Re: [OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-19 Thread Lisi
On Sunday 12 August 2012 17:28:06 Chris Bannister wrote: Bring them all into the one room, and problem solved. Not necessarily. I have had experience of one person who routinely cross-posted, with the effect that all his threads were badly distorted: fragmented and nearly impossible to

[OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-12 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:45:29 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:05:56PM +, Camaleón wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:27:22 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote: (please, don't cross-post without warning the users about it) Huh? Since when? Since always (RFC1855¹): 3.1.2

Re: [OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 15:27 +, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:45:29 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:05:56PM +, Camaleón wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:27:22 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote: (please, don't cross-post without warning the users about

Re: [OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Long time no see :( debian-user@lists.debian.org joe1assis...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344787145.2207.67.camel@precise

Re: [OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-12 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 05:40:14PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Some days ago I cross-posted, apologized and warned! It's anyway not the best idea to do so. Excepted of some announcements cross-posting isn't a good idea, sometimes it's just less work for the person who does the post, but it

Re: [OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-12 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 03:27:25PM +, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:45:29 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: Besides, it is obvious in the headers whether the message is cross posted, the warning is hence redundant, extra typing, and therefore unnecessary. Not that obvious!

Re: [OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-12 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 04:31:40 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 03:27:25PM +, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:45:29 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: Besides, it is obvious in the headers whether the message is cross posted, the warning is hence redundant, extra

Re: [OT] Cross-posting (was: package wxmacmolplt broken)

2012-08-12 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 13 aug 12, 04:31:40, Chris Bannister wrote: All I can suggest is that you get a better MUA. I mean what MUA doesn't show you (at least) the CC header? When I'm reading -user (or any other mailing list for the matter) I generally pay no attention at all to the headers. Kind regards,