Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-30 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 29 iun 21, 22:41:10, Gareth Evans wrote: > > Even if I had made use of upgrade rather than dist-upgrade, presumably > a dist-upgrade would have been indicated here (by the existence of > packages kept back) and the same position would have resulted - ie. > having to wait for a

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-29 Thread David Wright
On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 22:41:10 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > > But your evening run of apt-get -y

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-29 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 22:41, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-29 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was unconstrained, > > > and so shim-signed could be removed

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-29 Thread David Wright
On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote: > > > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was unconstrained, > > and so shim-signed could be removed because it was no longer being > > held onto as a Depends or

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-28 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote: > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was unconstrained, > and so shim-signed could be removed because it was no longer being > held onto as a Depends or Recommends. Except that `apt-get dist-upgrade` doesn't do that (`autoremove`

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-28 Thread David Wright
On Sun 27 Jun 2021 at 05:31:05 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > On Tue 22 Jun 2021, at 19:13, David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 08:59:13 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00 > > > daily) failed due to apt-listbugs

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-26 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 22 Jun 2021, at 19:13, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 08:59:13 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00 daily) > > failed due to apt-listbugs complaining about the boot-breaking bug in > > shim-signed, and pinning

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-22 Thread David Wright
On Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 08:59:13 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00 daily) > failed due to apt-listbugs complaining about the boot-breaking bug in > shim-signed, and pinning v1.33 in the process. > >