On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 09:25:21AM -0800, Sreelal Chandrasenan wrote:
Isn't this the same ID10T that had all his email forwarded to the list
a few days ago?
--
When you say that you agree to a thing in principle, you mean that
you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice.
Oops, my bad, I was reading old messages.
--
When you say that you agree to a thing in principle, you mean that
you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice.
-- Otto Von Bismarck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sunday 14 December 2003 07:31 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 15:54 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) penned:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 14:08:21 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and
freely usable, but google seems to
-Original Message-
From: Terry Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:27 AM
To: debian users
Subject: Re: PDF spec (Was: Re: ooh! debian jewelry)
On Sunday 14 December 2003 07:31 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 15:54 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 14:08:21 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and freely
usable, but google seems to disagree.
Google isn't quite the all-seeing eye yet.
http://partners.adobe.com/asn/tech/pdf/specifications.jsp has e.g.
the
On Sunday 14 December 2003 09:54 am, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
http://partners.adobe.com/asn/tech/pdf/specifications.jsp has e.g.
the PDF Reference, Fourth Edition, Version 1.5 (1172 pages). xpdf seems to
handle the Acrobat 5 version of it just fine.
Hmm. Yes, that's very interesting. I
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:56:45 -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
I accessed this without registering because you provided a deep-link, but
normally, Adobe makes you go through a forms process to get this far,
AFAICT.
Nope. I very vaguely recalled it being available on developer.adobe.com
(which
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:50:32 -0600,
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I attended media production classes
for staff at Caltech in which making maximum use of these
PDF 5 features was *really* pushed hard (sometime last year).
No doubt they had also
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 15:54 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) penned:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 14:08:21 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and
freely usable, but google seems to disagree.
Google isn't quite the all-seeing eye yet.
Monique posts:
I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and freely
usable, but google seems to disagree
Should the PDF format be used and recommended by governments? The
Govt. of India is calling for opinions and this link is interesting
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 at 20:36 GMT, Terry Hancock penned:
Furthermore, PDF isn't really an open data format, just a closed one
that turned out to be easier to crack than .doc files. Adobe isn't
any nicer about sharing their standards than Microsoft is. The fact
that we have good Linux
On Saturday 13 December 2003 03:08 pm, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
Oops. Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe
and freely usable, but google seems to disagree. It references some old
links from the adobe site, but they seem to have been removed.
PDF 5.x is supposed to
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:08:07PM -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
This is equally true of DOC format, too, though. We *could* adopt
some prior version of it as a standard, seeing as several open
word processors can handle them already.
Many PDFs I get don't display correctly in gv.
The
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:08:07PM -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
It would be conceivable to call PDF 4 an open standard, since
Ghostscript can already handle it. But we really ought to make
a distinction, since the newer versions are incompatible.
Or, I could even quote the right paragraph.
On Saturday 13 December 2003 10:11 pm, Nunya wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:08:07PM -0600, Terry Hancock wrote:
It would be conceivable to call PDF 4 an open standard, since
Ghostscript can already handle it. But we really ought to make
a distinction, since the newer versions are
15 matches
Mail list logo
