, but this is the reason why people say
Before you do a major upgrade, always do a full backup. And be sure
you know how to do a full bare-metal restore from that backup, just
incase you actually need it!
Enjoy!
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
I am using Debian Lenny on a Dell Latitude D630 ( intel 965GM chipset with
integrated moblie intel GMA X3100) with all the latest updates but my videos
play slowly on vlc media player/totem player on full screen. On windows xp
sp3 there was no problem at all.
Could someone pls help me
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:52:14 +0530, Varun Paliwal wrote:
I am using Debian Lenny on a Dell Latitude D630 ( intel 965GM chipset
with integrated moblie intel GMA X3100) with all the latest updates but
my videos play slowly on vlc media player/totem player on full screen.
On windows xp sp3
New Tree - Mail de Novedades
Los
das Jueves entregamos Gratis
en la ciudad de La Plata pedidos cuyo
monto superen los U$S 300.
Para montos inferiores a U$S 300, se debern abonar $ 25. Los das
Martes y Viernes entregamos Gratis
en Galera Jardn
!--
NewTree wrote:
Visualizar
http://ns.engines.com.ar/verhtml/default.asp?pQN1_hG1GtzX4u76%26RLv08%26%3akeLvDiiVvLvjK4A22DryDIzHAHHb9SQJr006lAuFd1QW8Ol
este correo en web | Reenviar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
bruno wrote:
You need a filesystem with stable device id and inode number so that
faubackup can correctly find your files again. This may be violated by
I think you're on the money here. I'm going to live with the bug, as
otherwise faubackup is
Just two remarks:
in order to see hidden files (*nix: the ones with a . at the beginning
of their names) there is the -a switch of ls, e.g.,
ls -la /maxtor
to remove also the hidden files can become a little arduous, for a start use
rm -rf .??*
this will avoid to remove the directory
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:26:55 -0500, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Just two remarks:
in order to see hidden files (*nix: the ones with a . at the beginning
of their names) there is the -a switch of ls, e.g.,
ls -la /maxtor
to remove also the hidden files can become a little arduous, for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Powell wrote:
ls -la /maxtor
to remove also the hidden files can become a little arduous, for a start use
rm -rf .??*
OK I told a little lie...I used
umount /maxtor/
cd /maxtor/
rm -r *
cd
mount /maxtor/
Problem solved...
Thanks!
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:48:51 -0500, Tim Beauregard wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
ls -la /maxtor
to remove also the hidden files can become a little arduous, for a start
use
rm -rf .??*
OK I told a little lie...I used
umount /maxtor/
cd /maxtor/
rm -r *
cd
mount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apologies if the first message wasn't clear enough:
df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 56G 55G 0 100% /
tmpfs 237M 0 237M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 10M 696K
El Wednesday 27 January 2010 09:45:55 Tim Beauregard va escriure:
Apologies if the first message wasn't clear enough:
df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 56G 55G 0 100% /
tmpfs 237M 0 237M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Olive wrote:
Maybe you copied /document files to /documents without being hdb1 monuted?
Try to umount /documents and see if there are still all files.
t...@server:~$ umount /documents
t...@server:~$ ls -l /documents/
total 0
As expected?
El Wednesday 27 January 2010 12:20:28 Tim Beauregard va escriure:
Marc Olive wrote:
Maybe you copied /document files to /documents without being hdb1
monuted? Try to umount /documents and see if there are still all files.
t...@server:~$ umount /documents
t...@server:~$ ls -l /documents/
What is the result of
umount /documents
umount /maxtor
du -x --max-depth=1 / | sort -n
?
(Don't forget to remount /dev/hdb1 and /dev/sda1 ;-)
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
du -sh /documents
-Original Message-
From: Marc Olive [mailto:marc.ol...@grupblau.com]
Sent: January 27, 2010 6:26 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Root filesystem full; faubackup problem?
