I wrote instructions on how to install and build egcs-1.1.2 on Debian potato
systems as part of instructions to compile and install A+
(http://aplusdev.org/Install/debian.html). Basically, it says to build and
install egcs in /usr/local/egcs/, then set your PATH to point at it while
building
The sysadmin really likes debian. So, I have the following questions.
1) Is there an egcs-2.91.66 binary for Debian?
If there is it would be in the slink era.
2) Are there any obvious issues with replacing gcc 2.95.4 with
egcs-2.91.66? I suppose another translation of this question
Hello,
I have a Debian system with gcc 2.95.4. However, I need egcs-2.91.66 (egcs
1.1.2 release).
I have downloaded egcs-2.91.66 and have attempted to compile the source.
Make all gives me large numbers of errors related to objects that are
part of various libraries.
I have a software
On Tue, 14 May 2002 17:21:01 -0700
John Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Debian system with gcc 2.95.4. However, I need egcs-2.91.66 (egcs
1.1.2 release).
There is a egcs 1.1.2 source package within Debian, under the name of
egcs1.1
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
At 10:04 am, Tuesday, October 9 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) mumbled:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:36:27 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Has anybody packaged egcs 1.1.2 for kernel compilation?
I did some work on it, but abandoned it as I've encountered no problems with
2.95.x in my configurations
Steve Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 10:04 am, Tuesday, October 9 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) mumbled:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:36:27 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Has anybody packaged egcs 1.1.2 for kernel compilation?
I did some work on it, but abandoned it as I've encountered
Has anybody packaged egcs 1.1.2 for kernel compilation? It's still
the official compiler for the Linux kernel, and there are definitely
problems when using GCC 2.95.x instead.
--
Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Stuttgart http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:36:27 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Has anybody packaged egcs 1.1.2 for kernel compilation?
I did some work on it, but abandoned it as I've encountered no problems with
2.95.x in my configurations. There's a diff at
http://www.cistron.nl/~jhm/egcs_1.1.2-0
I'm trying toi compile something and it seems to require egcs. I can't
find that package in the unstable dist. I did a search on egcs in
the debian packages also. No go.
Thoughts?
Robert
:wq!
---
Robert L. Harris
egcs is part of gcc 2.95.
http://gcc.gnu.org/
http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html#timeline
I'm trying toi compile something and it seems to require egcs. I can't
find that package in the unstable dist. I did a search on egcs in
the debian packages also. No go.
Thoughts?
Robert
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 04:55:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chaps,
Could someone out there please enlighten me on what the rpath does,
and how to it is used? I can't seem to find anything on it in the man or
info pages
kindest regards,
--ibs
See man ld, also info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone out there please enlighten me on what the rpath does,
and how to it is used? I can't seem to find anything on it in the man or
info pages
You'll find information in the man page for the linker - 'man ld'.
HTH,
--
Colin Watson
Chaps,
Could someone out there please enlighten me on what the rpath does,
and how to it is used? I can't seem to find anything on it in the man or
info pages
kindest regards,
--ibs
G'Day Folks,
A question from some newcomers to Debian (refugees from RPM database
problems under RedHat and Mandrake installations ;-)
We have some software that requires the g++ class template stuff found
in egcs (aka gcc 2.91.66). N.B. the later gcc 2.95.2 and 2.95.3
templates *BREAK* our
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 14:10:04 +0800, Frank Horowitz wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in getting egcs to co-exist iwth the mainstream gcc
packages in woody? If so, how?
The easiest way would be to build egcs for installation into different
locations than the regular ones, e.g.
mkdir
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:29:20PM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
:: staf wagemakers writes:
The latest gcc sersion 2.96 ( which is the default compiler on Red Hat 7 )
has
a few bugs and isn't able to compile the Linux kernel. This version of gcc
is
only a pre-release therefor
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 04:14:04PM +0100, staf wagemakers wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:29:20PM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
| :: staf wagemakers writes:
|
[snip]
| I'd call our version of gcc (2.95.3) a prerelease, but not Red
| Hat's 2.96.
|
| The gcc people had to publicaly
Hi all
I am really confused over the different compilers wich seems to be
together.
Does EGCS exist today? or is it included in GCC. Many software recomments
to be compiled with egcs (???). I have GCC 2.95.2 installed on my machine
wich seems to be the latest version of GCC. The kernel doc
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
Hi all
I am really confused over the different compilers wich seems to be
together.
