On 08/04/13 20:59, Rob Owens wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:30:52AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
As for as OCR vs retyping vs scan and preses - still up in the air
at this point. I suspect that all three methods might be used.
There are commercial companies that will do bulk scanning and OCR.
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 01:57:51PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
Hi all,
I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start.
There are 100 years of records that include hand written material,
type written hard copy, photos and a lot of email. I would like to
have a system based
On 04/07/2013 05:56 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 4/8/13, Gary Roachgary719_li...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi all,
I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start. There
are 100 years of records that include hand written material, type
written hard copy, photos and a lot of email.
On 4/8/13 7:30 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
Ok, the organization is the Unitarian Universalist Church of Long Beach
CA. We have been around since 1913. I recently got stuck with the job of
Church Historian and am concerned about the closet full of records going
back to day one.
[snip]
Is there a
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:30:52AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
As for as OCR vs retyping vs scan and preses - still up in the air
at this point. I suspect that all three methods might be used.
There are commercial companies that will do bulk scanning and OCR. I
used one in the past and I found
Hi all,
I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start. There
are 100 years of records that include hand written material, type
written hard copy, photos and a lot of email. I would like to have a
system based around mysql (if possible) that would allow flexible data
On 4/8/13, Gary Roach gary719_li...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi all,
I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start. There
are 100 years of records that include hand written material, type
written hard copy, photos and a lot of email. I would like to have a
system based around
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:49:51PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
It would be very nice if there was a universal
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
No. I figure a CD is good for at least a year. Every year, I
pull the two netinst cds from the bank, take an SHA hash and compare it
with the written notes, then run something like cdck on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
No. I figure a CD is good for at least a year. Every year, I
pull the two netinst cds from the bank, take an SHA hash and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/07 09:04, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
[snip]
True. However, for a small data set (under 1 GB) the need for three
copies means three hard drives. Using a hard drive and rewriting over
it means that you loose old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/25/07 09:04, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
[snip]
True. However, for a small data set (under 1 GB) the need for three
copies means three hard drives. Using a hard drive and rewriting over
it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/07 13:44, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
But isn't that putting all your eggs in one basket? (Unless I'm
mis-reading you.)
3 disks in three different locations (according to Douglas'
requirements). You'd have
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:49:51PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
It would be very nice if there was a universal cross-platform rw +
encrypt filesystem for archives. Something that you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 08:47, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:49:51PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
It would be very nice if there
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:03:15PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Never heard of ODF, or is it specific to *Office programmes?
Personally, I save my latex as latex. The origional contents are
plainly visible.
Never heard of ODF It's the OpenOffice.org 2.0 document format,
aka OASIS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 16:18, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:03:15PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Never heard of ODF, or is it specific to *Office programmes?
Personally, I save my latex as latex. The origional contents are
plainly
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:08:21PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
There is something to be said for casting something in plain text in
bronze and gold plating it.
Buffered lignin-free paper.
Burns.
Bronze melts.
Pottery breaks.
Acid rain eats granite.
I guess the bottom line is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 18:58, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:08:21PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
There is something to be said for casting something in plain text in
bronze and gold plating it.
Buffered lignin-free paper.
Burns.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
It would be very nice if there was a universal cross-platform rw +
encrypt filesystem for archives. Something that you could be confident
20 matches
Mail list logo