El Wednesday 27 January 2010 12:20:28 Tim Beauregard va escriure:
Marc Olive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Wu wrote:
I wouldn't dismiss what Marc was onto. If you do the math, 44G in
/documents + 11G in the rest of / == 55G, seems to be a bit more than
coincidence. I know you already tried ls -l /documents/ after you
umounted but just for
Tim Beauregard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Wu wrote:
I wouldn't dismiss what Marc was onto. If you do the math, 44G in
/documents + 11G in the rest of / == 55G, seems to be a bit more than
coincidence. I know you already tried ls -l /documents/ after you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
My headless home file server (running stable, 2.6.26-2-686) suddenly
developed a No space left on device error in the / root directory. df
reports /dev/hda1 (root directory) to be full; this is a 60GB disc. du
- -ch however reports
Tim Beauregard put forth on 1/26/2010 6:33 PM:
If anyone has any suggestions I would be very grateful.
Yes. I have a suggestion. Post _RELEVANT_ data. Show us the output of df -h
and du -ch.
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
hello,
I have had this problem a couple of time. df and du output would not match.
This is due to the way du and df count. See here for explanations :
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/freebsd-why-command-df-and-du-reports-different-output.html
It would be easier to answer the question if you provided specific
examples of packages that apt-get didn't install and aptitude did. A
full copy/paste of the upgrade preview from both programs would be
particularly helpful.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
Javier Barroso javibarr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/02/2010 04:49 PM, Mumia W.. wrote:
I just upgraded Squeeze, but I had to use apt-get rather than aptitude
because aptitude wanted to force me to install a lot of new programs (do
a full-upgrade).
[...]
I'm not sure, but maybe aptitude wants
Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de
On 01/02/2010 04:49 PM, Mumia W.. wrote:
I just upgraded Squeeze, but I had to use apt-get rather than aptitude
because aptitude wanted to force me to install a lot of new programs (do
a full-upgrade).
[...]
The difference between safe-upgrade and full
(do a full-upgrade).
[...]
I'm not sure, but maybe aptitude wants to install recommends. If you
run aptitude -s -R safe-upgrade, it want to install all new stuff ?
Thanks. I have recommends disabled:
FYI:
Unless you are on netbook or very resource limitted PC, I think disabling
recommends
I just upgraded Squeeze, but I had to use apt-get rather than aptitude
because aptitude wanted to force me to install a lot of new programs (do
a full-upgrade).
I specifically entered the command aptitude safe-upgrade; however, it
wanted to install a lot of extra packages--many more than apt
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Mumia W..
paduille.4061.mumia.w+nos...@earthlink.net wrote:
I just upgraded Squeeze, but I had to use apt-get rather than aptitude
because aptitude wanted to force me to install a lot of new programs (do a
full-upgrade).
I specifically entered the command
Mumia W..:
I just upgraded Squeeze, but I had to use apt-get rather than aptitude
because aptitude wanted to force me to install a lot of new programs (do
a full-upgrade).
The difference between safe-upgrade and full-upgrade is that the
latter may *remove* packages in order to upgrade
Dear All
Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I clean my Debian server
disk as it is near to running disk full ? Please find below my current disk
usage report :
r...@hp001cc42a6011:/tmp# df -m
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
rootfs 456 316 117 74% /
/dev/root
hadi motamedi schreef:
Dear All
Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I clean my Debian
server disk as it is near to running disk full ? Please find below my
current disk usage report :
r...@hp001cc42a6011:/tmp# df -m
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
rootfs
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:12:02PM +0100, Raven ra...@vp44.net was heard to
say:
What I wanted to know is if aptitude, when removing mysql-server-5.0,
keeps the data files and makes them available in v5.1.
I can't tell you the answer to that because aptitude does not make
that decision; the
Hi all.
This is a production server running debian testing. It's been a while and
I wanted to update the system. Unfortunately it seems that some packages
are BROKEN:
The following packages are BROKEN:
mysql-client-5.1 php5-geoip php5-imagick php5-suhosin php5-xcache
The following NEW packages
Raven wrote:
Hi all.
This is a production server running debian testing. It's been a while and
I wanted to update the system. Unfortunately it seems that some packages
are BROKEN:
your braver than i am. thats the reason why noone should *ever* use
testing on a production machine. does it
Raven wrote:
Hi all.