Does EGCS exist today? or is it included in GCC. Many software recomments
to be compiled with egcs (???). I have GCC 2.95.2 installed on my machine
If I'm
As I understand the history, the egcs people had a disagreement with
the gcc people so they split off and continued to develop gcc on their
own. Later, egcs was in a better state than gcc so the gcc people got
together with the egcs people and merged the two compilers to make a
best of both
Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
Does EGCS exist today? or is it included in GCC. Many software recomments
to be compiled with egcs (???).
Like others have said already, gcc and egcs merged some time back.
I have GCC 2.95.2 installed on my machine wich seems to be the latest
version of GCC
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:00:14PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
I am really confused over the different compilers wich seems to be
together.
Does EGCS exist today? or is it included in GCC. Many software recomments
to be compiled with egcs (???). I have GCC 2.95.2 installed on my
On Saturday 06 January 2001 22:19, Mike wrote:
Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
Does EGCS exist today? or is it included in GCC. Many software
recomments
to be compiled with egcs (???).
Like others have said already, gcc and egcs merged some time back.
I have GCC 2.95.2 installed on my machine
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:49:11PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
Thanks a lot for your help. I also compile all my stuff on GCC 2.95.2
without having any troubbles at anytime. I'm just wundering what the GREAT
difference between the releases could be. I mean the language for example
C
:: staf wagemakers writes:
The latest gcc sersion 2.96 ( which is the default compiler on Red Hat 7 )
has
a few bugs and isn't able to compile the Linux kernel. This version of gcc is
only a pre-release therefor I wouldn't use this version at all...
There was some flame war in
Hello,
I'm looking for egcs (egcc/eg++) in potato.
Were the cygnus compilers being removed from the
distribution?
Regards
--
Marc Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 04:28:00PM +0200, Marc Meier wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for egcs (egcc/eg++) in potato.
Were the cygnus compilers being removed from the
distribution?
The mainline gcc 2.95.2 is egcs. Egcs merged back with the FSF, and is now
producing (for quite some time
Hi All,
Does anybody know if -march=pentium in egcc implies automatically the
-malign-double?
--
TIA
Wojciech M. Zabolotny
http://www.ise.pw.edu.pl/~wzab -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freedos.org Free DOS for free people!
Hi,
I'd like to know which debian package is the egcs?
Thanks
---
tcp
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 09:10:35PM -0600, Timothy C. Phan wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know which debian package is the egcs?
Thanks
You want the old egcs? gcc-2.95 == egcs.
--
++
| Eric G. Milleregm2@jps.net
included from ../../gcc/c-lex.c:25:
../../gcc/rtl.h:1074: genrtl.h: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [c-lex.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/egcs-build/egcs-1.1.2/builddir/gcc'
make[2]: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/egcs-build/egcs-1.1.2/builddir
I'm running Debian (slink) on an Alpha, and attempting to recompile the egcs
compiler suite from the Debian source package;
egcs_1.1.2-0slink2.diff.gz
egcs_1.1.2-0slink2.dsc
egcs_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz
after unpacking the source, I ran
# dpkg-source -us -uc -b
in the source directory
Yes, you can either comment out a few lines in debian/rules (anything
referring to with_check) or install expect and dejagnu.
C
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Shaun Cloherty wrote:
I'm running Debian (slink) on an Alpha, and attempting to recompile the egcs
compiler suite from the Debian source
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 01:20:28PM +1100, Shaun Cloherty wrote
I'm running Debian (slink) on an Alpha, and attempting to recompile the egcs
compiler suite from the Debian source package;
egcs_1.1.2-0slink2.diff.gz
egcs_1.1.2-0slink2.dsc
egcs_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz
after unpacking the source
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding the apt-get package name for
egcs. Are there any packages that have that?
--
Bart Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:4982727
B Grafyx http://www.bgrafyx.com
Join AllAdvantage.com and get paid to surf the Web!
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=ARD582
well this may not answer your question the newest GCC releases are the
work of the egcs group and i believe the egcs group totally took over gcc
development, so you may try looking for something along the lines of gcc
2.9 gcc2.95 2.95.1(?) etc ..
nate
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Bart Szyszka wrote
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 07:12:57PM -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding the apt-get package name for
egcs. Are there any packages that have that?
In slink, the gcc package is egcs 1.1.2. Currently egcs has been
maintained as the mainline gcc, so gcc 2.95.2 in potato
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding the apt-get package name for egcs. Are
there any packages that have that?
Try installing the package egcc.
--
--
Phil Brutsche
Can I install the current slink version of egcs (1.1.1) alongside the
1.0.x version?
