On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 22:24 +, Tom H wrote:
apt-cache policy
Thank you, that's a useful command :).
--
Windows 8 Pro floppy disk 1
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-December/255074.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 22:24 +, Tom H wrote:
apt-cache policy
Thank you, that's a useful command :).
You're welcome.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 03:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to the preferences
too, or do they belong to wheezy?
I still don't know and will see when there are upgrades available, but
perhaps somebody can answer this question. Since for upgraded
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
with different settings backports always got a lower priority than
jessie/testing.
Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than jessie/testing?
Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
with different settings backports always got a lower priority than
jessie/testing.
Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than
Hi,
with different settings backports always got a lower priority than
jessie/testing.
Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than jessie/testing?
Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to the preferences
too, or do they belong to wheezy?
Among others I tested
6 matches
Mail list logo