Hi there,
So here's what I did finally:
Got two rental server at https://www.scaleway.com/, one is arm64
(without armhf support) and Paris datacenter still have old hardware for
rent that's armhf based.
Both cost me around 6€ a month, so that's quite a good offer. Both
machines have 4 cores
Right, 1Gb and slow I/O, that's definitely a block for building Java
stuff...
On 08/29/2017 06:31 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi there,
On 08/29/2017 06:07 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
Could be an alternative indeed, but what about the speed compared to
my quad-core i5 with qemu ?
I haven't
Hi,
I was not aware of this optional 32 bit compatibility. That kinda sucks.
Actually, I'm already using qemu with cowbuilder (I mean, a lot) but my
biggest problem is not the slowness but the broken thread
implementation. It's nearly impossible to get something built with Java
without any
Hi there,
On 08/29/2017 06:07 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
> Could be an alternative indeed, but what about the speed compared to
> my quad-core i5 with qemu ?
I haven't actually tried that specific comparison, but form my
experience a Pi tends to be a tiny bit faster in pure CPU
performance than qemu
On 08/29/2017 05:19 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi,
Am 29. August 2017 17:04:29 MESZ schrieb Adam Cecile :
I was not aware of this optional 32 bit compatibility. That kinda
sucks.
Yeah, especially since you had the misfortune of getting the one chip that is
sold that
Hi,
Am 29. August 2017 17:04:29 MESZ schrieb Adam Cecile :
>I was not aware of this optional 32 bit compatibility. That kinda
>sucks.
Yeah, especially since you had the misfortune of getting the one chip that is
sold that doesn't support it.
>Actually, I'm already using
Hi,
32bit ARM compatibility is optional according to the specification,
and if your CPU doesn't support it, you won't be able to natively
run armhf executables. This is in contrast to x86, where all[*]
64bit x86 CPUs also support running old 32bit programs.
From what I've read it appears to be
On 08/29/2017 10:50 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:49:40AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
I'm actually running arm64, not amd64 ;-)
My eyes are failing me then ☺.
Can you provide your /proc/cpuinfo then please?
Sure:
processor: 0
BogoMIPS: 200.00
Features: fp
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:49:40AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> > > I'm actually running arm64, not amd64 ;-)
> > My eyes are failing me then ☺.
> >
> > Can you provide your /proc/cpuinfo then please?
>
> Sure:
>
> processor: 0
> BogoMIPS: 200.00
> Features: fp asimd
On 08/29/2017 08:25 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:33:50 +0200
Hitec Adam Cecile wrote:
Hi,
I'm actually running arm64, not amd64 ;-)
My eyes are failing me then ☺.
Can you provide your /proc/cpuinfo then please?
Reco
Sure:
processor: 0
Hi.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:33:50 +0200
Hitec Adam Cecile wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm actually running arm64, not amd64 ;-)
My eyes are failing me then ☺.
Can you provide your /proc/cpuinfo then please?
Reco
Hi,
I'm actually running arm64, not amd64 ;-)
Le 28 août 2017 23:25:56 GMT+02:00, Reco a écrit :
> Hi.
>
>On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:50:17 +0200
>Adam Cécile wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to set up armhf on arm64 stretch but it does not
Reco wrote:
> The reason being - an executable binary contains CPU instructions that
> are suited to CPU of designated architecture only. In your example it's
> armv5. Your CPU is amd64 and its unable to interpret those - it can only
> understand i386 and amd64 instruction
Hi.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:50:17 +0200
Adam Cécile wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm trying to set up armhf on arm64 stretch but it does not work:
>
>
> file /tmp/bash/bin/bash
>
> /tmp/bash/bin/bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI5 version 1
> (SYSV),
Hello,
I'm trying to set up armhf on arm64 stretch but it does not work:
file /tmp/bash/bin/bash
/tmp/bash/bin/bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI5 version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3, for
GNU/Linux 3.2.0,
15 matches
Mail list logo