sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do you have anything in your kernel logs that looks like:
... Error EERPOM read ...
? i remember a fellow on another list i'm on had a problem with
his sis900 card too, it was a bad eeprom that returned bogus values.
I am not the guy you talk about,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:47:51 +0100
Robert Epprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do you have anything in your kernel logs that looks like:
... Error EERPOM read ...
? i remember a fellow on another list i'm on had a problem with
his sis900 card
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:47:51PM +0100, Robert Epprecht wrote:
I am not the guy you talk about, but with kernel 2.4.18 dmesg said:
sis900.c: v1.08.02 11/30/2001
eth0: Error EERPOM read
I was told, that the reason was the driver not able to read the mac address
on the card. I had to
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:47:51PM +0100, Robert Epprecht wrote:
with kernel 2.4.18 dmesg said:
sis900.c: v1.08.02 11/30/2001
eth0: Error EERPOM read
yeah, that's the error i was talking about. you can tell because of the
typho (should be EEPROM,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:49:21PM +0100, Robert Epprecht wrote:
yeah, that's the error i was talking about. you can tell because of the
typho (should be EEPROM, not EERPROM). do you still get that message?
no
good, maybe it's already fixed in upstream then...
I could try starting the
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:06:06PM +0100, Michael Bona wrote:
Sorry, I am confused: Detection with DHCP fails - I can confirm that ;-(
Then what do you do to make the detection work fine?
do you have anything in your kernel logs that looks like:
... Error EERPOM read ...
? i remember a
Klaus Imgrund wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:19:09 +0100
Michael Bona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Klaus,
so did you find a pattern under what circumstances it works and when
it does not? I would be very interested especially concerning Debian
...
Michael
When you just hit 'enter' and
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:06:06 +0100
Michael Bona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Klaus Imgrund wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:19:09 +0100
Michael Bona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Klaus,
so did you find a pattern under what circumstances it works and
when it does not? I would be very
8 matches
Mail list logo