On Mon 28 Sep 2020 at 07:56:22 -0700, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28 2020 at 09:46:09 AM, "Stephen P. Molnar"
> wrote:
> > On 09/27/2020 01:35 PM, Brian wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Npthing to do with your issue, but what is your Brother model?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Happy to let you know:
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 28 2020 at 09:46:09 AM, "Stephen P. Molnar"
wrote:
> On 09/27/2020 01:35 PM, Brian wrote:
>> Npthing to do with your issue, but what is your Brother model?
>>
>
>
> Happy to let you know:
>
> DCP-L2550DW
>
You may not need any of the drivers from Brother for this device. The
On 09/27/2020 01:35 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 13:09:02 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 09/27/2020 12:44 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 13:09:02 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2020 12:44 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to
> > > /opt/brother/scanner. However,
On 09/27/2020 12:44 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to
/opt/brother/scanner. However, sudo apt purge brscan4 I got:
comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother/tmp$ sudo apt purge
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to
> /opt/brother/scanner. However, sudo apt purge brscan4 I got:
>
> comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother/tmp$ sudo apt purge brscan4
> [sudo] password for comp:
>
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2020 09:21 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 07:32:20 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found
> > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 19:
> > >
On 09/27/2020 09:21 AM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 07:32:20 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
/opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found
/var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 19:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst:
/opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh: not found
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 07:32:20 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 19:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst:
> /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh: not found
You have checked whether tose files
On 09/26/2020 06:06 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-09-26 at 05:18, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
This morning this resulted in the error
The following partially installed packages will be
On 09/26/2020 06:06 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-09-26 at 05:18, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
This morning this resulted in the error
The following partially installed packages will be
On 2020-09-26 at 05:18, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>>> This morning this resulted in the error
>>>
>>> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
I somehow managed to miss
On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of
a problem.
Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command
sudo apr update && sudo apt upgrade.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:13:28AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:08:09AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> > Here is my edited sources.list:
>
> Your *what*?!
[...]
Greg, your knowledge is invaluable here. And while I do agree
with the content of your post, the form
On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of
> a problem.
>
> Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command
> sudo apr update && sudo apt upgrade.
^
I'm presuming this is a pure
source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
> After unpacking 0 B will be used.
> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
> E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download
> E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, pleas
On Vi, 25 sep 20, 09:32:27, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >
> Sorry, nonexistent proof reading.
>
> Here are the requested files
>
> sources.list:
>
> # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.1.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1
> 20190908-01:09]/ buster contrib main
>
> # deb cdrom:[Debian
.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
> After unpacking 0 B will be used.
> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
> E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download
> E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude
> u
On 09/25/2020 09:13 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:08:09AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Here is my edited sources.list:
Your *what*?!
What do you mean, "edited"? Do you mean, "here is a file that is not
my sources.list, but some part of it may be similar, and you
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:08:09AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Here is my edited sources.list:
Your *what*?!
What do you mean, "edited"? Do you mean, "here is a file that is not
my sources.list, but some part of it may be similar, and you get to guess
what the real one contains"? How is
king 0 B will be used.
E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download
E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude update'
(or equivalent); otherwise some packages or versions are not a
'
> After unpacking 0 B will be used.
> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
> E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download
> E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude update'
> (or equivalent); ot
'0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download
E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude
update' (or equivalent); otherwise some packages or versions are not
available from the current repository sources
I reinstalled the
-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
>
> All installed packages should be checked, not all available from stable.
Or just with aptitude:
aptitude -F "%p" search '!~Atesting!~Aunstable~i'
At least on my system it produces the same list of packages.
>
>> All three archives have to be present with the names used above in your
>> sources.list file (that is, e.g., "unstable" and not "sid").
Regards,
jvp.
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 11/04/16 14:39:
> Maybe, this "one-liner" does what you want?
>
> aptitude -F "%p" search ~Astable| sort | \
> (aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
> comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
>
This needs a correction, if I'm not
Maybe, this "one-liner" does what you want?
aptitude -F "%p" search ~Astable| sort | \
(aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
All three archives have to be present with the names used above in your
sources.list file (that
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:16:03PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> Not sure if you read the entire thread, I ended up writing a script to
>> do this now. So, if you want to see packages that are currently
>> installed
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:58:32AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>
> aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>
> meet your needs?
