On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 09:47:44PM -0600, ktb wrote:
I'm looking into buying a computer with either a 366 or 400MHz Celeron
processor. It has an L2 cache size of 128 Kb. I've read somewhere that
an L2 cache under something like 512 kb, will slow down your computer if
there is more than 64 MB
k == ktb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
k I'm looking into buying a computer with either a 366 or 400MHz Celeron
k processor. It has an L2 cache size of 128 Kb. I've read somewhere that
k an L2 cache under something like 512 kb, will slow down your computer if
k there is more than 64 MB of RAM
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, ktb wrote:
processor. It has an L2 cache size of 128 Kb. I've read somewhere
that an L2 cache under something like 512 kb, will slow down your
computer if there is more than 64 MB of RAM added. On the other hand
Ancient problem. Only afflicts Pentiums under about 200
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
I'm looking into buying a computer with either a 366 or 400MHz Celeron
processor. It has an L2 cache size of 128 Kb. I've read somewhere that
an L2 cache under something like 512 kb, will slow down your computer if
there is more
you should have no problems, i cant imagine where you read that..
i am running 466 celerons with 256MB ram, and its _quite_ fast. it may be
true that not all of the memory is cached(i can't say wether it is or
not). On older i430TX boards(i have one) they could not cache memory
beyond 64MB, i
matt garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You certainly can use a Celeron with 64 MB or more physical memory.
The
Celeron and Pentium II are the same chip, except for the L2 cache size
(the Pentium II has a 512kb L2 cache and the Celeron a 128kb L2
cache).
One other difference is that the
On 21-Nov-1999, Martin Fluch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, luis wrote:
hello everybody:
which are the options to have recognized by linux more than 64 mb of ram?
i have put a line in /etc/lilo.conf, stating :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Peter Ross wrote:
On 21-Nov-1999, Martin Fluch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, if the kernel doesn't recognizes the RAM on board, then this is due to
some bug in the BIOS, which can't tell the kernel the right amount of RAM
(64MB)
On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 09:06:17PM +0100, luis wrote:
which are the options to have recognized by linux more than 64 mb of ram?
i have put a line in /etc/lilo.conf, stating :
append=mem=128m
You should read the HOWTOs before, it says that giving the whole RAM
is dangerous, because you run
hello everybody:
which are the options to have recognized by linux more than 64 mb of ram?
i have put a line in /etc/lilo.conf, stating :
append=mem=128m
are there other ways to accomplish it, maybe better ?
thanks a lot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, luis wrote:
hello everybody:
which are the options to have recognized by linux more than 64 mb of ram?
i have put a line in /etc/lilo.conf, stating :
append=mem=128m
are there other ways to accomplish it, maybe better ?
No,
recognizes 32 MB.
I tried all of the three DIMM banks, had a look at the BIOS options but
all without success. I also checked for BIOS updates that might be known
to fix this but nothing.
The board is an Elitegroup P5TX-A with Intel TX chipset. The 64 MB RAM
chip works well in another
without success. I also checked for BIOS updates that might be known
to fix this but nothing.
The board is an Elitegroup P5TX-A with Intel TX chipset. The 64 MB RAM
chip works well in another computer.
Any ideas how to get things working?
If the BIOS will not find it, there is nothing you can
success. I also checked for BIOS updates that might be known
to fix this but nothing.
The board is an Elitegroup P5TX-A with Intel TX chipset. The 64 MB RAM
chip works well in another computer.
Any ideas how to get things working?
TIA,
Thomas
--
Thomas Apel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key IDs
14 matches
Mail list logo
