Hi all Debian users,
I posted a message to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper that I
have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few related questions
about Linux + SMP. If there is a Linux kernel guru in this list that can
answer my questions I will thanks a lot
Read the SMP-HOWTO
Sean
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
Hi all Debian users,
I posted a message to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper that I
have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few related questions
about Linux + SMP. If there is a Linux
to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper that
I
have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few related
questions
about Linux + SMP. If there is a Linux kernel guru in this list that can
answer my questions I will thanks a lot.
Paulo Henrique
- Forwarded
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
I posted a message to linux-kernel to help me in a small paper
that I have to do for tomorrow and dont see an answer. It is a few
related questions about Linux + SMP. If there is a Linux kernel guru
in this list that can
On Tue, 3 Nov 1998, George Bonser wrote:
[ snip ]
: You have three choices:
:
: 1. Live with it
: 2. Compile a non-SMB kernel
: 3. move to a 2.1.x kernel.
FWIW, we have a server that gets the crap kicked out of it
(debian.midco.net) which is running 2.1.125 - it's an IBM Server 325
with
Hi,
I have had problems before but now I am running Debian Linux on an SMP
machine and it crashes once a week or so. It locks real hard and all I can
do is press the on/off switch to get started.
I suspected the memory but all the tests I know of do not seem to
indicate the problem is with the
I'm wonder, and perhap some you linux buffs could help.
HOw great is the performance gain from SMP? I have been debating this
with a friend. I know linux has muli-threaded capability, but like the
kernal isn't explicitly multithreaded(or is it), yeah you can compile it
for multiple processors,
HOw great is the performance gain from SMP? I have been debating this
with a friend. I know linux has muli-threaded capability, but like the
I'm not a linux guru, in fact, I'd label myself as a linux struggler. That
aside, I can tell you that the performance gain of multiple processors
HOw great is the performance gain from SMP? I have been debating this
with a friend. I know linux has muli-threaded capability, but like the
I'm not a linux guru, in fact, I'd label myself as a linux struggler. That
aside, I can tell you that the performance gain of multiple processors
Philip Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm wonder, and perhap some you linux buffs could help. HOw great is the
performance gain from SMP?
I run on a two processor pentium pro machine all of the time - for doing
development, make -j [ something 1 ] gives about double compilation
speed, as
Is Linux with SMP more stable in 2.1 than in 2.0 ?
I have random lockups under heavy load. I've tried the shed.c patches
from Leonard Zubkoff on the linux-smp mailing-list without any
success...
If yes, which 2.1 version is ok ?
Does debian (hamm) works ok with 2.1 ?
Thanks for any info
Ricardo Kleemann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi guys...
:
: I'm wondering if attempting to use Linux-SMP is any good. Afterall, for
: real efficiency, don't the programs/daemons/utilities have to be designed
: in such a way that they'll make use of SMP capabilities?
The operating systems
Hi guys...
I'm wondering if attempting to use Linux-SMP is any good. Afterall, for
real efficiency, don't the programs/daemons/utilities have to be designed
in such a way that they'll make use of SMP capabilities?
For example, if I have sendmail, pop3d, httpd daemons running, on a dual
13 matches
Mail list logo
