I use apt-get on my Red Hat servers that need auto updating. I dont trust
RH Network. It has broken at least a dozen servers that I know of, none
of them are mine of course. You can get a really great implimentation of
apt-get for Red Hat at http://www.freshrpms.net.
--
Arthur H. Johnson II
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 09:26:54AM -0400, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
|
| I use apt-get on my Red Hat servers that need auto updating.
How much memory do they have? How long does an 'apt-get anything' take
to run, compared to debian with equivalent hardware? (not including
any network
On Thu 06 Jun 02 15:45, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 12:48:15PM -0600, user list wrote:
[snip]
| The reasons I like [debian] are:
| 1. apt-get
[snip]
| I'll note in passing that the first reason has lost some edge now
| that RH 7.3 comes with apt-get and that
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 23:55:31 -0500
Glen Lee Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is apt-get on RH 7.3 actually usable?
Red Hat isn't likely to seriously support apt-get. They're pushing
up2date, which updates your computer for you. It's free for the first
computer you sign up for, but
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 12:48:15PM -0600, user list wrote:
[snip]
| The reasons I like [debian] are:
| 1. apt-get
[snip]
| I'll note in passing that the first reason has lost some edge now that
| RH 7.3 comes with apt-get and that there are ports to older RH releases.
[snip]
Is apt-get on RH 7.3
5 matches
Mail list logo
