Re: Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-26 Thread Lisi
On Monday 25 April 2011 16:25:40 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Definitely a sarcastic example; to accompany my remark about the computer being a sorcerer's apprentice for most users. Sorry, Peter - I always did take things too literally. The first French I learnt was Vous prenez les choses au

Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-25 Thread peasthope
Camaleon Lisi, From: Camaleon noela...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:01:58 + (UTC) I took the above just as a sarcastic example... Definitely a sarcastic example; to accompany my remark about the computer being a sorcerer's apprentice for most users. At a social event such as

Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread peasthope
From: Camaleon noela...@gmail.com Subject:Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice No, indeed. To avoid that tell (instruct) Mr. Doe to deliver a PDF document instead and problem solved ;-) Or send an email containing a message of about 82 ASCII characters. For most

Re: Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:05:34 -0800, peasthope wrote: From: Camaleon Subject: Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice No, indeed. To avoid that tell (instruct) Mr. Doe to deliver a PDF document instead and problem solved ;-) Or send an email containing a message of about

Re: Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Greg Madden
On Sunday 24 April 2011 09:05:34 am peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: I get that. But the function of a browser is to interpret a text in an XML language, into a form for input to a human. I just don't see how to make Iceweasel recognize the structure of this document. The style is there but