This is a production server running debian testing. It's been a while and
I wanted to update the system. Unfortunately it seems that some packages
are BROKEN:
What happens if you just do safe-upgrade instead of full-upgrade?
--
Please reply to this list only. I read
.
This is a production server running debian testing. It's been a while and
I wanted to update the system. Unfortunately it seems that some packages
are BROKEN:
What happens if you just do safe-upgrade instead of full-upgrade?
--
Why stop now just when I'm hating it? -- Marvin The Paranoid Android
Hi list,
I wanted to test cupt [1], and then I tried a full-upgrade.
aptitude is not capable to resolve dependencies, but cupt yes. Like
cupt is very new, I would like to ask about why do you think this diff
is here:
# LANG=C aptitude full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building
On 2009-09-23 08:49 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
I wanted to test cupt [1], and then I tried a full-upgrade.
aptitude is not capable to resolve dependencies, but cupt yes. Like
cupt is very new, I would like to ask about why do you think this diff
is here:
# LANG=C aptitude full-upgrade
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2009-09-23 08:49 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
I wanted to test cupt [1], and then I tried a full-upgrade.
aptitude is not capable to resolve dependencies, but cupt yes. Like
cupt is very new, I would like to ask about
Hola amigos.
Necesito me ayuden a crear una ACL en squid para permitir y/o denegar el acceso
full a un grupo de peronas.
uso debian + squid3.
Les agradezco cualquier ayuda.
El 14 de septiembre de 2009 11:07, ppr zz arvic1...@yahoo.es escribió:
Hola amigos.
Necesito me ayuden a crear una ACL en squid para permitir y/o denegar el
acceso full a un grupo de peronas.
uso debian + squid3.
http://www.squid-cache.org/ aquí encontrarás de todo, sobre todo en
la
My /var/log/syslog is full of messages such as
Sep 7 23:36:32 kusumanchi kernel: [279482.279985] wlan0: switched to short
barker preamble (BSSID=00:23:97:5c:5f:e0)
Sep 7 23:36:33 kusumanchi kernel: [279484.023153] wlan0: switched to long
barker preamble (BSSID=00:23:97:5c:5f:e0)
Sep 7 23:37:06
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM, martin f krafftmadd...@debian.org wrote:
Have you ever modified the partition table to increase the size of
the partition?
yes I replaced the two 40 GB Disks with 2 80GB Disks
Have you made a backup?
no
Does it work if you unmount /var and then try
Hi,
I have two hard disks hda and hdc.
The partition sizes are as follows according to cfdisk.
Disk Drive: /dev/hda
Size: 80026361856 bytes, 80.0 GB
Heads: 255 Sectors per Track: 63 Cylinders: 9729
NameFlags
also sprach Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com [2009.06.11.1511 +0200]:
~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2 953M 519M 435M 55% /
tmpfs 237M 0 237M 0% /lib/init/rw
tmpfs 237M 0 237M 0% /dev/shm
also sprach martin f krafft madd...@debian.org [2009.06.11.1526 +0200]:
I assume that this is due to open file descriptors; Linux frees
diskspace only after a file descriptor is closed, not when the file
is unlinked from a directory.
Sorry, I misread. Does
mdadm -D /dev/md6
reflect the
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:08 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
also sprach martin f krafft madd...@debian.org [2009.06.11.1526 +0200]:
I assume that this is due to open file descriptors; Linux frees
diskspace only after a file descriptor is closed, not when the file
is unlinked
also sprach Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com [2009.06.11.1556 +0200]:
mdadm -D /dev/md6
does not show the right size either.
Have you ever modified the partition table to increase the size of
the partition? If yes, then I assume you did not recreate the array
then and since the superblock is
lenny aparece isso
May 2 15:52:34 debian kernel: cciss: fifo full
O que da para fazer???
estou usando debian etch com kernel do xen.
debian:/var/log# uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.18.8-xen #1 SMP Sat Feb 21 12:34:48 BRT 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
debian:/var/log#
Sinto tb uma performance baixa nos
: fifo full
O que da para fazer???
estou usando debian etch com kernel do xen.
debian:/var/log# uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.18.8-xen #1 SMP Sat Feb 21 12:34:48 BRT 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
debian:/var/log#
Sinto tb uma performance baixa nos discos, tanto em raid1 quanto em
raid0. Como por exemplo taxa de
Dear all, I have HP DL380 G4 with installed debian sarge. I want to
make full back up of system? before reinstalling to debian lenny.
