On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the
command:
apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message:
Reading package lists... Done
Building
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0600, Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having problem installing qemu-kvm from apt-get. When I run the command:
apt-get install qemu-kvm using root user I got this error message:
...snip..
Strange. I'm running wheezy. I assume
Roberto Cantalapiedra wrote:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package qemu-kvm is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another
Angelin Lalev schreef:
This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my brand new
Debian 5.0 installation:
[snip]
Is that an indication that the mirror is not ok, or I am doing something wrong.
You are using the ftp.egr.msu.edu mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list.
It
Use apt-get spy but read this about apt-get for the future...
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#pkgmgmt
Sjors Gielen wrote:
Angelin Lalev schreef:
This is a partial output of apt-get update command, performed on my
brand new
Debian 5.0
Vwaju wrote:
With a little help from my friends, I'm teaching myself networking by
building an internet server. I am running Debian Linux 3.1
I would upgrade to Debian 4 (Etch) via Internet by doing these steps:
1.) apt-get clean
2.) replace your /etc/apt/sources.list with this:
deb
Vwaju wrote:
[snip]
Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1 [228kB]
Err ftp://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main monit 1:4.5-1
Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP:
35.9.37.225 21]
Failed to fetch
Bob Cox wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 16:26:08 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Firstly, try use another mirror in your /etc/apt/sources.list, for example
ftp.cz.debian.org or ftp.de.debian.org.
No. There is no sarge repository on these servers either. The OP
Thank you Bob and Eugene.
Bob --
Yes, inserting:
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian sarge main
into
/etc/apt/sources.list
and then running
#apt-get update
does the trick.
Might there be a guide to using apt that is conceptually clearer than
the man page?
Best Regards,
Vwaju
--
To
[ Please don't top post. ]
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:23:58 +0100, Josep M. wrote:
Hello Eugene.
Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is
upgraded:
The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without
needed, and I would like change this.
Josep M. wrote:
Hello.
With aptitude dist-upgrade all is ok but apt-get dist-upgrade want
delete a lot of packages...how can I fix it?
[snip]
Firstly, please not post locale-specific output of commands, use LANG=C
command instead.
Secondly, yes, aptitude now has better dependency-resolution
Hello Eugene.
Thanks, I will change in next msgs, about apt-get upgrade nothing is
upgraded:
The problem is that apt-get want remove a lot of packages without
needed, and I would like change this.
deb:# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load:
API module structure `php4_module' in file
Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen
(a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade durchzufuehren.
okay, habe ich gemacht. Nun
On 31.10.06 22:20:48, Tom Schmitt wrote:
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...Syntax error on line 1 of
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php4.load:
API module structure `php4_module' in file
Da ist ein Fehler in der php4.load. Das php4 Modul temporaer disablen
(a2dismod) hilft das Upgrade
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:20 schrieb Tom Schmitt:
Ich habe gewiß noch einige Wissenlücken zu füllen in Sachen Aufbau
von Debian. ZB ist mir nicht ganz klar, was ich mit den beiden
Meldungen machen soll, die beim Update noch aufgetaucht sind:
On 28.10.06 10:30:26, Tom Schmitt wrote:
ich benutze Etch und wollte das System mal wieder mit apt-get auf den
aktuellen Stand bringen. Leider habe ich damit nun ein Problem. Folgendes
erhalte ich beim Versuch das Problem mit -f install zu lösen:
Hier sind Zeilen mit einer Laenge von 72
mattias jonsson skrev:
Har råkat ut för ett något irriterande problem
Otillfredsställda beroenden. Försök med apt-get -f install
Har du provat apt-get -f install?
Danne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gruesse!
* Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 21:46]:
Hallo,
das habe ich soweit gemacht uind dann lief es auch ganz gut bis dass dann kam:
dpkg: Ernste Warnung: Dateilisten-Datei des Paketes »slapd« fehlt, nehme an,
dass das Paket
derzeit keine Dateien installiert hat.
Gruesse!
* Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [29.08.06 09:02]:
Hallo,
habe versucht folgende pakete zu installieren.
apt-get install slapd ldap-utils phpldapadmin xml-core php4-ldap
und das kommt dann leider traurig
debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is
Schau doch mal (als root) mit ps ax ob noch ein debconf Prozess oder ein
anderer Prozeß, der etwas mit apt/dpkg/... zu tun hat, läuft. Wenn ja
kille diese Prozesse.
