Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-13 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 8:18 AM Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:48 PM Xiyue Deng wrote: >> >> You can check the developer page of zfs-linux[1] on which the "action >> needed" section has information about security issues (along with >> version info as Gareth posted). The

Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-12 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sat 13/01/2024 at 02:32, Gareth Evans wrote: > use of the actual "stable-backports" repo is not > recommended or implied. "implied" might be debatable given that was indeed my first thought, but not intended to be implied, it seems. Certainly not necessary.

Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-12 Thread Gareth Evans
On Fri 12/01/2024 at 06:49, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > ... > It is far more concerning that one cannot trust that cp actually copies a > file, and this is a blocker for installing the ZFS packages in Debian. The update in bookworm-backports to 2.2.2-3 allegedly fixes this issue. I have installed

Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-12 Thread Махно
>I have not seen this recommendation, do you have a link? It is from Debian wiki https://wiki.debian.org/ZFS 2024-01-12, pn, 14:08 Jan Ingvoldstad rašė: > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:48 PM Xiyue Deng wrote: >> >> >> You can check the developer page of zfs-linux[1] on which the "action >>

Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-11 Thread Jan Ingvoldstad
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:48 PM Xiyue Deng wrote: > > You can check the developer page of zfs-linux[1] on which the "action > needed" section has information about security issues (along with > version info as Gareth posted). The one you mentioned was being tracked > in [2] and the

Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-11 Thread Махно
It is recommended by Debian ZFS on Linux Team to install ZFS related packages from Backports archive. Upstream stable patches will be tracked and compatibility is always maintained. 2024-01-11, kt, 02:08 Xiyue Deng rašė: > > Jan Ingvoldstad writes: > > > Hi, > > > > It seems that Bookworm's

Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-10 Thread Xiyue Deng
Jan Ingvoldstad writes: > Hi, > > It seems that Bookworm's zfs-dkms package (from contrib) has the data > corruption bug that was fixed with OpenZFS 2.1.14 (and 2.2.2) on 2023-11-30. > > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.1.14 > > However, I see no relevant bug report in the bug

Re: Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-10 Thread Gareth Evans
> On 9 Jan 2024, at 06:41, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: >  > Hi, > > It seems that Bookworm's zfs-dkms package (from contrib) has the data > corruption bug that was fixed with OpenZFS 2.1.14 (and 2.2.2) on 2023-11-30. > > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.1.14 > > However, I see no

Bookworm and ZFS (zfs-dkms 2.1.11) data corruption bug

2024-01-08 Thread Jan Ingvoldstad
Hi, It seems that Bookworm's zfs-dkms package (from contrib) has the data corruption bug that was fixed with OpenZFS 2.1.14 (and 2.2.2) on 2023-11-30. https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.1.14 However, I see no relevant bug report in the bug tracker - have my searching skills