On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:35:56 -0500
Keith Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
defaults? The installer is very nice.
Libranet is a commercial distro (and a very
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:24:46PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:35:56 -0500
Keith Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
defaults? The
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:24:46PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
Libranet is a commercial distro (and a very good one too - it's what I
use). Anyway, the installer and configuration utilities are the property
of the owners, so Debian can't simply adopt it without permission. The
While I like a lot about Libranet, my plan was to use it as a short
cut installer for Debian. I hope that doesn't violate the spirit of
the free (older) Libranet version. The price of Libranet seems a
little high to me, considering that they rely on Debian to provide
security fixes, but
Hi,
Hi,
...my question is if I do an apt-get
upgrade, will I officially be converted to sarge, or is there
more to it
than that?
I believe you might have to apt-get dist-upgrade when doing a change so
fundamental.
On 6 Mar 03 22:35:56 GMT, Keith Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
defaults? The installer is very nice.
Debian supports 11(?) architectures. How many does
version of
Libranet (2.0), basically for the installer, with plans to convert to
sarge. The Libranet install went great, set up my network, sound, X,
etc. reasonably well.
Next, I changed my /etc/apt/sources.list to point to sarge instead of
woody. Then, I did an apt-get install synaptic
7 matches
Mail list logo
