-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 18:10, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
IMHO you should at least quote him with the proper context.
(E.g.: his clarifications in some messages that followed).
IMHO his clarifications just confirm that *IMHO* he takes the decision
to remove
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 01:11 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
- Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:14:03
Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 01:11 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
- Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:19 +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
SNIP
I'm just an average Testing user, have been for a while, and around me
almost every Debian users I know are using Testing, mostly because it's
the Debian's flavour which can compare with other
Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:19 +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
SNIP
I'm just an average Testing user, have been for a while, and around me
almost every Debian users I know are using Testing, mostly because it's
the
Testing is the right choice for me, and if it no longer is I would move
to another distro immediately. Etch doesn't even install on many recent
machines.
I too am just a regular user. I have been using sidux and found it to be
sound os and have just put Debian testing on my laptop a few
On 05/06/2008, thveillon.debian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing
[snip]
has always been at least as reliable as Ubuntu.
That's not saying much. ;-)
But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
live with bugs, then use testing. If you don't like bugs, then run
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:28 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 05/06/2008, thveillon.debian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing
[snip]
has always been at least as reliable as Ubuntu.
That's not saying much. ;-)
But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:21 +0100, Jamie Griffin wrote:
Testing is the right choice for me, and if it no longer is I would move
to another distro immediately. Etch doesn't even install on many recent
machines.
I too am just a regular user. I have been using sidux and found it to be
Am 2008-06-04 10:02:13, schrieb Patrick Wiseman:
So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
How can this be with the perl 5.10 transition?
The half of my system was down even by upgrading every day...
I'm sure there is some documentation i read on this, but as the testing release
has been brought up,
thought i'd take advantage of the knowledge from you guys who have been using
it a lot.
On sidux running Debian sid, it was recommended to do a 'apt-get dist-upgrade'
regularly (ie, every few
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:50 +0100, Jamie Griffin wrote:
I'm sure there is some documentation i read on this, but as the testing
release has been brought up,
thought i'd take advantage of the knowledge from you guys who have been using
it a lot.
On sidux running Debian sid,
I don't
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso a écrit :
On 05/06/2008, thveillon.debian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing
[snip]
has always been at least as reliable as Ubuntu.
That's not saying much. ;-)
But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
live with bugs, then
I don't know how you are running Sidux AND Debian Sid.
Apologies, wan't too clear. The distro called sidux; its core system is Debian
sid (as far as i understand)
On Sid, I run apt-get upgrade about twice a week, read the output of
apt-listbugs and then do the same for dist-upgrade.
Will
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:28:40AM -0500, Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
live with bugs, then use testing. If you don't like bugs, then run
stable.
One of my hobbies is translating English into English.
The above
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:22:53PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:28:40AM -0500, Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
live with bugs, then use testing. If you don't like bugs, then run
stable.
One
thveillon.debian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So please don't break my system to often/badly is what I meant, and of
course keep making Debian the best os ever ;-)
Welcome aboard. FYI, when Etch went stable there were posts in here
along the lines of, I just did a dist-upgrade, and it ran cleanly.
- Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:14:03 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#484129:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Chris Bannister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Jun
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:02:13AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
Sometimes (rarely) things break, but that's something I prefer to
live with so that I can
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:02:13AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
Sometimes (rarely) things break, but that's something I prefer to
live
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This may be more interesting [1]:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
[...]
No it's not. The principal goal of testing is to evaluate what
would be our next stable if we tried to release *RIGHT NOW*.
Packages with RC bugs cannot be part of a release, so must
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 06:05:49PM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This may be more interesting [1]:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
[...]
No it's not. The principal goal of testing is to evaluate what
would be our next stable if we tried to
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:48:57AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:02:13AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
Sometimes (rarely) things
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:19:33PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I wrote:
And in fact, for (using a number I just pulled out of thin air) 90% of the
time I've been using Debian, going back to Slink, Stable has been so
obsolete as to be hard to use for anything but some servers.
Huh?
25 matches
Mail list logo
