Re: Dual Boot XP e Debian (Lilo)

2005-12-28 Thread Fred Ulisses Maranhao
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:17:34 -0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pessoal, Instalei o Debian na minha máquina aonde já tinha um XP em funcionamento, tudo bem, instalação correu sem problemas, instalei tudo com ReiserFS, três particões (/boot, swap e raiz) iniciou,tudo beleza. Depois dei um

Re: Dual Boot XP e Debian (Lilo)

2005-12-28 Thread Guilherme Rocha
de Guilherme Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] 26/12/2005 17:57 Para:Debian List debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org cc: Assunto:Re: Dual Boot XP e Debian (Lilo) Em 26/12/05, Fabio Guerrazzi[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: quote quem=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pessoal

Re: Dual Boot XP e Debian (Lilo)

2005-12-27 Thread unholycurse
dpkg nao funciona? #dpkg-reconfigure lilo so um palpite (ainda to sem meu linux to no work heh) Falow Em 26/12/05, Guilherme Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Em 26/12/05, Fabio Guerrazzi[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: quote quem= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pessoal, Instalei o Debian na minha máquina

Dual Boot XP e Debian (Lilo)

2005-12-26 Thread alexmarco
Pessoal, Instalei o Debian na minha máquina aonde já tinha um XP em funcionamento, tudo bem, instalação correu sem problemas, instalei tudo com ReiserFS, três particões (/boot, swap e raiz) iniciou,tudo beleza. Depois dei um apt-get remove grub e retirei o grub. Instalei o LILO com o comando

Re: Dual Boot XP e Debian (Lilo)

2005-12-26 Thread Fabio Guerrazzi
quote quem=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pessoal, Instalei o Debian na minha máquina aonde já tinha um XP em funcionamento, tudo bem, instalação correu sem problemas, instalei tudo com ReiserFS, três particões (/boot, swap e raiz) iniciou,tudo beleza. Depois dei um apt-get remove grub e retirei o grub.

Re: Dual Boot XP e Debian (Lilo)

2005-12-26 Thread Guilherme Rocha
Em 26/12/05, Fabio Guerrazzi[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: quote quem=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pessoal, Instalei o Debian na minha máquina aonde já tinha um XP em funcionamento, tudo bem, instalação correu sem problemas, instalei tudo com ReiserFS, três particões (/boot, swap e raiz) iniciou,tudo

Re: Debian/Lilo problem

2004-05-17 Thread David Baron
Try placing the root= in your mkinitrd.conf. # If this is set to probe mkinitrd will try to figure out what's needed to # mount the root file system. This is equivalent to the old PROBE=on setting. ROOT=/dev/hdb1 ext3 substitute your file system, ext2, etc. Quotes are necessary for correct

Debian/Lilo problem

2004-05-16 Thread Denis Croombs
I am trying to get a Debian system 3.0 to use a 2.4.16-k7 kernel I have added the kernel to lilo.conf entered the command lilo but get a error (I do not get the error if I try using the 2.2.20-idepci kernel) the error is:- request_module[block-major-3]: Root fs not mounted VFS: Cannot open root

Re: Debian/Lilo problem

2004-05-16 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
Hello, Denis, On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:02:27PM +0100, Denis Croombs wrote: I am trying to get a Debian system 3.0 to use a 2.4.16-k7 kernel I have added the kernel to lilo.conf entered the command lilo but get a error (I do not get the error if I try using the 2.2.20-idepci kernel) the

Re: Debian/Lilo problem

2004-05-16 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Denis Croombs wrote: I am using ext2 I have tried with and without initrd ! Is ext2 compiled into your kernel? If it is a module, you might need to add it to your initrd. If you have a serial console, a full boot output would help. Is it a standard

Re: Debian/Lilo problem

2004-05-16 Thread Ping Wing
in lilo.conf , enter line root=/dev/*d** for example root=/dev/hda1 cheers, http://www.axeltabs.com/ __ axel --- Denis Croombs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to get a Debian system 3.0 to use a 2.4.16-k7 kernel I have added the kernel to lilo.conf entered the command lilo but get a

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-07-02 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Ross Boylan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030629 00:24]: Here's the lilo.conf for debian that doesn't work for the RH sections. How does it not work? Does lilo not run (i.e. refuses to install in /dev/sda)? Do you get a LILO prompt? Does the kernel begin to load and but fail to load the initrd?

