Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:21:20PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote: > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > like to install Debian. > > I've found one very slim image of that, which ran

Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 02:08:58AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:22 PM Michael Jinks > wrote: > > > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > > like to

Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:22 PM Michael Jinks wrote: > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > like to install Debian. > > I've found one very slim image of that, which ran without

Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:21:20PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote: > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > like to install Debian. > > I've found one very slim image of that, which ran

Network setup on Raspberry Pi

I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd like to install Debian. I've found one very slim image of that, which ran without issue, but left nothing in the way of a network. So now I'm trying

Re: Network setup by installer

[Some rampant snipping, I'm afraid. Hope that is ok.] On Thu 01 Feb 2018 at 09:41:36 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 01 Feb 2018 at 10:55:35 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > > > Intended to do what? > > > > To leave the user without network connectivity after first boot? There > > are at

Re: Network setup by installer

On Thu 01 Feb 2018 at 10:55:35 (+), Brian wrote: > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 20:05:17 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 23:13:52 (+), Brian wrote: > > > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian

Re: Network setup by installer

On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 20:05:17 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 23:13:52 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark

Re: Network setup by installer

On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 23:13:52 (+), Brian wrote: > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > > > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian

Re: Network setup by installer

On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > So, I return to the essential question, which I led

Re: Network setup by installer

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 10:59:31AM +, Brian wrote: > > The technique just replaces installing over a wireless link from the > start. I've been wondering why you chose not to do that and avoid the > extra work. Sorry for the delay in replying. An early draft of one of my previous mails in

Re: Network setup by installer

On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 12:18:45 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 15:21:31 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 08:27:22 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > With wireless, there's no real equivalent to the wire > > > being connected. Even when installed and configured

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 15:21:31 (+), Brian wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 08:27:22 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: >

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 +, Brian wrote: > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > To get out of the situation I'm in on those two machines, I just need to > > hand-craft the interfaces file to something like what you have above, > > with appropriate device,

Re: Network setup by installer

On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So, I return to the

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > > > > So, I return to the essential question, which I led with in my original > > post, which is which

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 08:27:22 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > Hello the list > > > > > > > > Can anyone point me at

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > It is unclear to me why you can't configure the wireless interface using ssh > > through the wired interface? > > Thanks for replying. I am not sure what problem you

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > Hello the list > > > > > > Can anyone point me at documentation of how the installer sets up > > > network interfaces, out

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > Hello the list > > > > Can anyone point me at documentation of how the installer sets up > > network interfaces, out of the several ways there are to do it? > > > > I've done a couple of

Re: Network setup by installer

On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: Hello the list Can anyone point me at documentation of how the installer sets up network interfaces, out of the several ways there are to do it? I've done a couple of installs of Stretch, one when it was still testing and one recently, on different

Network setup by installer

Hello the list Can anyone point me at documentation of how the installer sets up network interfaces, out of the several ways there are to do it? I've done a couple of installs of Stretch, one when it was still testing and one recently, on different hardware that both had both wired and

Re: network setup

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:14:57PM +, Brian wrote: > On Wed 14 Dec 2016 at 14:03:09 +0100, David Jardine wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > When I ran machines containing two identical ethernet cards, it > > > was lucky dip as to

Re: network setup

. On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Erwan David wrote: Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 02:49:24 From: Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:49:43 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at

Re: network setup

2016 07:55:26 From: Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:55:43 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org If all you want is a single wireless connection which is activated when the machine boots

Re: network setup

On Wed 14 Dec 2016 at 14:03:09 +0100, David Jardine wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > [...] > > > > When I ran machines containing two identical ethernet cards, it > > was lucky dip as to which card got which name. That alone would > > have made the new

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: [...] > > When I ran machines containing two identical ethernet cards, it > was lucky dip as to which card got which name. That alone would > have made the new method far preferable, had it been available at > the time. But don't

Re: network setup

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 11:33:21 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > David's answer illustrated my point so beautifully that i had to > say thanks. What point??? Lisi