Thanks
--
-bob
An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass
is half-empty. An engineer says the glass is twice as big as it
needs
Hi All,
I'm using egcs for my software project. This is the output for g++ -v.
gcc version egcs-2.91.60 Debian 2.1 (egcs-1.1.1 release)
I've run across an internal compiler error, and hesitate to report it as a
bug unless it's also a bug in the latest version of egcs. So, what I want
to know
Hi Robert,
On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 07:40:09PM -0600, Robert Kerr wrote:
Hi All,
I'm using egcs for my software project. This is the output for g++ -v.
gcc version egcs-2.91.60 Debian 2.1 (egcs-1.1.1 release)
are you aware that the egcs team is now the official maintainer of gcc?
Egcs and gcc
Hi all,
can g++ (the egcs version) and g++272 coexist successfully?
I'm using a slink system, and think that I need to back up the g++272
compiler for a legacy app, but don't want to mess anything up with my
current happy egcs g++ compiler.
--
-bob
An optimist says the glass is half full
On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 08:01:37 -0600, Robert Kerr wrote:
can g++ (the egcs version) and g++272 coexist successfully?
No; the library packages they need conflict. g++272 was a crude hack to
allow package maintainers a backdoor for compiling old code.
I'm using a slink system, and think
from gcc -v
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 Debian GNU/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
toupper and tolower throw warnings (or not) depending on optimization.
Compiling the following test program with:
cc -Wall -ansi -pedantic -c junk.c
will not give any errors. However, adding -O causes ansi
that there are illegal constructs in 2.0 that
GCC likes but EGCS hates, and that these problems were fixed in the 2.1
development
tree some time ago. The whole GCC/EGCS thing is mostly political, IMHO, as
many agree that EGCS is the superior compiler. There was a big thread on -devel
discussing whether glibc2.1
On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 12:18:50AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
Ok, whose big idea was it not to provide a real gcc in potato? Maybe it
is me but I couldn't find one. I did an auto-upgrade and broke my ability
to compile 2.0.27-pre kernels cleanly.
I don't mind being offered egcs but I
On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 00:18:50 -0800, George Bonser wrote:
Ok, whose big idea was it not to provide a real gcc in potato?
Fully switching to EGCS has been planned for potato for quite some time now.
Maybe it is me but I couldn't find one.
There isn't one, yet. We're working on building one
(though I
did a grep in 2.2.5-ac3 for initio, and didn't find an update (relative to
2.2.5)).
2.2.5 won't build with the egcs in potato either.
For a particular configuration perhaps. I've had no problems compiling
2.2.X(-acY) kernels for my systems.
2.2.5 is the latest kernel but 2.0.37 has
something with screen
// SEGFAULT!
}
I kicked myself in the head when I found the problem:
duplicate declaration of screen at different scopes.
Is there any way to get EGCS to give me a warning about
this?
--
Stephen Pitts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
webmaster - http://www.mschess.org
Herbert Rosmanith wrote:
subject says it. I built 2.0.36 with egcs-1.1, everything works quite
normal except the X-Server dumps core, regardsless if I start SVGA, VGA16
or Mach64 (in my case) server.
I don't have the nerve to compile the XServer myself with -g ;-)
so, just to let you
Does anybody know the difference and/or relationship between
egcs 1.1.1 as the latest version (see egcs' home page:
egcs-www.cygnus.com)
and
egcs 2.90.29 in Debian distribution?
TIA
Jian
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 17:33:42 -0800, Jian Gong wrote:
Does anybody know the difference and/or relationship between
egcs 1.1.1 as the latest version
That version is available in frozen and unstable; it will be part of
Debian 2.1.
and egcs 2.90.29 in Debian distribution?
That's
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 14:50:43 -0800, G. Crimp wrote:
The egcs versions of gcc and g++ are not both yet ready for prime
time. I may get corrected on this,
Indeed.
but I think it is gcc that still has some bugs,
Wrong. To quote /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian:
:- FSF gcc 2.7.2.x provides
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 02:49:17PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
another gcc.
Do the 2.2 kernels compile with egcs?
As of somewhere in the 2.1 series Linux
.
Do the 2.2 kernels compile with egcs?
As of somewhere in the 2.1 series Linux kernels should work with egcs.
I've been using an egcc compiled 2.1 kernel for a few months now and
the 2.2.0-pre serie works with no problem when compiled with egcc.
Chris
--
Looking for a cutting edge
is focused on
egcs - apparently the gcc people will take code from egcs to create the
next gcc releases or something.
What egcs means?
gcc is for GNU C Compiler, egcc is for GNU (egcs) C Compiler. But, does
the g from egcs come from GNU ?
