Steve Lamb a écrit :
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If not,
you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to
Lionel VICTOR wrote:
Now I'm speaking theoretically 'cos I've never needed to try this out
but...
SSH can compress data. So, as the CPU is not the problem (i.e.:
[SNIP]
Well given that, the difference between theory and practice is that
practice works... theoretically.
As any gamer knows
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:32:40PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home.
Yup. If every
Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the things that broke...
If you can get access to the box or walk someone through access on the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:41:44PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get
upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen.
Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the things that broke...
If
on Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:38:22AM -0300, Cristian Gutierrez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to know if I could
provide support for there small network of PC's at home. I have been reading about
VNC and wondered about its security and speed. I went to tightvnc and see info about
using SSH as well. Anyone using a setup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home. I have been reading about VNC and wondered about its security
and speed. I went to tightvnc and see info about using SSH as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home.
Yup. If every other system you're
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
home.
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:45:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about remote access. One of my co-workers wants to
know if I could provide support for there small network of PC's at
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If not,
you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
my X desktop because X was slower than VNC. I can't imagine SSH+X would be
faster than VNC. :P
What are
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Yup. If every other system you're supporting is Linux, then SSH is
all you need (and it's X11 forwarding option is your friend). If
not, you'll have to go with the much slower, much more insecure VNC.
Much
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:46:34PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Much slower? Erm on the LAN I've switched to using VNC for access to
my X desktop because X was slower than VNC. I can't imagine SSH+X would be
faster than VNC. :P
What are you doing to it that X is slower
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
just-take-a-jpeg-of-the-screen-and-cram-it-over-the-network-oriented.
What are you doing that is
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
just-take-a-jpeg-of-the-screen-and-cram-it-over-the-network-oriented.
Unfortunately as of a few months ago anything built on
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking in the
middle. Be sure
-Original Message-
From: Roberto Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Remote access PC support
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always
Joshua Ferraro wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH. It's what
I do for those unfortunate times I stuck on a windows machine
(since the VNC viewer and PuTTY are monolithic executables that
don't require administrative privileges to install).
Could you expand on how exactly
on Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:10:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Running applications.
That shouldn't make it slow, X is window-oriented, instead of
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:39:21PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
You can always tunnel the VNC connection through SSH.
And make already sloth VNC more like sitting through all 3 hours of
Titanic: Slow and painful with lots of high-pitched shrieking
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:46:38PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I've worked with VNC and several other technologies (radmin, WTS, and
another which fails to come to mind...). For intermittent support work,
they are acceptable. Wouldn't want to work on 'em full time though.
I'm working on a
24 matches
Mail list logo
