Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:05:13PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: Reminds me of a self-deprecating joke I heard in Canada once. Canada could have been good. It could have had British culture, French cuisine and American technology. Instead, it got American culture, British cuisine and French

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Nano Nano
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 05:27:02AM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: I have heard that joke too. There is a similarity between the Russian technology and the French technology. The west was surprised when the Russians put the sputnik in the skies. When taken care of can be amazingly powerful and

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:40:55AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: those books, I didn't see any superiority between any culture in terms of maths, or types of maths. Mathematics is one in the sense that it describes the same reality. The approach to it may be different. No claim of superiority. Only

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread David P James
On February 20, 2004 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: I swear to Christ, when I was in France, I said to myself: PLEASE GOD PLEASE get me back to my land of 500 channels of pablum, my

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Paul Morgan
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:05:13 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: I swear to Christ, when I was in France, I said to myself: PLEASE GOD PLEASE get me back to my land of 500 channels of pablum,

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Marty Landman: At 02:37 PM 2/18/2004, s. keeling wrote: Of course, there's a lot of people from where I'm from who would dispute the suggestion that English is spoken anywhere in the US. Heh. Just shows how jealous they all are of what we've managed to do with it since

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Marty Landman
At 12:39 PM 2/19/2004, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Marty Landman: Heh. Just shows how jealous they all are of what we've managed to do with it since taking it over 200+ years ago. :) As in KMart, Kwikee-Mart, Walmart, KTel, garnished [sic] wages, and PATRIOT Act? :-P Doh! Nice of you not

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:02:53PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: Nice of you not to mention the {W} really embarrassing stuff. :) That's OK. It's 2004. The people will vote their own regime change soon enough. I fear W may be a petty tyrant and

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Marty Landman
At 02:14 PM 2/19/2004, Paul Johnson wrote: The people will vote their own regime change soon enough. From your mouth to God's ear, Paul. I fear W may be a petty tyrant and refuse to step down, however. Hah, funny. Nice plot idea for Arnold Schwarzenegger's next film, huh? Marty Landman Face 2

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:32:41PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: I fear W may be a petty tyrant and refuse to step down, however. Hah, funny. Nice plot idea for Arnold Schwarzenegger's next film, huh? Well, like I said, I fear it might not be a

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Steve Lamb
Paul Johnson wrote: Well, like I said, I fear it might not be a movie, but what's on Northwest Cable News. Sad part is people said the same about Clinton. I wasn't old enough to care if the same was said about Bush, Reagan or Carter before him. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread CW Harris
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:14:36AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:02:53PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: Nice of you not to mention the {W} really embarrassing stuff. :) That's OK. It's 2004. The people will vote their own regime change soon enough. I fear W may be a

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Nano Nano
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 10:39:44AM -0700, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Marty Landman: At 02:37 PM 2/18/2004, s. keeling wrote: Of course, there's a lot of people from where I'm from who would dispute the suggestion that English is spoken anywhere in the US. Heh. Just shows how

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:07:21 -0800, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Paul Johnson wrote: Well, like I said, I fear it might not be a movie, but what's on Northwest Cable News. Sad part is people said the same about Clinton. I wasn't old enough to care

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:12:25PM -0700, CW Harris wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:14:36AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:02:53PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: Nice of you not to mention the {W} really embarrassing stuff.

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: I swear to Christ, when I was in France, I said to myself: PLEASE GOD PLEASE get me back to my land of 500 channels of pablum, my 24-hour Walmart, my drivethroughs, my land of fakeness

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Steve Lamb: Marty Landman wrote: At 01:01 PM 2/18/2004, Paul Johnson wrote: you just can't make it without English in the US. I don't know about that Paul; growing up in Brooklyn seemed to me like everyone did quite nicely thank you. I was unaware that Brooklyn was

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Lamb
s. keeling wrote: When I read Marty's reply, it seemed more a play on the idea that Brooklyn-ites don't actually speak English. Of course, there's a lot of people from where I'm from who would dispute the suggestion that English is spoken anywhere in the US. I imagine the British might go even

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:37:06PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: Ah. You're mixing up subset and superset. Paul said you can't make it in the US, which includes the subset Brooklyn. Take all the major multilingual cities combined and it still comes up

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread Marty Landman
At 02:37 PM 2/18/2004, s. keeling wrote: Marty called him on it and noted English is not necessary in Brooklyn, a subset of the US, thereby disproving Paul's assumption. Provided we really consider Brooklyn a proper subset of the US; this was still the subject of much heated debate at the time