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-30 Thread Kevin McKinley
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:51:54 -0700 Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: image=/red/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.20-18.9smp label=linux initrd=/red/boot/initrd-2.4.20-18.9smp.img read-only append=hdb=ide-scsi root=LABEL=/ root=/dev/sda2 What's root=LABEL=/? I'd get rid of

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-30 Thread David
On Friday 27 June 2003 04:43 pm, Ross Boylan wrote: On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 13:39, Bijan Soleymani wrote: On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 12:51, Ross Boylan wrote: To clarify: I mounted the red hat partitions under /red when running Debian. My understanding is the lilo's map, and so it's boot

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-30 Thread Joey Hess
Aryan Ameri wrote: I don't have RedHat, so I can't verify that, but it seems we have the same problem. Any suggestions anyone? It sounds like these distributions are using an initrd, and your lilo setup is not passing the necessary parameters to the kernel to get it mounted, maybe? -- see

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-29 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 12:51, Ross Boylan wrote: To clarify: I mounted the red hat partitions under /red when running Debian. My understanding is the lilo's map, and so it's boot process, use absolute disk locations and so shouldn't care how I get to the files. The lilo.conf under Debian

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-29 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 13:39, Bijan Soleymani wrote: On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 12:51, Ross Boylan wrote: To clarify: I mounted the red hat partitions under /red when running Debian. My understanding is the lilo's map, and so it's boot process, use absolute disk locations and so shouldn't care

Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-29 Thread Ross Boylan
Here's the lilo.conf for debian that doesn't work for the RH sections. I've deleted 2 additional stanzas that are variations on the ones you see below: prompt timeout=50 #compact default=debian boot=/dev/sda lba32 install=/boot/boot-menu.b map=/boot/map vga=0xa image=/vmlinuz

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-29 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:51:54PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: image=/red/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.20-18.9smp label=linux initrd=/red/boot/initrd-2.4.20-18.9smp.img read-only append=hdb=ide-scsi root=LABEL=/ root=/dev/sda2

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-29 Thread Kevin McKinley
On 26 Jun 2003 17:57:34 -0700 Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a system with Red Hat 9 preinstalled, booting with lilo. After making some space, I installed Debian (testing) on it. I thought it would be good to preserve the ability to boot into RH, so I mounted its partitions

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-28 Thread Aryan Ameri
that option). I have the same problem with booting Mandrake 9.1 using Debian Lilo. I can boot other distros OK (like slack) but I get the same kernel panic message when booting mandrake 9.1 I don't have RedHat, so I can't verify that, but it seems we have the same problem. Any suggestions anyone? I

Re: Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-28 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 20:57, Ross Boylan wrote: I got a system with Red Hat 9 preinstalled, booting with lilo. After making some space, I installed Debian (testing) on it. I thought it would be good to preserve the ability to boot into RH, so I mounted its partitions under /red in linux this

Debian lilo won't boot Redhat

2003-06-27 Thread Ross Boylan
I got a system with Red Hat 9 preinstalled, booting with lilo. After making some space, I installed Debian (testing) on it. I thought it would be good to preserve the ability to boot into RH, so I mounted its partitions under /red in linux, and modified its lilo.conf to use these new paths.