Auch kann es sein, daß durch dein vorhergehendes Killen einfach ein
Lockfile übriggeblieben ist. Diese Lockfiles verhindern
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote:
Hi,
I just installed mod_evasive apache module and it is working fine. But
after that I cannot install or remove anything with apt-get. ex. when
i try to install libapache-mod-perl, got error below;
Reading Package
Hi,
2006/5/20, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:29:49PM +0300, Cem Kamil Kulekci wrote:
**
1 not fully installed or removed.
**
this is your problem. until you clear out that 1 package you will not
be able to install anything.
It refers to
Problem solved. I've just written the info file manually and it worked.
Cem
Here is the info I wrote:
---
Loadmodule: evasive_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_evasive.so
Directives:
DOSHashTableSize
DOSPageCount
DOSSiteCount
DOSPageInterval
DOSSiteInterval
DOSBlockingPeriod
Aqui nem isso resolve! :(
ta ruim!
Harlei
- Original Message -
From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: apt-get problem
Harlei
isso resolve! :(
ta ruim!
Harlei
- Original Message -
From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: grupo do debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: apt-get problem
Harlei wrote
Harlei wrote:
Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get
update e ele não consegue atualizar tudo e para em alguma porcentagem
tipow 73% [Aguardando por cabeçalhos] e não sai dai... já dei apt-setup
e mudei a base de pesquisa umas 5 vezes e sempre para assim, alguns
Particularmente eu prefiro mirrors http. Acho que tinha estes
problemas quando utilizava ftp. Ei, não tem um mirror aí na unicamp?
Fabiano.
Em 18/01/06, Marcos Vinicius Lazarini[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Harlei wrote:
Aí gente, porque meu apt-get ta dando problemas? Eu tento dar apt-get
Tem sim, é o que eu uso:
http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/
Entre lá e veja os disponiveis... Se nao me engano, no sources.list vai
assim: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/debian.d/debian/
Tem mirror do marillat inclusive, beeem mais rápido :-)
As vezes eles estão mexendo no Lab
Have you tried other mirrors?
-Original Message-
From: Jess Portnoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:17 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: apt-get problem
Hello list,
I've installed debian unstable on my IMAC.
My problem is with apt-get.
I used a
Yes, I have:
/base-installer_1.13_powerpc.udeb which does not exist, what does exist
*in all the mirrors I've tested* is base-installer_1.13.4_powerpc.udeb/
I've tested 3 different mirrors.
Use Linux - live longer
Best regards,
Jess Portnoy
Rob Brenart (TT) wrote:
Have you tried other
server:/home/mike# apt-get install postfix
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 102 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B/611kB of archives. After unpacking 540kB will be used.
Preconfiguring packages ...
Moin,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote:
Hallo,
Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber
aus unstable?
nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung.
Dummerweise kann ich jetzt auch nichts installieren, da
Hans-Georg Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moin,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0100, Peter Mathis wrote:
Hallo,
Ich hatte zu Testzwecken versucht evolution zu installieren, was aber
aus unstable?
nicht funktionierte. apt-get remove evolution bringt u.a. Fehlermeldung.
Dummerweise
Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann:
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danach zeigte mir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser
mozilla-browser:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1
Version Table:
2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0
100
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2003-12-22 18:33:08, schrieb Heino Tiedemann:
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danach zeigte mir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser
mozilla-browser:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1
Version
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody
hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1 von
bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody selber nehmen.
Wenn du Probleme hast, solltest du das den zustaendigen
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:04:53PM +0100, =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal um Hilfe!
Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter Debian woody hatte,
(zunächst
Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt 1.2.1
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15:
Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin?
Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist.
Norbert
O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber!
debian:/home/ulrich# apt-get remove mozilla
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07:
Danach zeigte mir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy mozilla-browser
mozilla-browser:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1
Version Table:
2:1.2.1-2.bunk 0
Du scheinst Du bunk-1
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:17:15:
Meine Frage: Warum steht da immer noch die bunk-Version drin?
Vermutlich weil diese noch nicht vollstaendig entfernt ist.
Norbert
O.k., laut apt-get ist sie das aber!
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31:
Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ?
dpkg -l | grep mozilla
rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - mail and news support
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31:
Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ?
dpkg -l | grep mozilla
rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
rc mozilla-mailne
* =?iso-8859-1?Q? Ulrich=20F=FCrst ?= wrote:
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 15:21:07:
Ich wuerde Dir aber empfehlen bei der 1.5.x version von
backports.org zu bleiben. Alles andere versetzt Dich um Jahre
zurueck in die Vergangenheit.