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:14:30AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 14 December 2016 09:13:49 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: >

Re: network setup

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 09:13:49 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > [...] > > > Eh? How does calling something by the string "wlx00c0ca364bd2" instead > > of "wlan0" make it less

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: [...] > Eh? How does calling something by the string "wlx00c0ca364bd2" instead > of "wlan0" make it less accessible? Thank you! You just highlighted why I'm not staying for long in that

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:08:01PM CET, Greg Wooledge said: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:02:45PM +, Brian wrote: > > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 20:48:46 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > > > Do you think eno167778 will be more useful than eth0 to a new user ? > > > My God, why

Re: network setup

On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 21:52:15 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:44:39PM +, Brian wrote: > > [...] > > > For someone who has been using Debian for many years the position you > > expound is understandable and viable to support [...] > > > But remember new users;

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:02:45PM +, Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 20:48:46 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > > Do you think eno167778 will be more useful than eth0 to a new user ? > My God, why must I use eno167778, he will say? I must change > this to something I like. connection0 looks

Re: network setup

On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 20:48:46 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > Le 12/13/2016 à 20:44, Brian a écrit : > > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 14:40:47 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >>>

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:44:39PM +, Brian wrote: [...] > For someone who has been using Debian for many years the position you > expound is understandable and viable to support [...] > But remember new users; does it really matter to them?

Re: network setup

Le 12/13/2016 à 20:44, Brian a écrit : > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 14:40:47 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ >>> lists three options:

Re: network setup

On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 14:40:47 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: > > [...] > > > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ > > lists three options: > > Thanks! For someone who has been using

Re: network setup

That is one network access point, yes. However, where I am, I get about 10 of those, and must then read down to ESSID: to find the name. Each access point grouping starts with Cell 0? so by skipping to each new Cell number, I can find the next access point to verify if it is mine. -- Charlie

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: [...] > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ > lists three options: Thanks! regards - -- t -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:18:11PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 07:43:06PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: I tried manual network configuration and debian renamed wlan0 to wlx00c0ca364bd2 for some reason. This is (somewhat ironically) called a "predictable interface

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 07:43:06PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I tried manual network configuration and debian renamed wlan0 to > wlx00c0ca364bd2 for some reason. This is (somewhat ironically) called a "predictable interface name". I don't know

Re: network setup

If all you want is a single wireless connection which is activated when the machine boots you do not need a wpa_supplicant.conf. Everything can be done in /etc/network/interfaces. It is the simplest, most hassle-free and most straightforward way to proceed. First check that network-manager is not

Re: network setup

: Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:42:01 From: Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:42:18 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Sun 11 Dec 2016 at 19:43:06 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: I tried

Re: network setup

:43:06 From: Jude DaShiell <jdash...@panix.com> To: Charlie Kravetz <c...@teamcharliesangels.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:43:25 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org I tried manual network configura

Re: network setup

On Sun 11 Dec 2016 at 19:43:06 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I tried manual network configuration and debian renamed wlan0 to > wlx00c0ca364bd2 for some reason. If I do ip a that shows up as possible > wifi connection. Unfortunately ifup doesn't recognize that device name. It is unclear (to

Re: network setup

Dec 2016, Charlie Kravetz wrote: Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:47:08 From: Charlie Kravetz <c...@teamcharliesangels.com> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:35:08 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP

Re: network setup

On Sun 11 Dec 2016 at 10:47:08 -0800, Charlie Kravetz wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:13:33 -0500 (EST) > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > >When I used wpa_passphrase I put about 5 lines into > >/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf which wasn't the original from the >

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:13:33 -0500 (EST) Jude DaShiell wrote: >When I used wpa_passphrase I put about 5 lines into >/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf which wasn't the original from the >documentation but a new file.