>
> >>>
> >>>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
> >>>output. What is it supposed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 14:46:05 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >>>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
> >>>Raspbian box?
> >>
> >>cat sources.list
> >>deb
Le 03-11-2016, à 14:46:05 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
>Raspbian box?
cat sources.list
deb http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ jessie main contrib
non-free rpi
and
cat sources.list.d/raspi.list deb
On Thu 03 Nov 2016 at 14:46:05 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> >
> > >On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > >>Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100,
>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
>Raspbian box?
cat sources.list
deb http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ jessie main contrib
non-free rpi
and
cat sources.list.d/raspi.list deb
http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian/ jessie main ui
Hm. So my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> >>Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> >>
>
Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
>and children?
deb
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:16:03PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Not sure if you read the entire thread, I ended up writing a script to
> do this now. So, if you want to see packages that are currently
> installed on your system but not part of jessie, you can do the
> following.
Thanks, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
> >and children?
>
> deb
Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
and children?
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:58:32AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>
> aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>
> meet your needs?
>
> >>>
> >>>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not
Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>>aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>>
>>meet your needs?
>>
>
>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
>output. What is it supposed to do?
I'm with Kamaraju on this, zero output. I also tried quoting the search
string
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:36:59AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 02-11-2016, à 22:25:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>
> >>does
> >>
> >>aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
> >>
> >>meet your needs?
> >>
> >
> >No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
> >output. What is it
Le 02-11-2016, à 22:25:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
does
aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
meet your needs?
No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
output. What is it supposed to do?
I get this as an output (first few in French, sorry):
i ant -
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:45 AM, steve <dl...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
> Hi Kamaraju,
>
> Le 23-10-2016, à 20:48:46 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>
>> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
>> currently part of the stable distribution but no
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:48:46PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
>> currently part of the stable distribution but not present
Hi Kamaraju,
Le 23-10-2016, à 20:48:46 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
testing or sid?
does
aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
meet your needs?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:48:46PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
This is a good question (sorry I don't have the answer here). I
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:48 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi
<raju.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
>
> For example, libkasten2ok
On Oct 23, 2016, at 5:48 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailingli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
try something like this
aptitude -F
to remove them.
A small change to my first script should list all packages that are
neither in stretch nor sid, not 100% exactly what you are looking for,
but maybe good enough (?):
#!/usr/bin/python
from commands import getoutput
allpkgs = getoutput('apt-show-versions -b').splitlines()
str
' for all packages that are
installed on your system but not installable. If you pipe the output
through sed like that (checking for just 'available' should suffice),
the result is a list of installed packages which are not available in
the archive, using the current state of sources.list
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:36:02 -0400
>
> Hmmm...
> Here I get:
> $ apt-show-versions -b | grep "\"
> python3.4:amd64/jessie
> python3.4-minimal:amd64/jessie
>
> What does apt-cache say about python3.4? Here I
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:36:02 -0400
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Thanks for the script. But I do not think it does what I want. For
> example, currently there is a python3.4 package installed on my
> system.
>
> % dpkg -l python3.4 | cut -c 1-72
>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Michael Lange wrote:
>
> Nice. After these suggestions I hastily put together a small python
> script, that might come close to what Raju wants:
>
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> from commands import getoutput
>
> allpkgs =
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:24:00 -0400
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> Oooohhh, shiny new toy that I just found because of you. This came via
> "man apt-show-versions":
>
> To upgrade all packages in testing:
>
>apt-get install `apt-show-versions -u -b | grep
On 10/23/16, kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
>
> For example, ibkasten2okteta1controllers1abi1
How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
testing or sid?
For example, ibkasten2okteta1controllers1abi1 libkasten2okteta1gui1
are currently part of stable, but not present in either testing or
sid
On Mi, 26 mar 14, 15:07:58, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
See also:
popcon-largest-unused(8)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users
Hi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:07:58PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
Nice. But
dpigs -20
(from the debian-goodies package) is still shorter :-)
--
Karl E. Jorgensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
2014-03-26 9:26 GMT+01:00 Karl E. Jorgensen k...@jorgensen.org.uk:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:07:58PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
Nice. But
dpigs -20
dpig -n 20
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
--
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing. --- Malcolm X
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thank you Tom, this works as expected.