Da war, soweit ich mich erinnere,
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um einen weiteren Fast-GAU zu verhindern, bitte ich jetzt doch mal
um Hilfe! Nachdem ich verschiedentlich Probleme mit Mozilla unter
Debian woody hatte, (zunächst Version 1.5 von backports.org, jetzt
1.2.1 von bunk) wollte ich mal die Version von woody
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
mozilla: Depends: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: mozilla-mailnews (= 2:1.0.0-0.woody.1) but it is not going to be
installed
Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.12.03 17:05:31:
Was sagt dpkg -l | grep mozilla ?
dpkg -l | grep mozilla
rc mozilla-browse 1.2.1-2.bunk Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
rc mozilla-mailne 1.2.1-2.bunk
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:32:56 +0100
Tim Broddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I have this idea that my local package database might be broken (?)
since it's impossible that there haven't been any package updates to
sid last week.
Anyone has any ideas on fixing this?
...
Hi
It is possible and
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote:
Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an
apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0
to remove and 3 not upgraded).
First I thought it had something to do with an old Packages file being
Thanx for the reply both. Stupid me, thought I nuked my system :)
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:22, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 07:32, Tim Broddin wrote:
Since some days I don't get any upgradable packages when doing an
apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly
begin Dany Joly quote from Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:14:50PM +
Here are my errors message :
remove an other package :
dpkp : serious warning files list file for package 'xfonts-base' missing,
assuming package has
no files currently installed.
12118 files currently installed.)
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:37:25PM -0500, Terry Hancock wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote:
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the
kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time
ago but it has not yet been
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote:
I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error
message:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages
404 Not Found
Kindly help ...
potato is old enough that
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the
kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it
has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the
price to be paid for running a more cutting edge distribution.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi ,
I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error
message:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages
404 Not Found
Likely wouldn't be any updates anyways, as potato support was
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:37:26PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote:
| Hi ,
| I was trying to get updates using apt-get and i got following error
| message:
|
| Failed to fetch
| http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/Packages
| 404 Not Found
Upgrade to Woody. Potato is no
On Monday 22 September 2003 08:32 pm, Darryl Barlow wrote:
Are you running unstable? If so, as of the last time I checked, the
kdemultimedia package is broken. A bug report was filed some time ago but it
has not yet been fixed. This is one of the joys of running unstable and the
price to
on Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:39:57PM +0100, Mark Ayliffe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I had a problem updating my two unstable machines this morning. I got the
message Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource
temporarily unavailable). Looking through the archive of this illustrious
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 13.13 schrieb Werner Gast:
Hallo Johannes,
Hallo Werner,
diese Meldungen hatte ich gestern auch. Ich bin dann auf Adrian Bunk's
Download-Seite gegangen und habe die angemeckerten Pakete mit der
Vorgabe 'ohne Versionscheck' einzeln installiert.
Manchmal braucht man halt
Johannes Bedenbender schrieb:
Hallo Liste,
ich habe jetzt damit begonnen, auf Gnome 2.2 umzusteigen. Alles was ich
brauche läuft soweit, ich würde jetzt nur noch gerne Galeon intallieren.
Ein apt-get install galeon bringt:
---
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.43 schrieb Soeren D. Schulze:
Hatte ich auch schonmal, sowas.
Was sagt
dpkg -r libpisock8
Das hat da Problem gelöst. Danke.
apt-get remove libpisock8
Das hat das Problem nicht gelöst.
Für eine genauere Diagnose müsste ich allerdings wirklich wissen, was in
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 12.26 schrieb Johannes Bedenbender:
Ein apt-get install galeon bringt:
evolution: Depends: libpisync0 but it is not going to be installed
galeon: Depends: libgconf11 (= 1.0.7) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: libgnome-vfs0 (= 1.0.3-2) but it is
Jag kommer tyvärr inteihåg vart jag hittatde apt källan men den är inte
officiell har jag för mig, tror att jag hittade den på apt-get.org, så
ev bug rapport borde nog inte gå till debian bug listan, hur som helst
trode jag att det bara var jag som hade problem. Och för ögonblicket så
kan jag inte
Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag
installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar
i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska
lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i
post/pre-skript för
joakim wrote:
Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag
installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar
i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska
lösa problemet, är det någon som kan informera om hur jag kan ändra i
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:12, joakim wrote:
Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är ett officiellt paket jag
installerat. Jag har googlat utan att hitta något bra på hur jag ändrar
i post/pre-skript och även läst bug reporten utan att fatta hur jag ska
lösa problemet, är det någon som kan
har testat det oxå, får samma svara då med. :-(
# apt-get remove freenet-unstable
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to
correct the problem.