If both gcc and egcs are developed by GNU, why
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:16:32 +0100, Conrado Badenas wrote:
What egcs means?
It used to mean Experimental GCC Compiler Suite, though AFAIK it's not
expanded anywhere on the EGCS website (http://egcs.cygnus.com) anymore.
If both gcc and egcs are developed by GNU, why they are missynchronized
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, fantumn (Steven Baker) wrote:
First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
It is mostly a matter of version
Somewhere in /usr/doc/gcc (sorry, don't remember exactly where) I
found a recommendation about
answer from
someone else, but I will give it a try. Apparently, gcc and g++ development
became fragmented as developers split into a number of camps. GNU gcc and
g++ development (Deb gcc and g++ were the GNU versions) has halted, or at
least slowed to a trickle. egcs is a movement to bring back
Okay, I don't want to start a holy war or anything here, but I have some
questions about egcs and gcc.
First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
(Note: when I say gcc, I mean gcc _and_ g++)
Compatibility: First, can egcs compile everything that gcc can? IE: kernel
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, fantumn (Steven Baker) wrote:
Okay, I don't want to start a holy war or anything here, but I have some
questions about egcs and gcc.
First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
It is mostly a matter of version
gcc 2.7.* has been used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
another gcc.
Do the 2.2 kernels compile with egcs?
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm
binWATVpeuW5K.bin
Description: Binary data
Well, here's the situation. I'm trying to port a package to Linux which,
unfortunately, depends a great deal on generic.h and stuff that only comes
in the libg++ package. But, I'm also using the egcs compiler, which
doesn't include libg++. From the egcs home page I've found some
information
library - old runtime
ii libg++2.8.2 2.91.60-1 The GNU C++ extension library - runtime vers
ii libg++272 2.7.2.8-0.1The GNU C++ libraries (libc6 version).
ii libstdc++2.82.90.29-2 The GNU stdc++ library (old egcs version)
ii libstdc++2.92.91.60-1 The GNU stdc
Martin Waller wrote:
Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian .
I did but was still confused :(
It didn't say *why* we have an apparent fork in compiler development.
Since the gcc compiler is at the core of Linux (behind only the kernel
itself in importance), having a semi-permanent
.
The EGCS project has brought nearly all of gcc's lost children together
again. That's progress.
Second, de facto there is no fork. The FSF gcc development is dead (or at
least smelling /very/ funny), though the FSF doesn't admit it yet. EGCS is
alive and well.
[As a small example, FSF gcc 2.8.1's
Subject: Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Waller)
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:30:50 +1100 (EST)
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
From: Jiri Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Over the weekend, I downlaoded V 1.20 onto /usr/local/.
Did the same last
it was complaining about
:-)
Getting rid of it fixed the problem. I hope it didn't break anything (but
FREEdraft compiled and ran okay, so I guess not).
Being naive enough to try anything, and having heard of all sorts of
problems with egcs and g++, I decided to scrap g++2.8 and put g++2.7.2 on.
(I had egcs
the make error message:
In vbglcnv.h:51:Invalid storage class specifiers decalared in friend
functions
I didn't have a clue what this meant even after viewing the two friend
functions alluded to.
Being naive enough to try anything, and having heard of all sorts of
problems with egcs and g++, I
heard of all sorts of
problems with egcs and g++, I decided to scrap g++2.8 and put g++2.7.2 on.
(I had egcs 2.90.29, dated 19980515).
g++2.7.2 is intended only for compiling code that cannot be compiled with
EGCS gcc. It's not supposed to be easy to install or use.
So, please help me - why
Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian .
I did but was still confused :(
Being naive enough to try anything, and having heard of all sorts of
problems with egcs and g++, I decided to scrap g++2.8 and put
g++2.7.2 on.
(I had egcs 2.90.29, dated 19980515).
g++2.7.2 is intended only for compiling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone grabbed egcs 1.1.1 and compiled it? Does it do so cleanly?
Chris
- Visit Me At http://www.frostnet.advicom.net/chris/ -
--
Public
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 21:20:51 -0600, Chris Frost wrote:
Has anyone grabbed egcs 1.1.1 and compiled it?
The last egcs 1.1.1 prerelease (which is identical to the release) is
available in both frozen and unstable.
Ray
--
PATRIOTISM A great British writer once said that if he had to choose
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Alfonso Pastor wrote:
La verdad es que estoy hecho un lio entre gcc, g++ (egcs), g++272, y todas
las lib que arrastran. ¿Podria alguien aclararme que es cada cosa?.