Re: network setup

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:13:33PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > When I used wpa_passphrase I put about 5 lines into > /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf which wasn't the original from the > documentation but a new file. The first line said network= and that was > all. For a wifi

network setup

When I used wpa_passphrase I put about 5 lines into /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf which wasn't the original from the documentation but a new file. The first line said network= and that was all. For a wifi connection, what should go in that network= field? --

Re: network setup for xen on a laptop

Henning Follmann, 7.02.2014: Hello, I just setup a laptop for development. I usually have multiple XEN instances for development purposes. My previous setup was a desktop with e static ethernet setup. that was fairly easy. I had one iface br0 instance in my /etc/network/interfaces With

network setup for xen on a laptop

Hello, I just setup a laptop for development. I usually have multiple XEN instances for development purposes. My previous setup was a desktop with e static ethernet setup. that was fairly easy. I had one iface br0 instance in my /etc/network/interfaces With the laptop it is different. Most of the

Re: network setup for xen on a laptop

For laptops you need two networks. A nat network and a host only network. On Feb 7, 2014 5:51 AM, Henning Follmann hfollm...@itcfollmann.com wrote: Hello, I just setup a laptop for development. I usually have multiple XEN instances for development purposes. My previous setup was a desktop

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On 05/27/11 at 08:03pm, Volkan YAZICI wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:56:39 + (UTC), Camaleón writes: ifdown/ifup and maybe /etc/init.d/networking restart just to be sure :-) My /etc/network/interfaces is empty, but loopback device. I'm just issuing plain old ifconfig, and IMHO it

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On Mon, 30 May 2011 03:13:16 -0400, William Hopkins writes: On 05/27/11 at 08:03pm, Volkan YAZICI wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:56:39 + (UTC), Camaleón writes: ifdown/ifup and maybe /etc/init.d/networking restart just to be sure :-) My /etc/network/interfaces is empty, but loopback

Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

Hi, I'm trying to setup an ad-hoc Wi-Fi network, but having trouble to get it working. Below are the steps I follow. foo# iwconfig wlan0 mode ad-hoc chan 11 essid inci foo# ifconfig wlan0 192.168.1.1 bar# iwconfig wlan0 mode ad-hoc chan 11 essid inci bar# ifconfig wlan0 192.168.1.2

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:44:36 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: I'm trying to setup an ad-hoc Wi-Fi network, but having trouble to get it working. Below are the steps I follow. foo# iwconfig wlan0 mode ad-hoc chan 11 essid inci foo# ifconfig wlan0 192.168.1.1 bar# iwconfig wlan0 mode

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On Fri, 27 May 2011 15:49:39 + (UTC), Camaleón writes: On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:44:36 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: I'm trying to setup an ad-hoc Wi-Fi network, but having trouble to get it working. Below are the steps I follow. foo# iwconfig wlan0 mode ad-hoc chan 11 essid inci foo#

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On Fri, 27 May 2011 19:17:06 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2011 15:49:39 + (UTC), Camaleón writes: On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:44:36 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: I'm trying to setup an ad-hoc Wi-Fi network, but having trouble to get it working. Below are the steps I follow.

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

Maybe a look at http://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/AdHoc can be helpful. -- Regards, Jörg-Volker. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:40:48 + (UTC), Camaleón writes: It can be trivial but did you also restart the wlan0 interfaces? While I was issuing iwconfig commands, wlan0 was already set down; after iwconfig I waked up the wlan0 via ifconfig. What do you mean by restarting an interface? Best.

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On Fri, 27 May 2011 19:51:59 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:40:48 + (UTC), Camaleón writes: It can be trivial but did you also restart the wlan0 interfaces? While I was issuing iwconfig commands, wlan0 was already set down; after iwconfig I waked up the wlan0 via

Re: Ad-Hoc Wi-Fi Network Setup

On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:56:39 + (UTC), Camaleón writes: ifdown/ifup and maybe /etc/init.d/networking restart just to be sure :-) My /etc/network/interfaces is empty, but loopback device. I'm just issuing plain old ifconfig, and IMHO it should be working. I need to find a way to get more

Re: network setup question

Hi, Miles: On Thursday 06 May 2010 14:12:56 Miles Fidelman wrote: Thanks to all who replied. I'm starting to zero in on this now. A few more details: To follow up with a few more details: server1 -- hub (switch) --- server 2 datacenter's router The hub is a

Re: network setup question

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 22:25 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: On 5/5/2010 9:11 PM, Alex Samad wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:55 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: [snip] - I have two network /27 network blocks that are NOT contiguous - I

Re: network setup question

if I change the netmask of the server it can no longer talk to the router because it is in a different ip network ie 192.168.11.55/22 can't talk to 192.168.11.1/24 (you can fake it on linux with iproute - see my other answer to this thread). That does not look correct. Just to see how it works,

Re: network setup question

On 5/6/2010 12:05 AM, Alex Samad wrote: well think about it, if we are talking about network 192.168.11.0/24 (for my example I will use 24 instead of 27) the server would have an address 192.168.11.55/24 (for example) and the router would have 192.168.11.1/24 if I change the netmask of the

Re: network setup question

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 13:35, Kevin Ross ke...@familyross.net wrote: On 5/6/2010 12:05 AM, Alex Samad wrote: well think about it, if we are talking about network 192.168.11.0/24 (for my example I will use 24 instead of 27) the server would have an address 192.168.11.55/24 (for example) and

Re: network setup question

On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 01:05 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: On 5/6/2010 12:05 AM, Alex Samad wrote: [snip] What am I missing? nothing in your case it work, but they are supposed to be hosts in different networks. Which was the point I was trying to get at. And to be carefully - especially if

Re: network setup question

Anand Sivaram wrote: On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 06:36, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: details ommitted http://lists.debian.org/4be2162b.8050...@meetinghouse.net Are you using static IP or using dhcp? If you are using static, then

Re: network setup question

Thanks to all who replied. I'm starting to zero in on this now. A few more details: To follow up with a few more details: server1 -- hub (switch) --- server 2 | | datacenter's router The hub is a basic $40 gigE switch (not

Re: network setup question

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Thanks to all who replied.  I'm starting to zero in on this now. A few more details: [snip] on server 1: eth0: inet addr:207.154.13.48  Bcast:207.154.13.63  Mask:255.255.255.224 (first netblock)

network setup question

the inter-box traffic go directly through the gigE switch, and not reach the datacenter's router. Which leaves me with some questions that are just a bit beyond my general network setup knowledge: 1. Yes, I have a cross-over cable plugged directly between the 2nd ethernet card in each box. I plan

Re: network setup question

there to be a lot of inter-box traffic. So I'm now looking for a way to have the inter-box traffic go directly through the gigE switch, and not reach the datacenter's router. Which leaves me with some questions that are just a bit beyond my general network setup knowledge: 1. Yes, I have a cross

Re: network setup question

On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: Not sure if this is the right list, sort of a general linux networking question (pointers to a more appropriate list welcomed) Setup: - I have two servers in a datacenter, currently used for different things - I have one gigE cable coming in

Re: network setup question

there to be a lot of inter-box traffic. So I'm now looking for a way to have the inter-box traffic go directly through the gigE switch, and not reach the datacenter's router. Which leaves me with some questions that are just a bit beyond my general network setup knowledge: 1. Yes, I have a cross

Re: network setup question

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:55 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: [snip] - I have two network /27 network blocks that are NOT contiguous - I use one for each box I'm not a networking expert, but this part seems wrong to me. I don't think you're

Re: network setup question

On 5/5/2010 9:11 PM, Alex Samad wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:55 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: [snip] - I have two network /27 network blocks that are NOT contiguous - I use one for each box I'm not a networking expert, but this

What could be wrong with my network setup

--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2999ms What could be wrong with my network setup? $ head -1 /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 helios.dnsalias.com localhost $ ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:2f:be:4b:ba

Re: What could be wrong with my network setup

% packet loss, time 2999ms What could be wrong with my network setup? $ head -1 /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 helios.dnsalias.com localhost $ ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:2f:be:4b:ba inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0