/joakim
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:53, Jörgen Tegnér wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:12, joakim wrote:
Jag har precis
# apt-get upgrade
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to
correct the problem.
det är allt den säger, och som sagt kör man det så startar ok-loopen
/joakim
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:44, Adam Huuva wrote:
joakim wrote:
Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är
joakim:
har testat det oxå, får samma svara då med. :-(
dpkg --purge paketnamn
bör fungera, förutsatt att paketet inte har någon bugg i sitt
postrm-skript.
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
joakim wrote:
# apt-get upgrade
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to
correct the problem.
det är allt den säger, och som sagt kör man det så startar ok-loopen
Ja men Gnu, jag menar förståss ok-loopens meddelande om portar 1 - 65xxx
bla bla bla. Sök med den.
# apt-get upgrade
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to
correct the problem.
det är allt den säger, och som sagt kör man det så startar ok-loopen
/joakim
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:44, Adam Huuva wrote:
joakim wrote:
Jag har precis kolla upp det och det är
Jag hittade det precis allt det ligger i
/var/lib/dpkg/info/
för alla installerade paket
så nu ska jag nog kunna ordna till det hoppas jag på.
/joakim
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 10:02, Adam Huuva wrote:
joakim wrote:
# apt-get upgrade
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:52:42AM +0200, joakim wrote:
# apt-get remove freenet-unstable
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to
correct the problem.
har du provat med dpkg --force-configure freenet-unstable?
då slipper du att dpkg försöker konfigurera alla
jag provade precis och får tillsvar
dpkg: unknown force/refuse option `configure'
men jag har fått apt att fungerar något så där iaf, men freenet-unstable
ligger kvar och det går inte att dpkg --purge då sätter loop:en igång
igen, så frågan är om jag kan ta bort alla referenser till paketet i
joakim wrote:
jag provade precis och får tillsvar
dpkg: unknown force/refuse option `configure'
men jag har fått apt att fungerar något så där iaf, men freenet-unstable
ligger kvar och det går inte att dpkg --purge då sätter loop:en igång
igen, så frågan är om jag kan ta bort alla referenser
Adam Huuva wrote:
Nu borde du kunna gå in och lägga in en exit 0 tidigt i postrm-skriptet
så blir det kanske bra med det.
Eller om det möjligtvis är prerm...
--
Adam Huuva
V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland
Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:13:57PM +0200, joakim wrote:
jag provade precis och får tillsvar
dpkg: unknown force/refuse option `configure'
men jag har fått apt att fungerar något så där iaf, men freenet-unstable
ligger kvar och det går inte att dpkg --purge då sätter loop:en igång
igen, så
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote:
Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig.
Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar
mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så:
Freenet:s egna paket innehåller ett gulligt skalskript[0] för att
uppdatera själva jarfilen.
Fredrik Jonson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Adam Huuva wrote:
Att installera [freenet-unstable] gick inte för mig.
Om man alldeles bortser från Rätt Sätt[tm] och buggrapporteringar
mot debianpaketet som borde göras och så:
Point taken. Fast det blir ju att man slingrar sig på såna
* Gerhard Engler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
python-apt: Depends: libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0
Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3
Wie löse ich das Problem?
Das kommt bei testing leider ab und an mal vor. Nimm das python-apt
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:59:53AM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Thanks Paul,
I installed off a Knoppix CD and the login says testing/unstable. I've
probably screwed things up, but this is totally experimentation on an extra
partition. For instance, I changed my sources.list to point to
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:59:53AM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Originally I was using a self-compiled QT/KDE 3.1 on /usr/local, but I'm
currently trying to apt-get KDE3.1 w/o much luck. Circular dependancy errors
seem as bad as RPM ever was, but it may be self-induced :)
I hope you didn't blow
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:30AM +0100, Jeff Elkins wrote:
How can I repair this apt-get problem? -f does nothing.
