On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:27:03 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
There is no software anywhere without bugs, both known and unknown.
I've been told in all seriousness, by someone wh knew what he was saying,
that Kruzeman Aretz's Algol 60 compiler, on the Electologica X-8
conputer, in its last
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 06:47:46PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
On 07/08/2011 06:04 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne writes:
I am not in the habit of installing packages that known to not work.
If the package was known not to work the bug would be grave.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 08/07/2011 22:40, Nuno Magalhães a écrit :
Upgrading database engine *IS* a complicated and highly risky task,
regardless of the engine.
And this task can't be done automatically, highly depending of what you
do with your datadases.
In production
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 08/07/2011 22:40, Nuno Magalhães a écrit :
I must say i had a big trouble upgrading mysql last time i ran
aptitude safe-upgrade; it just wouldn't upgrade since it couldn't
shutdown the server (it wasn't even running anymore).
Upgrading database
D G Teed wrote:
snip
Sorry, but your question seemed naive and still seems so. I was actually
hoping to hear my understanding of your concern was wrong.
There are thousands of web sites, big and small, using mysql and postgresql.
They all have bugs, just as any Linux or another other OS we
On 07/08/2011 06:04 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne writes:
I am not in the habit of installing packages that known to not work.
If the package was known not to work the bug would be grave.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Thanks John. That made me try again, but a bit harder
Don't forget to check the version of package libmysqlclient16.
--
Best regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
As I am doubtful as to mysql working in Debian anymore (see below)
I need a database package that works for a change in debian.
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql or are there other viable DB's?
OLD-TESTINGNo Updates since Squeeze went Stable
~# ls
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:50:36 -0400, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
As I am doubtful as to mysql working in Debian anymore (see below)
I need a database package that works for a change in debian.
I've used MySQL since Lenny (I'm on Wheezy now) and I've had no problems
at all.
Is
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql
Yes, without a shadow of doubt.
or are there other viable DB's?
Yes, though I haven't used them myself, PostgreSQL serving my
needs quite nicely. There are quite a number of alternatives;
On 07/08/2011 12:55 PM, Michael Checca wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:50:36 -0400, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
As I am doubtful as to mysql working in Debian anymore (see below)
I need a database package that works for a change in debian.
I've used MySQL since Lenny (I'm on Wheezy
Could you share the output of
dpkg -l mysql* |grep ^i
ii mysql-client 5.1.57-3 MySQL database client
(metapackage depending on the latest version)
ii mysql-client-5.1 5.1.57-3 MySQL database client binaries
ii mysql-common 5.1.57-3 MySQL
On 07/08/2011 02:01 PM, Michael Checca wrote:
Could you share the output of
dpkg -l mysql* |grep ^i
ii mysql-client 5.1.57-3 MySQL database client
(metapackage depending on the latest version)
ii mysql-client-5.1 5.1.57-3 MySQL database client binaries
ii
On 07/08/2011 12:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql
Yes, without a shadow of doubt.
or are there other viable DB's?
Yes, though I haven't used them myself, PostgreSQL serving my
needs quite
Firebird, either 2.1 or 2.5 are in squeeze .
Pablo
As I am doubtful as to mysql working in Debian anymore (see below)
I need a database package that works for a change in debian.
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql or are there other viable DB's?
OLD-TESTINGNo Updates since
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 12:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql
Yes, without a shadow of doubt.
or are there other viable DB's?
Yes,
On 07/08/11 at 04:42pm, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 12:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql
Yes, without a shadow of
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 17:57, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql
Yes, without a shadow of doubt.
Why?
I must say i had a big trouble upgrading mysql last time i ran
aptitude safe-upgrade; it just wouldn't upgrade since it couldn't
shutdown the
On 07/08/2011 04:27 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
On 07/08/11 at 04:42pm, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 12:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Is postgresql more reliable then
There are many reasons to move away from mysql (standard) - your reason
isn't a viable one.
Postgresql has a friendlier license, more features, and has more compliant
engines (and, IIRC a binary transaction log)
Mongo works nice with js and is fast as hell.
Drizzle (mysql fork) is better than
On 07/08/2011 03:42 PM, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 12:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Is postgresql more reliable then mysql
Yes, without a shadow of doubt.
or
WT writes:
Only to the extent that I would like to install a working database on
one of the Squeeze- Sid partitions and there are bugs in all I have
tried so far.
There are bugs in _everything_. We just happen to know about these
ones.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Wayne writes:
I am not in the habit of installing packages that known to not work.
If the package was known not to work the bug would be grave.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 07/08/2011 06:04 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne writes:
I am not in the habit of installing packages that known to not work.
If the package was known not to work the bug would be grave.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
True! But I am seeing more non grave lately then I am
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 03:42 PM, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 12:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
Is
Heh, maybe you Google 'trusting trust'. It's cs 'theory'.
On Jul 8, 2011 6:48 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 06:04 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne writes:
I am not in the habit of installing packages that known to not work.
If the package was known not to work the bug
On 07/08/2011 09:02 PM, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 03:42 PM, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 12:57 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at
27 matches
Mail list logo
