On 08/04/2014 05:54, Gary Dale wrote:
On 07/04/14 03:48 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I have a server which uses RAID10 made of 4 partitions for / and boots
from it. It looks like so:
mdadm -D /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
Version : 00.90
Creation Time : Mon Apr 27 09:25:05 2009
Raid Level : raid10
Gary Dale garyd...@velcom.ca ha scritto nel messaggio
news:53437300.8020...@velcom.ca
IMHO this is a bad setup. Because you are reading and writing to
multiple disks at at time, you may have some speed-up, but you only
get half the total space. And you are vulnerable to some two-disk
On 08/04/14 08:54 AM, Valerio Vanni wrote:
Gary Dale garyd...@velcom.ca ha scritto nel messaggio
news:53437300.8020...@velcom.ca
IMHO this is a bad setup. Because you are reading and writing to
multiple disks at at time, you may have some speed-up, but you only
get half the total space. And
Hi All.
I have a server which uses RAID10 made of 4 partitions for / and boots from
it. It looks like so:
mdadm -D /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
Version : 00.90
Creation Time : Mon Apr 27 09:25:05 2009
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 973827968 (928.71 GiB 997.20 GB)
Used Dev Size :
On 07/04/14 03:48 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I have a server which uses RAID10 made of 4 partitions for / and boots
from it. It looks like so:
mdadm -D /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
Version : 00.90
Creation Time : Mon Apr 27 09:25:05 2009
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 973827968 (928.71 GiB
5 matches
Mail list logo