Re: Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?

On 07.05.19 09:05, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > So, I'll use "publicly" -- I was going to do that, but it just seemed wrong > at > the time ;-) It seems harder to remember uncommon spelling now than when I was younger, and until the spellchecker disagreed, I'd gone with your spelling - it's more

Way OT: “Publicly” and “publically” (was: Re: Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?])

> On Tuesday, May 07, 2019 08:41:16 AM Erik Christiansen wrote: > > P.S. s/publically/publicly (Yep, spellchecking in Vim in Mutt is OK > > > > with that. Caveat: I use a British > > dictionary. Haven't checked for possible > >

Re: Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?

Thanks for your reply, and thanks for putting it on the list! Oh, and thanks for checking the spelling (kmail, at least the version I use, doesn't check spelling (or maybe I haven't enabled spellcheck). (I may check the US spelling at some point -- ah, ok, a quick google finds: “Publicly” and

Netiquette [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?

On 07.05.19 07:38, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote off-list: > On Tuesday, May 07, 2019 12:01:49 AM Erik Christiansen wrote: > > only the author is dumb enough > > Why use language like that? (It does not contribute to the welcoming > environment that I'd like to see cultivated here.) > > Aside: