Re: Installer - Was: [OT, FLAME] Linux Sucks

2003-03-25 Thread Shri Shrikumar
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:06, Alfredo J. Cole wrote: El Lun 24 Mar 2003 12:03, nate escribió: (...) hopefully this time around there's enough time for them to get it working, though I don't know if we'll see an official X11-based installer for the next revision, I hope that they have the

Re: Installer - Was: [OT, FLAME] Linux Sucks

2003-03-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:29:43PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:06, Alfredo J. Cole wrote: El Lun 24 Mar 2003 12:03, nate escribi?: (...) hopefully this time around there's enough time for them to get it working, though I don't know if we'll see an official

Re: Installer - Was: [OT, FLAME] Linux Sucks

2003-03-25 Thread Klaus Imgrund
Does anybody if the installer that is used for the 'testing netinstall' images is a sign of things to come.If so I would like to know where I can go and whine about it. Klaus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Installer - Was: [OT, FLAME] Linux Sucks

2003-03-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:51:18AM +, Klaus Imgrund wrote: Does anybody if the installer that is used for the 'testing netinstall' images is a sign of things to come.If so I would like to know where I can go and whine about it. I'm not sure about how the testing netinstall relates to

Re: Installer - Was: [OT, FLAME] Linux Sucks

2003-03-24 Thread Alfredo J. Cole
El Lun 24 Mar 2003 12:03, nate escribió: (...) hopefully this time around there's enough time for them to get it working, though I don't know if we'll see an official X11-based installer for the next revision, I hope that they have the backend and a ncurses-style installer done for the next