Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-26 Thread Simon Tod
--- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Simon Tod
Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Simon Tod
Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Russell Shaw
Simon Tod wrote: Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Simon Tod
So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me that it's some sort of dependency or configuration problem... the same comment

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Russell Shaw
Simon Tod wrote: So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me that it's some sort of dependency or configuration problem... the

RE: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-19 Thread Simon Tod
Thanks. Got the cpu speed bit solved. Looking through the PCMCIA HowTo I've checked to see that /etc/pcmica/config, /etc/default/pcmcia and /etc/init.d/pcmica are the same under both kernels. My new kernel is missing the line serial_cs 4384 0 (unused) from lsmod. Under the

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-19 Thread Russell Shaw
Simon Tod wrote: Thanks. Got the cpu speed bit solved. Looking through the PCMCIA HowTo I've checked to see that /etc/pcmica/config, /etc/default/pcmcia and /etc/init.d/pcmica are the same under both kernels. My new kernel is missing the line serial_cs 4384 0 (unused) from

RE: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-18 Thread Narins, Josh
I have a 1000 Mhz that was originally recognized as 667Mhz Look for these files /proc/cpufreq /proc/sys/cpu/0/{speed|speed-min|speed-max} if you have those, all you have to do is cat /proc/sys/cpu/0/speed-max /proc/sys/cpu/0/speed check the results with cat /proc/cpufreq If you have