It's bug 814081 : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814081 .
Le lun. 15 févr. 2016 15:29, Sven Arvidsson a écrit :
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 10:57 +0100, Me wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply, I reported it to the Debian GNOME maintainer.
> >
>
> Do you have a bug report
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 10:57 +0100, Me wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, I reported it to the Debian GNOME maintainer.
>
Do you have a bug report number?
I'm interested on following up on this as I experience the same thing
(sometimes).
There have been open bugs about this both upstream and in
Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 03:20:22PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sun, 07 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
Hello,
In GNOME Shell, when I click on the "Eject" option in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:49:43AM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[...]
> In 3 years of use, I've experienced no problems. Why does no one
> believe me?
I *do* believe what you state above. I just *strongly* recommend
against the practice you
On Friday 12 February 2016 02:39:29 David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 11 Feb 2016 at 22:57:02 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 February 2016 22:27:30 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:13:27AM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > > A point of order here: All this
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 11 Feb 2016 at 10:49:43 (-0800), Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue 09 Feb 2016 at 09:00:50 (-0800), Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Le lundi 08
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:13:27AM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > A point of order here: All this applies to Wheezy; I don't know now
> > that Debian has adopted systemd and udev has it as a dependency that
> > all this will work the same.
>
> Oh,
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 février 2016 à 11:57 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > All I can say is it works, caveats you mentioned aside. No
> > problems in 3 years of use.
>
> Your system probably doesn't use caching then, unlike the default
> Debian+GNOME install. Since
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:49:43AM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > In 3 years of use, I've experienced no problems. Why does no one
> > believe me?
>
> I *do* believe what you
On 13/02/16 04:22, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> You know, I've never even seen a key that doesn't have an LED on it.
> Of course, I only buy the big "thumb" drives and not the teenie, tiny
> ones designed to be inconspicuous.
I have here, and have seen, several such drives in various sizes.
--
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 13/02/16 04:22, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > You know, I've never even seen a key that doesn't have an LED on it.
> > Of course, I only buy the big "thumb" drives and not the teenie,
> > tiny ones designed to be inconspicuous.
>
> I have here, and
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> Le mardi 09 février 2016 à 09:00 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > Yes, I know about caching, but on my system read/writes to removable
> > devices are almost instantaneous.
>
> Maybe it's just luck ? As I said, I frequently get a message from
> GNOME saying
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 09 Feb 2016 at 09:00:50 (-0800), Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> >
> > > Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 13:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > > > Perhaps in days gone by: my OS prior to Wheezy -- Fedora 12 --
> > > >
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 09 Feb 2016 at 09:00:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> >
> > > Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 13:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > > > Perhaps in days gone by: my OS prior to Wheezy -- Fedora 12 --
> > > > was like
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 08/02/16 09:20, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > You shouldn't have to "eject" it all. Just plug it in and when
> > done, pull it out. The system should mount and unmount it
> > automatically. We're not talking Windows here.
>
> We're not talking DOS
On Thursday 11 February 2016 22:27:30 Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:13:27AM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > A point of order here: All this applies to Wheezy; I don't know now
> > that Debian has adopted systemd and udev has it as a dependency that
> > all this will work
On Thu 11 Feb 2016 at 10:49:43 (-0800), Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Tue 09 Feb 2016 at 09:00:50 (-0800), Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> > >
> > > > Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 13:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > > >
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:13:27AM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> A point of order here: All this applies to Wheezy; I don't know now
> that Debian has adopted systemd and udev has it as a dependency that
> all this will work the same.
Oh, so Wheezy will work without udev?
--
"If you're not
Le jeudi 11 février 2016 à 11:57 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> All I can say is it works, caveats you mentioned aside. No
> problems in 3 years of use.
Your system probably doesn't use caching then, unlike the default
Debian+GNOME install. Since you are careful not to unplug your drives
when
On Thu 11 Feb 2016 at 22:57:02 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2016 22:27:30 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:13:27AM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > A point of order here: All this applies to Wheezy; I don't know now
> > > that Debian has adopted
Le mardi 09 février 2016 à 09:00 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> Yes, I know about caching, but on my system read/writes to removable
> devices are almost instantaneous.
Maybe it's just luck ? As I said, I frequently get a message from GNOME
saying the writes are not finished, and that although
On Tue 09 Feb 2016 at 09:00:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 13:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > > Perhaps in days gone by: my OS prior to Wheezy -- Fedora 12 --
> > > was like that. Anything USB had to be mounted/unmounted
Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 13:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> Perhaps in days gone by: my OS prior to Wheezy -- Fedora 12 --
> was like that. Anything USB had to be mounted/unmounted manually.
> What a pain. And if you unplugged without unmounting . . . Yes, things
> could break. But with
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 13:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > Perhaps in days gone by: my OS prior to Wheezy -- Fedora 12 --
> > was like that. Anything USB had to be mounted/unmounted manually.
> > What a pain. And if you unplugged without unmounting . .
On 08/02/16 09:20, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> You shouldn't have to "eject" it all. Just plug it in and when done,
> pull it out. The system should mount and unmount it automatically. We're
> not talking Windows here.
We're not talking DOS either.
Windows 98 might've written data synchronously to
On Tue 09 Feb 2016 at 09:00:50 (-0800), Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 13:50 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > > Perhaps in days gone by: my OS prior to Wheezy -- Fedora 12 --
> > > was like that. Anything USB had to be mounted/unmounted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 03:20:22PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > In GNOME Shell, when I click on the "Eject" option in the notification
> > bar to unmount my USB key, it unmounts correctly and
Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 08:35 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> Otherwise you either lose the last writes to the device (if you're
> lucky and/or have a civilised file system on your stick, like ext3/ext4),
> or the whole file system is thrashed (more likely when you have an
> uncivilised
Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 10:06 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> It looks more a GNOME thing to me -- but I guess the Debian GNOME
> maintainers are able to cope with it (plus your report would be
> targetting the specific version you're using). So Debian seems
> to me the first choice here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Me wrote:
> Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 08:35 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> > Otherwise you either lose the last writes to the device (if you're
> > lucky and/or have a civilised file system on your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:50:59PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > This seems like *very* bad advice. The system keeps a cache[1] of the
> > data in the USB and flushes this cache only from time
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 03:20:22PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 07 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In GNOME Shell, when I click on the "Eject" option in the
> > >
Hello,
In GNOME Shell, when I click on the "Eject" option in the notification
bar to unmount my USB key, it unmounts correctly and then immediately
mounts again, as if I just plugged it.
It happens only with the Kingston DataTraveler I own. I've tried on
several desktops, and it seems to happen
On Sun, 07 Feb 2016, Me wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In GNOME Shell, when I click on the "Eject" option in the notification
> bar to unmount my USB key, it unmounts correctly and then immediately
> mounts again, as if I just plugged it.
>
> It happens only with the Kingston DataTraveler I own. I've
Le dimanche 07 février 2016 à 15:20 -0800, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> You shouldn't have to "eject" it all. Just plug it in and when done,
> pull it out. The system should mount and unmount it automatically. We're
> not talking Windows here.
What if some program, like my backup software, began
35 matches
Mail list logo