But server using hardware raid. and my question is. how can i take
full backup, that in case of any failure i will be able to restore
system and it was just before
From: Daniel Suleyman [mailto:danik...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:46 AM
Subject: full backup/
Dear all, I have HP DL380 G4 with installed debian sarge. I want to
make full back up of system? before reinstalling to debian lenny.
But server using hardware raid. and my question
Hello,
On Debian Testing, when I turn full headers on in Iceape (Thunderbird),
there is no scroll bar in the header section and if the header of a
message has a lot of lines the lower lines are just not visible.
Is this just me or is this a common problem? If the latter, it is a *way
old
2008/11/15 H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
On Debian Testing, when I turn full headers on in Iceape (Thunderbird),
there is no scroll bar in the header section and if the header of a
message has a lot of lines the lower lines are just not visible.
Is this just me or is this a common problem
I forgot to mention, there exists an extension that fixes the issue.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I forgot to mention, there exists an extension that fixes the issue.
hey thanks for that! it always was annoying to have to resize the view
to be able to view headers.. not anymore!
--
Steve Reilly
http://reillyblog.com
Any people anywhere, being inclined, and
On 10/13/2008 09:04 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I think (its been many years since I tried) that most if not all X apps
will accept a --geometry setting on the command line. Once you get that
right, there's a file (I forget the name) in your home directory that
maps Xresources (that may be the
I'd like to run a single application (tellico) full-screen in a
dedicated VNC session *without* a window manager. I'm not sure how to
force the application to be full-screen, though.
If my xstartup contains exec tellico, it launches properly but only
takes up a fraction of the screen
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 06:13:38PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I'd like to run a single application (tellico) full-screen in a
dedicated VNC session *without* a window manager. I'm not sure how to
force the application to be full-screen, though.
If my xstartup contains exec tellico
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 06:13:38PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I'd like to run a single application (tellico) full-screen in a
dedicated VNC session *without* a window manager. I'm not sure how to
force the application to be full-screen, though.
If my xstartup contains
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 18:27:19 +0100, michael wrote:
I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600
card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use
'gv' to display an IDL-produced plot it gives a partial plot, the cursor
shows that
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 19:01 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 18:27:19 +0100, michael wrote:
I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600
card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use
'gv' to display an IDL-produced plot
I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600
card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use
'gv' to display an IDL-produced plot it gives a partial plot, the cursor
shows that interpretting is progressing but it never completes the plot.
(If I
Bonjour à tous,
Je souhaite afficher mon bureau Linux sur ma TV (1080p fullHD et 100Hz)
afin de pouvoir y lire mes films car mon lecteur dvd/divx ne prenant pas
en charge les fichiers mkv.
J'ai trouvé plusieurs éléments sur le net pour le standard Tv par
exemple (HD1080p) mais j'ignore
Revolver Onslaught a écrit :
Bonjour à tous,
Je souhaite afficher mon bureau Linux sur ma TV (1080p fullHD et
100Hz) afin de pouvoir y lire mes films car mon lecteur dvd/divx ne
prenant pas en charge les fichiers mkv.
J'ai trouvé plusieurs éléments sur le net pour le standard Tv par
This is a good howto, and enough for me to get a basic, working, preseed
file but I'd like a full reference to all the questions/options like
with kickstart above?
Thanks
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/apbs04.html.en
This is a good howto, and enough for me to get a basic, working, preseed
file but I'd like a full reference to all the questions/options like
with kickstart above?
AFAIK, any debconf options can be set in the preseed file.
If you install the debconf-utils package, and then run
is
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apbs04.html.en
This is a good howto, and enough for me to get a basic, working, preseed
file but I'd like a full reference to all the questions/options like
with kickstart above?
cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Chris.
==
I contend that we
to get a basic, working,
preseed file but I'd like a full reference to all the
questions/options like with kickstart above?