I was expecting ~A to match far less, but on second thought there will
be enough cases where the broader scope is essential.
All the best,
Peter
On 17.02.2014 22:04, Tom H wrote:
What is the correct filter to:
- list all installed packages coming from
is as follows:
Produce a list of installed packages whose presently installed version
is from the testing archive.
The /etc/sources.list currently holds references to squeeze/updates
(debian-security), main squeeze stable release, squeeze-updates,
squeeze-backports; and to the testing release. Through
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Peter Schott peter.sch...@ivao.de wrote:
What is the correct filter to:
- list all installed packages coming from testing release;
- while *not* listing installed packages from other releases (e.g. stable)
for which an alternative version from testing
On Mi, 24 apr 13, 08:43:07, green wrote:
Following are the commands I use for backup and restore of the package
selection. Please note that I have not needed to use these commands
for some time. In fact, aptitude-create-state-bundle arrived some
time after I implemented this; I have not
On 04/23/2013 09:12 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed packages except those
automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as
i but not as i A. And if there is no command to list
On 24 Apr 2013, Lars Nooden wrote:
On 04/23/2013 09:12 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i
Mark Weyer wrote at 2013-04-23 16:12 -0500:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as i but
not as i A. And if there is no command to list
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:12:44PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i A. And if there
is no command to list this, where in /etc (or whereever
On 4/23/2013 17:12, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i A. And if
there is no command to list
Hi Mark,
the following should work, listing only the manually installed packages.
aptitude search '?installed?not(?automatic)' -F %p | sed 's/ //g'
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Mark Weyer m...@weyer-zuhause.de wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
On 4/23/2013 17:11, staticsafe wrote:
On 4/23/2013 17:12, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as i but not as i
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:12:44 +0200
Mark Weyer m...@weyer-zuhause.de wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
dependencies.
snip
aptitude search '~i!~M'
--
EMACS is my operating system
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:12:44PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as i but
not as i
On Vi, 11 feb 11, 02:17:43, Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
Hi all,
I just upgraded from 5.0.8 to 6.0 and everything seems to be fine.
However, being slightly paranoid, I'd like to run a diff between
the packages installed on my system and the list of packages installed
on a clean 6.0 installation
Hi all,
I just upgraded from 5.0.8 to 6.0 and everything seems to be fine.
However, being slightly paranoid, I'd like to run a diff between
the packages installed on my system and the list of packages installed
on a clean 6.0 installation. I removed some old libs and stuff so
I want to be sure
on 02:17 Fri 11 Feb, Teemu Rinta-aho (te...@rinta-aho.org) wrote:
Hi all,
I just upgraded from 5.0.8 to 6.0 and everything seems to be fine.
However, being slightly paranoid, I'd like to run a diff between
the packages installed on my system and the list of packages installed
on a clean 6.0
my web browsers are broken after today's upgrade - iceweasel refuse to
start, and epiphany dies frequently. it might be caused by today's
upgrade for my web browsers have been working fine since this noon. so i
want to redo the upgrade i made today, how could i got it? thanks
--
My platform is
In 1241778796.3522.8.ca...@minjue.jlu.edu.cn, 明覺 wrote:
my web browsers are broken after today's upgrade - iceweasel refuse to
start, and epiphany dies frequently. it might be caused by today's
upgrade for my web browsers have been working fine since this noon. so i
want to redo the upgrade i made
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 06:00 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 1241778796.3522.8.ca...@minjue.jlu.edu.cn, 明覺 wrote:
my web browsers are broken after today's upgrade - iceweasel refuse to
start, and epiphany dies frequently. it might be caused by today's
upgrade for my web browsers have
In 1241783001.3432.1.ca...@minjue.jlu.edu.cn, 明覺 wrote:
web browsers still do not work, it's a strange thing, how could i solve
it?
You question is not descriptive enough. Read
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html and then rephrase.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,=
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:24 -0400, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 1241783001.3432.1.ca...@minjue.jlu.edu.cn, 明覺 wrote:
web browsers still do not work, it's a strange thing, how could i solve
it?