No, it wouldn't: -f solves a very different problem. Try:
dpkg -i --force-overwrite /var/cache/apt/archives/libarts1_1.1.0-2_i386.deb
Normally I'd suggest filing a bug report
Thanks, Colin.
As a Debian newbie I would have figured that out in a year or so :)
Jeff Elkins
On Monday 10 February 2003 12:27 pm, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:30AM +0100, Jeff Elkins wrote:
How can I repair this apt-get problem? -f does nothing.
No, it wouldn't: -f
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:30AM +0100, Jeff Elkins wrote:
How can I repair this apt-get problem? -f does nothing.
I can't tell by the version numbers off the top of my head, but if
you're using unstable, wait it out until the next update and try again.
--
.''`. Baloo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Paul,
I installed off a Knoppix CD and the login says testing/unstable. I've
probably screwed things up, but this is totally experimentation on an extra
partition. For instance, I changed my sources.list to point to unstable and
did a dist-upgrade.
Originally I was using a
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 10:31:45PM -0500, Jerome Acks Jr wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote:
[snip good advice]
cd /var/cache/apt/archives
dpkg --force-overwrite -i kdelibs-dcop_4%3a3.1.0+rc6+kl-3_i386.deb
dpkg --force-overwrite -i
I would do the following. remove the package kdelibs-bin from
/var/lib/dpkg/status making sure that I have a copy of the original file.
then make the same query to apt-get and see if it overwrites the files
causing the problem.
remember that you may have the same problem if you try to reinstall
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote:
While trying fix some broken packages, I ran apt-get -f install from my
terminal...after all packages were downloaded, I got the following
error(s):
etched 49.1MB in 19m6s (42.8kB/s)
Curtis Call was roused into action on 2003-01-24 15:57 and wrote:
Disclaimer, I'm a novice so bear with me. I've run into some problems with
apt-get. Currently, when trying to use 'apt-get -f install' to clean things
up I continue to get this error:
ogd2jpr6908:/home/curtis# apt-get -f install
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:57:12PM -0700, Curtis Call wrote:
Disclaimer, I'm a novice so bear with me. I've run into some problems with
apt-get. Currently, when trying to use 'apt-get -f install' to clean things
up I continue to get this error:
ogd2jpr6908:/home/curtis# apt-get -f install
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:17:59PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
I keep getting the following error when I run 'apt-get update'
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing kernel-headers-2.4.13-586-ext3
(NewPackage)
E: Problem with
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Cristi Banciu wrote:
when I run
apt-get update
it says something like
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
W: Bizarre Error - File size is not what the server reported 0 84
W: Bizarre Error - File size is not what the
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:42, Conny Brunnkvist wrote:
changing the cache size in /etc/apt/apt.config 'APT::Cache-Limits [number];'
did not help and the
Det var inte så att du skrev ...-Limits (pluralis) i stället för -Limit
(singularis) va? ;-)
Du, det där var ett skamligt förslag! Om du
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:53:10PM +0100, Helgi Örn Helgason wrote:
Hello all!
I have this problem since yesterday with apt-get on my laptop:
--
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing kmtrace (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 04:22:55PM -0700, curtis wrote:
When I run apt-get update it will eventually stop and time out on an entry.
deb http://www.mx1.ru/~chris/openoffice unstable main contrib
deb-src http://www.mx1.ru/~chris/openoffice unstable main contrib
I'm afraid that this server is
One thing I noticed, which is probably just an artifact of word-wrapping on
your mailer, but make sure that there's no newline in your deb ... lines.
I'd be surprised if this didn't break stuff.
Secondly, it looks like you're snagging all of the official debian stuff just
fine. The problem
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 04:22:55PM -0700, curtis wrote:
sources.list
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian woody main non-free contrib
deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ woody main non-free contrib
^
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:37:11PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
I am setting up a new box and I had woody and KDE installed from a CD I
got several months ago. I was installing some more stuff and somehow
ended up with the error output below. A step that occurred before this
was to start an
Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:37:11PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
I am setting up a new box and I had woody and KDE installed from a CD I
got several months ago. I was installing some more stuff and somehow
ended up with the error output below. A step that occurred before this
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:16:33AM -0400, Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
I am using Debian Linux, Woody.
I am trying to install gs-common and I had to use
apt-get -f install
This is what I get:
Unpacking gs-common ( from gs-common )
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/ (--unpacking)
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
