On 2011-04-11 07:01 +0200, Greg Madden wrote:
On Sunday 10 April 2011 08:31:09 pm Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In banlktingt-wi8denptcvnyy+wsmuywo...@mail.gmail.com, chris wrote:
It was a intentional decision I believe. My understanding is that all
non-free binary firmware was removed from
From what I can tell it looks like keyspan.fw is missing from the
Squeeze repository, so I assume that warrants a defect.
... warrants a bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Non free firmware being missing isn't a bug
On Apr 10, 2011 4:03 PM, Rolf Brudeseth m...@brudeseth.name wrote:
From what I can tell it looks like keyspan.fw is missing from the Squeeze
repository, so I assume that warrants a defect.
... warrants a bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Chris,
Maybe you could suggest the correct way to request the firmware be
added to the appropriate package?
Rolf
On 04/10/2011 03:11 PM, chris wrote:
Non free firmware being missing isn't a bug
On Apr 10, 2011 4:03 PM, Rolf Brudeseth m...@brudeseth.name
mailto:m...@brudeseth.name wrote:
It was a intentional decision I believe. My understanding is that all
non-free binary firmware was removed from squeeze as per their foss beliefs.
You can voice your opinion against it but I don't think it will change the
tide. Did you grab the firmware for it from the web yet/
On Sun, Apr 10,
In banlktingt-wi8denptcvnyy+wsmuywo...@mail.gmail.com, chris wrote:
It was a intentional decision I believe. My understanding is that all
non-free binary firmware was removed from squeeze as per their foss beliefs.
Most, if not all, of the firmware that was removed from main is available from
On Sunday 10 April 2011 08:31:09 pm Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In banlktingt-wi8denptcvnyy+wsmuywo...@mail.gmail.com, chris wrote:
It was a intentional decision I believe. My understanding is that all
non-free binary firmware was removed from squeeze as per their foss
beliefs.
Most, if
7 matches
Mail list logo