You question is not descriptive enough. Read
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:44:30PM +0800, 明覺 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:24 -0400, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 1241783001.3432.1.ca...@minjue.jlu.edu.cn, 明覺 wrote:
web browsers still do not work, it's a strange thing, how could i solve
it?
You question is not descriptive
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 19:43, 明覺 shi.min...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 06:00 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Read /var/log/aptitude (if you used aptitude) and /var/log/apt/term.log (for
apt-get).
thank you, i have found it and removed those packages not necessory, but
web
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 10:50 +0800, Mr. Wang Long wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 19:43, 明覺 shi.min...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 06:00 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Read /var/log/aptitude (if you used aptitude) and /var/log/apt/term.log
(for
apt-get).
thank you, i
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 02:29 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:44:30PM +0800, 明覺 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:24 -0400, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 1241783001.3432.1.ca...@minjue.jlu.edu.cn, 明覺 wrote:
web browsers still do not work, it's a strange thing, how
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Robin rc.rattusrat...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/8 Robin rc.rattusrat...@googlemail.com:
Same problem here after upgrade today. Process of elimination left
package libc6. I downgraded to previous version, dpkg -i
/var/cache/apt/archive/libc6-$VersionNumber,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:58:13AM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
[1] Doug's method is good, but I want to automate it further. I just
have to write a sed script to make the output of 'aptitude search !~M~i'
suitable for 'dpkg --set-selections'
I'm not sure that's necessary; if the search
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:23:29PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:58:13AM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
[1] Doug's method is good, but I want to automate it further. I just
have to write a sed script to make the output of 'aptitude search !~M~i'
suitable for
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:39:59AM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
Not to be pedantic, but I'd recommend AWK for this sort of thing, e.g.,
awk '{print $2, install}' bak/pkg.list | dpkg --set-selections
Sure, I just don't know it ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:23:29PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:58:13AM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
[1] Doug's method is good, but I want to automate it further. I just
have to write a sed script to make the output of 'aptitude search !~M~i'
suitable for
Thank you again Douglas!
I'll look at all the packages you find objectionable. Some are rarely
used, of course, but my goal is to put together a rather complete but
fully standard Debian stable CLI-only rescue install, mostly because I
didn't find one, and I generally find such a separate
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:46:57AM -0800, SpamHog wrote:
Now I have a fresh base install ready in a 1-GB rescue partition.
Once the list is ready I'll make sure all the packages are indeed
installable, then I'll try to make a metapackage pulling them all in.
I only have two boxes with more
On Feb 5, 3:30 pm, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with just GRML?
What's wrong with MS-DOS?
What's wrong with AOL?
:-)
For starters, grml medium wasn't even out of beta last time I checked,
and came with a nice big proviso.
The usual other criticisms apply. Or
On Feb 5, 3:30 pm, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with just GRML?
What's wrong with MS-DOS?
What's wrong with AOL?
:-)
For starters, grml medium wasn't even out of beta last time I checked,
and came with a nice big proviso.
The usual other criticisms apply. Or
Since net-install can give you a minimal base system without a network
then yes, all base debs will be there. You could just look at the list
of debs supplied on the netinst.iso.
Thank you Douglas!
I did just that, and the following few lines distill the difference
between the debs list of
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:51:42PM -0800, SpamHog wrote:
Since net-install can give you a minimal base system without a network
then yes, all base debs will be there. ?You could just look at the list
of debs supplied on the netinst.iso.
Thank you Douglas!
I did just that, and the
. . .
--
Where is the current list of packages
included in a stable base i386 install,
both in the .iso and online?
(i.e. BEFORE installing it, that is!!!)
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
SpamHog wrote:
I am selecting a set of add-on packages
for a small service rescue install.
I would like to know what is
already included in the base install,
and in general I'd like to see
the latest version of this list of thigs.
My guess is that it might not be included
in the minimal
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:31:11AM -0800, SpamHog wrote:
I am selecting a set of add-on packages
for a small service rescue install.
I would like to know what is
already included in the base install,
and in general I'd like to see
the latest version of this list of thigs.
My guess is
Quoth Dvorzhetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I use a /etc/apt/preferences file to pick some packages from sid on my
lenny setup.
That's one of the things it's for ;-)
Is there a command to list the packages that comes from sid on my
system?
How about:
$ apt-show-versions | grep unstable
HTH
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo