get the following: > $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:git-core/ppa Don't add Ubuntu-PPAs to a Debian system. It will not work and it may destroy your installation. S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core

Re: veeger is infected ...startx again

Erwan David wrote: > You'd better explain what you call "veeger" nobody will understand > your problem. I think he means "V'ger", which would be a reference to the first Star Trek Movie. S! -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: WARNING! New Perl/Perl-base upgrade removes 141 Sid/Unstable packages

Andre Majorel wrote: > On 2016-09-28 10:46 -0500, John Hasler wrote: >> Vincent Lefevre writes: >>> Things like that should not happen. But this is not a bug in the >>> perl packages. This is a misfeature of apt / aptitude, which want to >>> remove packages instead of

Re: WARNING! New Perl/Perl-base upgrade removes 141 Sid/Unstable packages

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-09-28 10:46:31 -0500, John Hasler wrote: >> Vincent Lefevre writes: >>> Things like that should not happen. But this is not a bug in the >>> perl packages. This is a misfeature of apt / aptitude, which want to >>> remove packages instead of

Re: system gobbles disk space

Tony van der Hoff wrote: > However, it wouldn't work in this case. Various other applications > rely on the names of the compressed files being in a particular > format, which I can't easily achieve with logrotate. So, I'll stick > with my original script but add "apachectl

Re: WARNING! New Perl/Perl-base upgrade removes 141 Sid/Unstable packages

Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > Good morning! Just a heads up that upgrading the following two > packages attempts to remove 141 unrelated packages in Sid/Unstable > this morning: > perl 5.24.1~rc3-2 > perl-base 5.24.1~rc3-2 > I grab AMD64 packages in case that makes a

Re: change password prompt

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > On 09/19/2016 10:21 AM, Reco wrote: >> Defaults passprompt_override,passprompt="ENTER NUCLEAR LAUNCH CODE:" >> >> Of course you should use visudo, not edit /etc/sudoers directly. > True. But I use mc, have done so for years and that seems to work.

Re: How to prevent /tmp files from being deleted at reboot

MI wrote: > In Debian Jessie, systemd ignores the TMPTIME variable in /etc/default/rcS > and just > blindly deletes everything on every reboot. > A bug has been filed about it: "#795269 TMPTIME not honored anymore" > (

Re: jessie won't install/boot on a Dell Poweredge R815

deloptes wrote: > Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote: >> I am attempting to install jessie on a Dell Poweredge R815. It has >> been running wheezy reliably for years. And running squeeze reliably >> for years before that. But no matter what I try it won't install or >> boot. > why

Re: Rebuilding system after aptitude

Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: > On Sunday 12 June 2016 17:21:10 Sven Hartge wrote: >> egrep is in /bin/egrep and in the package grep. grep itself is >> "Priority: required" so you can't not have this package. If you don't >> have /bin/egrep, the

Re: Rebuilding system after aptitude

Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 12 June 2016 16:23:47 Felix Miata wrote: >> # dpkg -l | sort | egrep >> 'alsa|arts|imedia-l|libasoun|mix|pavuc|phonon|pulse|space-libs' ii > egrep apparently not in my $PATH, can't find it even after a re-install. egrep is in /bin/egrep

Re: Some Flash news

Stuart Longland wrote: > On 17/05/16 04:20, Erwan David wrote: >> Problem is not the browser. Problem is sites/Appliances which require >> it (eg. VMWare vcenter) > VMWare are allegedly getting rid of their Flash dependence. Well, kind of. A new HTML5-based web

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn <mikemcg...@mcginnweb.net> wrote: > On 05/31/2016 02:31 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Mike McGinn <mikemcg...@mcginnweb.net> wrote: >>> My system is 64 bit. I tried downloading from google with: >>> wget >>> http://dl.google.com/linux/chrom

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn wrote: > My system is 64 bit. I tried downloading from google with: > wget > http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/google-chrome-stable_50.0.2661.102-1_amd64.deb Try

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

Mike McGinn wrote: > My hard drive in my laptop took a dump on Friday, so after installing > a new one I installed Wheezy since I am not ready to move to Jessie > yet. > The thing is, I am running the chromium-browser which is old and seems > to exit randomly. I would

Re: chromium browser flash?

John Conover wrote: > Wheezy 32 bit chromium browser flash stopped after apt-get update this > morning. > Any suggestions, (without a 64 bit laptop)? Switch to Firefox. 32bit Flash for Chromium is no longer available, since Google stopped supporting 32bit Linux in Chrome,

Re: chromium-browser for 32bit jessie?

John Conover wrote: > Here is what apt-get says about chromium-browser in jessie: > # apt-get install chromium-browser > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Package chromium-browser is not

Re: LACP inbound traffic aggregation problem

Evgeniy Sudyr wrote: > I'm wondered what's missing there, why inbound traffic is not coming > over both interfaces, but one. Then it is working correct. You misunderstood how most bonding-modes work. Only round-robin allows you to do what you want, but most switches

Re: how to fix / partition (cylinder problem start) on ssd

e Lpe wrote: > fdisk -l report a warning message of the begining of the partition doesn't > start on a physical cylinder on my ssd. > Ignore ? Fix ? Ignore, most likely. > It's my / partition perahps if i resize it it'll be goog. > Some advise ? Show the output of

Re: [a...@cityscape.co.uk: Re: mutt attachment error]

Haines Brown wrote: > Yes, I discovered that to be the case. So I am now able to configure the > attachment file as I want: > message_size_limit = 200M But you do know, that just because your MTA does allow mails bigger than 200MiB (which will be ~130MB before base64

Re: mutt attachment error

Haines Brown wrote: > I'm still having no luck increasing maximum attachment size. > I create file: /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros > I leave it default permissions: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root > It has a single line: MESSAGE_SIZE_LIMIT = 200M > followed by CR. > And I restart

Re: mutt attachment error

David Wright wrote: > On Fri 13 May 2016 at 07:10:02 (-0400), Haines Brown wrote: >> I'm still having no luck increasing maximum attachment size. >> >> I create file: /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros >> I leave it default permissions: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root >> It has a

Re: mutt attachment error

Haines Brown wrote: > I took a look at /usr/share/doc/exim4/README.Debian.gz and found that to > use a macro to change a default configuration value I need to define the > new value in a local configuration file. I have a non-split > configuration, and so it seems I must

Re: archivemail screwed up (some of) my backups

steve wrote: > I understand, but since I have more or less 2/3 of the *.gz that are ok, > I thought archivemail was the responsible. But after gunzipping some > other files, it seems that the problem only arises on ISO-8850 text file, > not on UTF-8. But not tech savvy enough

Re: mutt attachment error

Haines Brown wrote: > I tried to use mutt to send someone a zip file of about 50 Mb and got > the error: "Error sending message, child exited 1 (). Could not send > message." > I assumed the attachment was too large and so went to > /etc/exim4/conf.d/main/02*/ and altered

Re: mutt attachment error

Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue 10 May 2016 at 17:43:03 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: >> David Wright <deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: >> > On Tue 10 May 2016 at 11:07:47 (-0400), Haines Brown wrote: >>>> I tried to use mutt to send

Re: mutt attachment error

David Wright wrote: > On Tue 10 May 2016 at 11:07:47 (-0400), Haines Brown wrote: >> I tried to use mutt to send someone a zip file of about 50 Mb and got >> the error: "Error sending message, child exited 1 (). Could not send >> message." >> >> I assumed the

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday 09 May 2016 02:01:28 Sven Hartge wrote: >> Beware: this is David who has this CPU, not Lisi, wo has not yet >> provided any further info in her CPU. > I have not yet gained access to the computer again, which

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2016, David Wright wrote: >> Signature: Type 0, Family 6, Model 15, Stepping 2 > I don't think anyone shipped a Core2 with that bad a BIOS, let alone Dell, > but I could be wrong about it. Beware: this is David who

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2016, Sven Hartge wrote: >> A long enough passphrase combined with WPA2 is virtually unhackable, >> as long as you switch of WPS. > Only as long as your smartphone or any other device using that n

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday 08 May 2016 12:59:27 Sven Hartge wrote: >> Unless the computer is more than 10 years old, it should be able to >> run 64bit. > It must be because it won't! It's certainly pretty old. I'll try > again - I have to ad

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday 07 May 2016 23:25:35 Sven Hartge wrote: >> Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Granted - but my client won't be in a hurry to buy a new computer. >> > And Google says: "We in

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

Lisi Reisz wrote: > Granted - but my client won't be in a hurry to buy a new computer. > And Google says: "We intend to continue supporting the 32-bit build > configurations on Linux to support building Chromium." Chromium still > being available on Wheezy, the Debian

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-07, Lisi Reisz wrote: >> Has anyone got the 32 bit file of libpepflashplayer.so? If so, are you >> willing to send it to me? Please, if you do, could you tell me which >> version >> it is. Thank you. > Quickly looking at this

Re: [Jessie] Is there a way to delay bonding interface initalization to happen after network driver is up

Mariusz Gronczewski wrote: > I have 2 machines(IBM servers). Both use bnx2 NIC driver but one is VERY > slow to boot thru kernel (2.3s vs 27s) > Config is: > auto bond508 > allow-hotplug bond508 > iface bond508 inet static > address 1.2.3.4/24 > slaves eth0.508

Re: preseed install on bond link with LACP (802.3ad)

ML mail wrote: > I would like to preseed a Debian jessie installation over a bond0 > interface with LACP but my problem is that the installer by itself > does not support bonding out of the box. My idea and workaround would > be to use the early_command preseed parameter to

Re: Repository Problem

Michael Milliman <michael.e.milli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/15/2016 03:18 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Dan Ritter <d...@randomstring.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:06:18PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >>>> I just had a catastrophic crash w

Re: Repository Problem

Dan Ritter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:06:18PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >> I just had a catastrophic crash which necessitated reinstalling >> Debian. I had been running v-7.2,but decided to upgrade to v-7.10 >> with a complete install. >> >> Now when I

Re: Incorrect arp reply when bonding and 3rd interface are on same LAN.

Mimiko wrote: > A server has 3 interfaces: eth0, eth1, eth2. I've setup a bond12 with > mode adaptive-alb with eth1 and eth2. Now interfaces have: > iface eth0 inet static > address x.x.x.1 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > iface bond12 inet static > address x.x.x.2 > netmask

Re: debian installer 4k sectors

pee...@email.cz wrote: > Thank you. And what about logical sector 512b? Is that also bug in fdisk? No. That is how your harddrive presents itself to the world. It uses internal 4k sectors but the interface to the outside world uses 512b sectors. Most disks do this for greater compatibility with

Re: debian installer 4k sectors

Pavel Kosina wrote: > several times I tried install Debian stable/testing. I have MB Asrock > UEFI D1800B-ITX and HDD WD20EFRX. Debian installer /part where > partitioning and formatting happens/ never formats to correct sectors > 4k. It always formats to 512b: >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >