On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:07:32 +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:50:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 09:43:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
I know you weren't; I was referring to Paul's remark about package
quality, which came right out of left field.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:50:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 09:43:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
I know you weren't; I was referring to Paul's remark about package
quality, which came right out of left field.
Not entirely. There's been more complaints recently
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:01:46PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:56:03PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:02:02PM +, Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 09:43:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
If you track down a specific problem with ssh (as opposed to random
sniping about package quality), I'll be more than happy to fix it as
best I can.
I'm not sniping, I'm just
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:56:03PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:02:02PM +, Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
Don't know exactly how, because ssh
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:56:03PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:02:02PM +, Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:02:02PM +, Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the
7 matches
Mail list logo
