On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net wrote:
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net wrote:
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution -
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net wrote:
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:01:25 +0300
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
When network.proxy.socks_remote_dns is set to true, the DNS
requests are sent through the SOCKS connection and delivered to
your computer at home (which ultimately is sent to your ISP but you
already thrust it with
On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net wrote:
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:36:37AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't do so. Ssh only provides SOCKS4 proxy, and SOCKS4 can not tunnel
DNS requests (or any UDP traffic for that matter).
How old is your information on that? Even in Squeeze the man-page for
ssh says:
,
| Currently the SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 protocols
Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how those work, you will have your Internet
service with you no matter where you are, as
Jeremy Leonard wrote:
There is also a carrier called Ting that sells a wifi hotspot. The
billing is based on what you use and I've heard good things about them.
The wifi hotspot device can be found at https://ting.com/shop/Netgear-Zing
The cost structure is appropriate for my predicted usage.
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the US?
Yes
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the US?
Yes
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how those work, you will
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service? The way I
understand how those work, you will have your Internet service with you
no matter where you are, as long as you can get a signal from your provider.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the US?
I'd suggest that a laptop with
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell
Hi Richard.
I faced a similar situation although a bit differently a few months ago.
The only WISP in the area announced they were shutting down the present
service which ran at 512 kbps and would offer upgrades to a new service
that runs 10 Mbps. Fine, but what they did not say officially was
There is also a carrier called Ting that sells a wifi hotspot. The
billing is based on what you use and I've heard good things about them.
The wifi hotspot device can be found at https://ting.com/shop/Netgear-Zing
bald_bohemian
On 06/17/2015 12:58 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was
Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to
one physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
What questions should I be asking?
Please note
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at = 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
25 matches
Mail list logo