There are just too many options to document and an added issue is that a
lot of them are not under the D-I team's control. Any attempt to document
them all by us would
My dear colleague
Are u still buying Brandeddrugs?
Is BrandName is enough reason for huge spendings?
Don't befool. Act smartly.
u can save upto eightly percent on all your medicinesbills
don't miss the opportunity
act now
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcqp5cwg_0cr2dkbgz
There is no
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:12:26PM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
* From: frits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The idea of different users is not really usable. I use my systems to
work.
this is interesting: it is the first time that I hear about unix
multiuser capabilities (to run applications
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:58:08PM +, frits wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:12:26PM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
* From: frits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The idea of different users is not really usable. I use my systems to
work.
Can you elaborate?
I read it as role-based internet
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:28:03AM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
* From: frits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
allowed to include the applications in the firewall rules.
man iptables in etch still shows
owner
This module attempts to match various characteristics of the packet
* From: frits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The idea of different users is not really usable. I use my systems to
work.
this is interesting: it is the first time that I hear about unix
multiuser capabilities (to run applications side by side as different
users) being not really usable. Can you
Hello,
I used to run kernel 2.6.13 because it had the old iptables, that
allowed to include the applications in the firewall rules.
Since 2.6.13 is a bit old I decided to leave it behind. However, I like
the functionality. I want to be able to select which applications can
connect to the
* From: frits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
allowed to include the applications in the firewall rules.
man iptables in etch still shows
owner
This module attempts to match various characteristics of the packet
creator, for locally-
generated packets.
besides,
grep -i owner
manually run 'dpkg --configure -a'
to correct the problem.
So, I tried running dpkg --configure -a, which gave me:
dpkg: failed to write status record about `vlc-nox' to
`/var/lib/dpkg/status': No space left on device
I ran df, and I found that my /var partition is entirely full (1.9 GB
of 1.9 GB). I
, and I found that my /var partition is entirely full (1.9 GB
of 1.9 GB). I don't know why - last night I ran 'aptitude
safe-upgrade', maybe that has something to do with it? I'm not sure
how to fix this problem - I'm assuming that I should pare down some
files, but I'm not sure which ones
Kyle Barbour:
dpkg: failed to write status record about `vlc-nox' to
`/var/lib/dpkg/status': No space left on device
Run 'apt-get clean' and see how much free space you get. Apt stores
downloaded debs locally and never deletes them until asked to do so.
J.
--
I have been manipulated and
left on device
I ran df, and I found that my /var partition is entirely full (1.9 GB
of 1.9 GB). I don't know why - last night I ran 'aptitude
safe-upgrade', maybe that has something to do with it? I'm not sure
how to fix this problem - I'm assuming that I should pare down some
files, but I'm
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 04:53:45PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
There's got to be a way to delete old/un-needed .deb files. Using
apt-get, it's:
# apt-get clean
'clean' will remove all .deb files. I think it's better to use
autoclean.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you
Guys- got a big problem.
I had my / lvm partition reported as being out of diskspace.
I deleted a lot of the files...you can see below
I have about 30gig free..but it is still being reported as full..
Can anyone help me ???
thanks
machine:~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use
Michael Habashy wrote:
I had my / lvm partition reported as being out of diskspace.
I deleted a lot of the files...you can see below
I have about 30gig free..but it is still being reported as full..
Ext2/Ext3 filesystems have a percentage of space reserved
for emergencies. You can change
On Wed March 12 2008 12:22:24 Michael Habashy wrote:
I had my / lvm partition reported as being out of diskspace.
I deleted a lot of the files...you can see below
I have about 30gig free..but it is still being reported as full..
Ext2/Ext3 filesystems have a percentage of space reserved
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed March 12 2008 12:22:24 Michael Habashy wrote:
I had my / lvm partition reported as being out of diskspace.
I deleted a lot of the files...you can see below
I have about 30gig free..but it is still being reported as full..
Ext2/Ext3 filesystems
of the files...you can see below
I have about 30gig free..but it is still being reported as full..