Re: Re: Debian-lilo

2001-11-16 Thread Paolo Falcone
Graeme Orton wrote: Hi i have my hard drive partisioned. One for Linux (debian) and the other for windows. I had lilo configured to load windows as default and to stop it i pressed 'shift' to boot debian. I recently installed windows-xp professional and lilo load has dissapereard and i cant

Debian-lilo

2001-11-15 Thread Graeme Orton
Hi i have my hard drive partisioned. One for Linux (debian) and the other for windows. I had lilo configured to load windows as default and to stop it i pressed 'shift' to boot debian.I recently installed windows-xp professional and lilo load has dissapereard and i cant get in linux. Does

Re: Debian-lilo

2001-11-15 Thread ben
windows installations tend to take over the boot partition, and windows per se is unable to see anything but itself. if you've made a linux boot disk, you can get in and hack lilo. otherwise, i think you need to get hold of something like partition magic to restore the original mbr. i've never

Re: Debian-lilo

2001-11-15 Thread Joop Stakenborg
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:41:02 + Graeme Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi i have my hard drive partisioned. One for Linux (debian) and the other for windows. I had lilo configured to load windows as default and to stop it i pressed 'shift' to boot debian. I recently installed windows-xp

Re: Debian-lilo

2001-11-15 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Windows rewrites the MBR on install and makes itself the default OS by setting it's own partition active. To fix this you can either: 1) Boot from a Linux boot disk (such as you hopefully made during the Debian install) and reinstall Lilo. 2) Boot from a DOS/Win9XX boot disk and run fdisk to

Re: Debian-lilo

2001-11-15 Thread Martin Kacerovsky
Windows rewrites the MBR on install and makes itself the default OS by setting it's own partition active. To fix this you can either: 1) Boot from a Linux boot disk (such as you hopefully made during the Debian install) and reinstall Lilo. 1.5) Boot from debian Rescue disk, (mostly the

Instalacion Debian (LILO)

2001-08-07 Thread sierra21
Tengo en un PC un disco duro con 5 Mg para Win98 y 3 para Mandrake, el cual usa GRUB, ahora quiero instalar Debiann donde esta Mandrake y usar LILO, mi consulta es, ¿puedo instalar LILO en el MBR?, es que en la guia veo que no es recomendable si se tiene otro sistema operativo, si lo

Re: Instalacion Debian (LILO)

2001-08-07 Thread Jose Luis Jiménez
Hola Que yo sepa no hay ningún problema para instalar Lilo en el MBR, lo único es que cuando lo instales tendrás que modificar lilo.conf para meter la entrada de windows y el resto de SO que tengas (el único problema sería que no supieras como hacerlo). Yo en concreto tengo windows + Mandrake 8 +

RE: Instalacion Debian (LILO)

2001-08-07 Thread R. M. Alarcon
No veo porque no. La unica recomendacion si tiene un disco grande y bios vieja es crear una particion /boot cerca del comienzo del disco y copiar las imagenes de linuz ahi.Segun entiendo este problema (bios/disco/loader) no existe en grub.

Re: Instalacion Debian (LILO)

2001-08-07 Thread Alfonso
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Lista debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 2:55 PM Subject: Instalacion Debian (LILO) Tengo en un PC un disco duro con 5 Mg para Win98 y 3 para Mandrake, el cual usa GRUB, ahora quiero instalar Debiann donde esta Mandrake y usar LILO, mi

Debian LILO configuration

2001-07-10 Thread Ramachandran Chidambaram
I installed Debian 2.2 (Potato) from CD. Hard Disk has win 95(hda1)and linux (hda2)LiLo was installed in MBR.Pl advise to configure to load Windows and LINUX. Whithout losing contents on the HD. __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses

RE: trouble installing debian -LILO freezing

1999-01-20 Thread Brian Morgan
An addendum to my 2 previous posts. I can go all the way through setup: partitioning OK, loading devices OK, installs and configures base system OK. I chose not to configure PCMCIA support this time, and I've stopped getting the problem extracting Base System from /target/base2_1.tgz error

RE: trouble installing debian -LILO freezing

1999-01-20 Thread Brian Morgan
: Re: trouble installing debian -LILO freezing On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 03:25:11PM -0600, Brian Morgan wrote: An addendum to my 2 previous posts. I can go all the way through setup: partitioning OK, loading devices OK, installs and configures base system OK. I chose not to configure PCMCIA