Re: Backports pinning

2013-12-21 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 22:24 +, Tom H wrote: apt-cache policy Thank you, that's a useful command :). -- Windows 8 Pro floppy disk 1 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-December/255074.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Backports pinning

2013-12-21 Thread Tom H
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 22:24 +, Tom H wrote: apt-cache policy Thank you, that's a useful command :). You're welcome. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

[seemingly solved] Backports pinning

2013-12-20 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 03:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to the preferences too, or do they belong to wheezy? I still don't know and will see when there are upgrades available, but perhaps somebody can answer this question. Since for upgraded

Re: Backports pinning

2013-12-20 Thread Tom H
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: with different settings backports always got a lower priority than jessie/testing. Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than jessie/testing? Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to

Re: Backports pinning

2013-12-20 Thread Tom H
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: with different settings backports always got a lower priority than jessie/testing. Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than

Backports pinning

2013-12-19 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Hi, with different settings backports always got a lower priority than jessie/testing. Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than jessie/testing? Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to the preferences too, or do they belong to wheezy? Among others I tested