Una ultima cuestion: si egcs no es un compilador estable, como parecen mostrar
esos errores, ¿porque se
Hola, he estado compilando con el egcs varias k-aplicaciones (no las del
KDE, sino aplicaciones que de momento no estan en la distribucion oficial
del mismo) y varias de ellas me dan problemas de compilacion con errores
internos del egcs, ¿no existe un compilador con las que pueda compilarlas
sin
Please can someone explain to me the difference between EGCS compilers
and non-EGCS ones? The little info given in dselect is not very
informative.
Thanks,
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey Email
On Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 05:07:51PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Please can someone explain to me the difference between EGCS compilers and
non-EGCS ones?
See the README included in the various egcs packages (e.g. g++), and
question 1 of the egcs FAQ at http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html .
HTH,
Ray
Hi,
Please can someone explain to me the difference between EGCS compilers
and non-EGCS ones? The little info given in dselect is not very
informative.
EGCS is the Experimental GNU Compiler System. It is on a slightly faster
development track then GCC 2.8.1, for example. The EGCS project
Hi all,
Any idea when EGCS 1.1 will be packaged? I'd really like to have it.
Otherwise, I'll just stick it in /usr/local myself. :)
-Ossama
__
Ossama Othman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 11:55:49AM -0400, Ossama Othman wrote:
Any idea when EGCS 1.1 will be packaged?
It is packaged. Currently it's available only on my harddisk. I'll upload it
tomorrow morning CET.
HTH,
Ray
--
ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old.
I'd
On Sat, Aug 08, 1998 at 05:58:27PM -0230, Greg Starkes wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
The problem is that gcc is an ANSI C compiler, and you wanted to compile
a C++ program. I think that If you have just changed gcc to g++ ( the
GNU C++ compiler) everything would have
Last night I was trying to compile to programs that were written in c++
(wmcdplay wmmixer). The installation instructions said to run xmkmf,
then make. When I did this xmkmf set CXX=c++ and CC=gcc. At this point I
should mention that I did NOT have egcs installed on my system, so c++ did
egcs installed on my system, so c++ did
not exist, and when I changed the Makefile so that CXX=gcc, gcc
complained. (I can't remember the exact error, and I am away from my
machine.)
The problem is that gcc is an ANSI C compiler, and you wanted to compile a
C++ program. I think that If you have
. At this point I
should mention that I did NOT have egcs installed on my system, so c++ did
not exist, and when I changed the Makefile so that CXX=gcc, gcc
complained. (I can't remember the exact error, and I am away from my
machine.)
The problem is that gcc is an ANSI C compiler, and you wanted
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this are old libg++ headers. libg++ is obsolete, don't use it if
you can help it.
Thanks for the clarification. I was compiling a package whose includes
included g the header files in question, so I wasn't free to pick and
choose.
I guess
There seem to be (at least) four files not installed in the ../include/g++
directory that is produced by egcs that _are_ part of the GNU g++ includes,
namely
Regex.h
Pix.h
String.h
SLList.h
Why is this, and can anyone suggest the most elegant method for making these
absent includes available
On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, Bob Bernstein wrote:
There seem to be (at least) four files not installed in the ../include/g++
directory that is produced by egcs that _are_ part of the GNU g++ includes,
namely
Regex.h
Pix.h
String.h
SLList.h
Why is this, and can anyone suggest the most elegant
On Wed, Jul 01, 1998 at 10:14:23PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, Bob Bernstein wrote:
There seem to be (at least) four files not installed in the
../include/g++ directory that is produced by egcs that _are_ part of the
GNU g++ includes, namely
Regex.h Pix.h String.h
I have been using the old G++ for some time and recently found that
upgrading has caused the genclass script, String library, and other
GNU stuff to disappear. Is there a package I am missing? Do I need
to switch over to the STL?
I am using the genclass types in a project for school -- The
On Mon, Apr 06, 1998 at 03:45:14AM -0300, Kevin M.Bealer wrote:
I have been using the old G++ for some time and recently found that
upgrading has caused the genclass script, String library, and other GNU
stuff to disappear. Is there a package I am missing? Do I need to switch
over to the STL?
Hi,
this small program doesn't seem to work properly with egcs. I was wondering if
this is a kwown bug/problem or if I am just doing something *very* stupid:
#include iostream.h
#include iomanip.h
main()
{
cout.fill(' ');
for(float i=0;i10;i+=0.1)
cout setprecision(2) setw(5) i endl
92 matches
Mail list logo