Re: What could be wrong with my network setup

T o n g wrote: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:09:38 +, T o n g wrote: I can't get any of the proxy server working on my newly installed lenny, just realize that I can't make any network connection to localhost, [snip] What could be wrong with my network setup? $ head -1 /etc/hosts

Re: What could be wrong with my network setup

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:41:42 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: $ ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:2f:be:4b:ba inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 Is that all? What's up with the lo(opback) interface? Ah, there it is: $

Re: What could be wrong with my network setup

T o n g wrote: Is the 'lo' normal? I never actually look into its output -- was just making sure the lo was there... You should up it. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: What could be wrong with my network setup

On 10/09/08 14:05, T o n g wrote: [snip] loLink encap:Local Loopback LOOPBACK MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX

Re: What could be wrong with my network setup

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:13:18 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: You should up it. yep, it works. thanks -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

VMWare network setup (newbie)

Hi, sorry if this is too basic or offtopic a question, but i didnt see a debian-newbie list or anything. Im running Etch on an IBM ThinkPad T60. I need to run a Windows application on it, so i installed VMWare Server following some detailed instructions i found on HowToForge and then installed

Re: VMWare network setup (newbie)

Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: Hi, sorry if this is too basic or offtopic a question, but i didnt see a debian-newbie list or anything. Im running Etch on an IBM ThinkPad T60. I need to run a Windows application on it, so i installed VMWare Server following some detailed instructions i found

Re: VMWare network setup (newbie)

On Thursday 16 August 2007, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: Hi, sorry if this is too basic or offtopic a question, but i didnt see a debian-newbie list or anything. Im running Etch on an IBM ThinkPad T60. I need to run a Windows application on it, so i installed VMWare Server following some

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

] | | outside(WAN) All network interfaces should be Gigabit-interfaces. So, my questions are: 1. Is this network setup realisable? I have the same exact setup as that diagram. My Debian Router is running Debian (duh) Sarge

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

[DSL-Modem] outside(WAN) All network interfaces should be Gigabit-interfaces. So, my questions are: 1. Is this network setup realisable? I have the same exact setup as that diagram. Snap My Debian Router is running Debian (duh

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

Peter Teunissen schrieb: 2. Is it correct to place the WiFi Access Point connected to the switch, or better directly to the Debian Router? Best would be to have another NIC on the router for the WAP (or use a PCI WLAN card), so you can have stricter rules in the FW for wireless clients. For

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

On 1/30/07, Kristian Lampen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Teunissen schrieb: 2. Is it correct to place the WiFi Access Point connected to the switch, or better directly to the Debian Router? Best would be to have another NIC on the router for the WAP (or use a PCI WLAN card), so you can

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

On 1/29/07, Peter Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29-jan-2007, at 21:57, Kristian Lampen wrote: [snip] 3. I want to have the possibility to see the whole network traffic with the router. Not only the traffic from the PC's through the router to the outside world. How can I manage

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/07 08:31, celejar wrote: On 1/29/07, Peter Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29-jan-2007, at 21:57, Kristian Lampen wrote: [snip] [snip] I've read something about using an old non-switching hub attached to your network and an

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

On 1/30/07, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/07 08:31, celejar wrote: On 1/29/07, Peter Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29-jan-2007, at 21:57, Kristian Lampen wrote: [snip] [snip] I've read something about using an old

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

celejar schrieb: On 29-jan-2007, at 21:57, Kristian Lampen wrote: [snip] 3. I want to have the possibility to see the whole network traffic with the router. Not only the traffic from the PC's through the router to the outside world. How can I manage this? Do I have to buy a switch

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

Kristian Lampen wrote: Another problem is that using a hub will give all connected clients the possibility to sniff the traffic. That is not what I want. Of course, sniffing is the point, as described, but as you observe, not for everyone. So, does anyone make a switch with a

Re: Small Network Setup with Debian Router

On 1/30/07, Max Hyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kristian Lampen wrote: Another problem is that using a hub will give all connected clients the possibility to sniff the traffic. That is not what I want. Of course, sniffing is the point, as described, but as you observe, not for everyone.

  1   2   3   >