2014-04-09 6:53 GMT+02:00 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Mutt, as with other MUAs, creates a header cache so it only needs to
read the headers of new mail files. If you're slowing down with large
maildir folders, the most likely problem is that your header caching is
not working
On 9 Apr 2014, at 07:19, Raffaele Morelli raffaele.more...@gmail.com wrote:
There a set header_cache option to add in muttrc.
Yes turn that on. It makes a big difference. Consider also archiving older mail
to a compressed mbox via the archivemail tool.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:19:09AM CEST, Raffaele Morelli
raffaele.more...@gmail.com said:
2014-04-09 6:53 GMT+02:00 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Mutt, as with other MUAs, creates a header cache so it only needs to
read the headers of new mail files. If you're slowing down with
On Ma, 08 apr 14, 22:47:05, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Of late, I've observed that folders with over 1000 messages seem quite
slow to respond (order of 3-4 seconds), which wasn't really happening
in the old days when I was using mboxes.
I get at most 2-3 seconds with 12000+ messages Maildirs :)
I've seen that mutt was faster when using a locl imap server, with
header_cache and tokyocabinet as a db lib, than with same setting and
direct maildir access.
I wrote a console-based mail-client, with lua scripting, modelled
upon mutt:
http://lumail.org/
Although it is unlikely I
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:34:17AM +0100, Steve wrote:
http://lumail.org/
Although it is unlikely I wonder if anybody here has tested it under
ext4?
I'd never heard of it, but thanks for sharing, it looks interesting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:29:26AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 08 apr 14, 22:47:05, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Of late, I've observed that folders with over 1000 messages seem quite
slow to respond (order of 3-4 seconds), which wasn't really happening
in the old days when I was using
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:53:52PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
As with any MUA directly accessing maildir files performance gradually
slows down over time with more and more mail files because they are
scattered across the filesystem, especially with EXT, much less so with
XFS. Seeking to
Dear Debian User,
Of late, I've observed that opening my Maildir boxes in Mutt has been
a tad slow. Here is the rough structure:
I have an LVM home directory (ext4), within which I have a folder
called ~/Maildir. This folder has several Maildirs, say inbox,
debian-user etc., each of which gets
On 4/8/2014 9:47 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Debian User,
Of late, I've observed that opening my Maildir boxes in Mutt has been
a tad slow. Here is the rough structure:
I have an LVM home directory (ext4), within which I have a folder
called ~/Maildir. This folder has several Maildirs,
10 matches
Mail list logo
