And don't reply with: Have you tried mutt? I have. I do not like mutt or elm
Hmm. What's the problem w/ mutt ?
If it's too awful, it could be great to develop a Gnome or GTK interface to
it. Is it possible - if a developper could answer - ?
Have you tried Kmail, The KDE mail software ? I know,
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 09:01:10PM +, Nathan Valentine wrote:
Sami Dalouche wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 12:37:09PM +0100, BENJAMIN FARRELL wrote:
Heres a good point about linux, anyone found a good irc client for x
(other
than Bitchx in a E-Term :) that doesn't crash
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 11:43:27PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
Sorry, but OE doesn't deserve to be called a email client. You can't
quote quoted-printable encoded mails, you are placed on top on a reply
(thous encouraging the newbie to answer above the text and leave a
full quote
Mark == Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have yet to see a program on any operating system that comes close
to the power of gnus.
Mark Which also starts you off at the top.
Not if you don't want this. It is a changeable, as everything
else.
The problem is not the cursor at the top (I
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 12:25:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 11:43:27PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski
wrote:
Sorry, but OE doesn't deserve to be called a email client. You
can't quote quoted-printable encoded mails, you are placed on
top on a reply (thous encouraging
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:35:54AM +0100, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 12:25:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 11:43:27PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski
wrote:
Sorry, but OE doesn't deserve to be called a email client. You
Placing the cursor at the
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:49:57AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Oh, indeed - the signature placement is just plain wrong,
I'm pretty sure it encourages no .sig delimiters too - you have to
insert your own, and even then it strips the trailing space.
and the quote
line is bad too (although not
To a certain extent I have to agree, but where I REALLY think Linux lags
behind
is email. I miss an email client coming close to for instance Outlook Express
and The Bat! for Windows (or even Eudora!). The only one is XFmail which
currently is not being developed it seems.
The Outlook
I use the Netscape Mail program and am quite happy with it.
I've recently returned to Netscape Mail from Pegasus, which is nice,
but has a few little annoying things that Netscape doesn't:
New messages appear in the New Mail folder. Once they move from
there (after reading) they can't be put
];
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
suse-linux-e@suse.com suse-linux-e@suse.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: 28 March 1999 21:23
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] What DO you lose with Linux ???
mmm I must be delusional. I
Sami Dalouche wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 12:37:09PM +0100, BENJAMIN FARRELL wrote:
Heres a good point about linux, anyone found a good irc client for x (other
than Bitchx in a E-Term :) that doesn't crash everytime you click (yagirc
Yes ! There's Bitchx in an X-Term :-)
xchat
On 03-Jul-99 Sami Dalouche wrote:
anyone). I still find for everyday use Win95/NT is better (quaking, ircing)
To a certain extent I have to agree, but where I REALLY think Linux lags behind
is email. I miss an email client coming close to for instance Outlook Express
and The Bat! for Windows
Christian == Christian Dysthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian To a certain extent I have to agree, but where I REALLY
Christian think Linux lags behind is email. I miss an email client
Christian coming close to for instance Outlook Express and The Bat!
Christian for Windows (or even
-Original Message-
From: Robert V. MacQuarrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian-User-Mailing-List debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: BENJAMIN FARRELL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 31 March 1999 08:00
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] What DO you lose with Linux ???
Heres a good point about linux, anyone
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
suse-linux-e@suse.com suse-linux-e@suse.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: 28 March 1999 21:23
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] What DO you lose with Linux ???
mmm
BENJAMIN FARRELL wrote:
Heres a good point about linux, anyone found a good irc client for x (other
than Bitchx in a E-Term :) that doesn't crash everytime you click (yagirc
I gave up on irc a long time ago, even while in WinXX. The S/N ratio
was too low.
Heres a good point about linux, anyone found a good irc client for x
(other
than Bitchx in a E-Term :) that doesn't crash everytime you click (yagirc
anyone).
The last time I looked there are several IRC clients for X..
I still find for everyday use Win95/NT is better (quaking, ircing,
-linux-e@suse.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: 28 March 1999 21:23
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] What DO you lose with Linux ???
mmm I must be delusional. I haven't booted my Win95 side in months
(When SuSE 6.1 with the 2.2.x
BENJAMIN FARRELL wrote:
Heres a good point about linux, anyone found a good irc client for x (other
than Bitchx in a E-Term :) that doesn't crash everytime you click (yagirc
anyone). I still find for everyday use Win95/NT is better (quaking, ircing,
browsing, ftping). It seems that linux has
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] What DO you lose with Linux ???
Date: Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 12:37:09PM +0100
In reply to:BENJAMIN FARRELL
Quoting BENJAMIN FARRELL([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Heres a good point about linux, anyone found a good irc client for x (other
than Bitchx in a E-Term
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, ktb wrote:
BENJAMIN FARRELL wrote:
Heres a good point about linux, anyone found a good irc client for x (other
than Bitchx in a E-Term :) that doesn't crash everytime you click (yagirc
anyone). I still find for everyday use Win95/NT is better (quaking, ircing,
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
suse-linux-e@suse.com suse-linux-e@suse.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: 28 March 1999 21:23
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] What DO you lose with Linux ???
mmm I must be delusional. I haven't
mmm I must be delusional. I haven't booted my Win95 side in months
(When SuSE 6.1 with the 2.2.x kernel comes out I will reclaim that space
for Linux) so how am I keeping my checkbook balanced and reconciled?
Must be a phantom copy of cbb. I do my symbolic math with MuPAD 3.4
instead of
23 matches
Mail list logo