Ext2/Ext3 filesystems have a percentage of space reserved
for emergencies. You can change the percentage with
tune2fs -m number. You can do this safely at any time,
even when
PM, Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed March 12 2008 12:22:24 Michael Habashy wrote:
I had my / lvm partition reported as being out of diskspace.
I deleted a lot of the files...you can see below
I have about 30gig free..but it is still being reported as full..
Ext2/Ext3
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:03:47PM -0400, Michael Habashy wrote:
Bless you guys.
that was it...
now you just need to find out how you filled up 700+G and deal with
preventing it in the future... ;)
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:03:47PM -0400, Michael Habashy wrote:
Bless you guys.
that was it...
now you just need to find out how you filled up 700+G and deal with
preventing it in the future... ;)
A
Ah. Yes, a very good point! A slight fact I
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:31:23PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:03:47PM -0400, Michael Habashy wrote:
Bless you guys.
that was it...
now you just need to find out how you filled up 700+G and deal with
preventing it in the
Full DVD - BEST Porn DVD- ENTER DANS Full-DVD.COM. Dvd vidéo , Dvd Amateur ,
Dvd Anal , Dvd Asiatique , Dvd Grosses Bites , Dvd Bisexuels , Dvd Black , Dvd
Blondes , Dvd Brunes ...
http://www.full-dvd.com
--
This message was sent on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] at openSubscriber.com
http
El Jueves, 6 de Marzo de 2008 23:55:52 alejandro escribió:
Hola a todos
jejejejejejje si que soy fastidioso ya logre que el apache me corriera
sin
warning asuuu soy un error de capa 8 andante jejejjeje solo quería
agradecer a todos por sus ayudas pero tengo una pregunta el
Hola a todos
jejejejejejje si que soy fastidioso ya logre que el apache me corriera
sin
warning asuuu soy un error de capa 8 andante jejejjeje solo quería
agradecer a todos por sus ayudas pero tengo una pregunta el usuario de la
lista Carlos Alegria [EMAIL PROTECTED] me dijo que
Romain JACQUET wrote:
8 snip
I strongly believe it is a mplayer bug...
I have found a solution. The problem only occured when the aspect
ratio is dynamically changed using the gui.
The problem is not present when calling mplayer from the command line
with the good aspect. (i.e. mplayer
Romain JACQUET a écrit :
Romain JACQUET a écrit :
...
I strongly believe it is a mplayer bug...
I have found a solution. The problem only occured when the aspect ratio
is dynamically changed using the gui.
The problem is not present when calling mplayer from the command line
with the good
Romain JACQUET a écrit :
...
I have made some visuals to summarize the problem.
1. I display a video on the second screen. The video is 4:3 ratio
(resolution 320x240). I see a correct display (see
http://romainjacquet.free.fr/screenshot3.png) but all the screen
is not used.
First, happy new year to you.
Bob a écrit :
Mmm, can you verify your second screen has square pixels, this is
important, divide the horizontal resolution of the screen by the
physical width of the panel and the vertical resolution by the
physical height of the panel, you should get the same
= 1 which tells mplayer that your
display has square pixels?
Maybe I have forgotten to tell you something important. Even if
full-screen films are not correctly displayed, the gnome desktop is fine.
Mplayer default display is 4:3. Maybe the default aspect ratio is the
ratio of the first screen
of the panel, you should get the same number.
Maybe I have forgotten to tell you something important. Even if
full-screen films are not correctly displayed, the gnome desktop is fine.
Mplayer default display is 4:3. Maybe the default aspect ratio is the
ratio of the first screen (1280/1024 = 4/3
Bob a écrit :
Romain JACQUET wrote:
Hello,
I'm playing with the experimental version of xserver-xorg-video-ati
(6.7.196-2).
I'm using a big desktop configuration with a LCD computer screen on
the vga output and LCD TV on the DVI output.
I want to use the TV screen to watch films.
When I
Romain JACQUET wrote:
Bob a écrit :
Romain JACQUET wrote:
Hello,
When I play a video on the first screen, the video is fine. But I
want to play a video on the second screen, I choose
the 16:9 aspect ratio in gmplayer, the video is shifted to the up of
the screen. It mean I see a black
901 - 1000 of 1785 matches
Mail list logo
