Hi List!
I installed a software raid, level1 with 3 disks, one of them is a spare.
I have 2 partitions:
md0 is for / and is made of sda1,sdb1, sdc1
md1 is for swap and made of sda2,sdb2, sdc2
- I can boot form both disks,
- the system works fine.
- mdstat says the raids are active
- mdmadm
Le Monday 20 April 2009 11:44:31 BAGI Akos, vous avez écrit :
Hi List!
I installed a software raid, level1 with 3 disks, one of them is a spare.
I have 2 partitions:
md0 is for / and is made of sda1,sdb1, sdc1
md1 is for swap and made of sda2,sdb2, sdc2
- I can boot form both disks,
-
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, BAGI Akos wrote:
Hi List!
I installed a software raid, level1 with 3 disks, one of them is a spare.
I have 2 partitions:
md0 is for / and is made of sda1,sdb1, sdc1
md1 is for swap and made of sda2,sdb2, sdc2
There is no particularly good reason to
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:29:00PM +0300, Michael Iatrou wrote:
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, BAGI Akos wrote:
Hi List!
I installed a software raid, level1 with 3 disks, one of them is a spare.
I have 2 partitions:
md0 is for / and is made of sda1,sdb1, sdc1
md1 is for
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:29:00PM +0300, Michael Iatrou wrote:
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, BAGI Akos wrote:
Hi List!
I installed a software raid, level1 with 3 disks, one of them is a
spare.
I have 2
Michael,
2009/4/20 Michael Iatrou m.iat...@freemail.gr
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:29:00PM +0300, Michael Iatrou wrote:
There is no particularly good reason to have the swap on RAID. You
should define three independed swap
Michael Iatrou wrote:
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:29:00PM +0300, Michael Iatrou wrote:
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, BAGI Akos wrote:
Hi List!
I installed a software raid, level1 with 3 disks, one of them is a
spare.
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, Sam Kuper wrote:
Michael,
2009/4/20 Michael Iatrou m.iat...@freemail.gr
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:29:00PM +0300, Michael Iatrou wrote:
There is no particularly good reason to have
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:08:22PM +0300, Michael Iatrou wrote:
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, Sam Kuper wrote:
Michael,
[snip]
I don't think there is a silver bullet for this.
There is a performance penalty related to soft-RAID. Also swappiness
configuration must be
2009/4/21 Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:08:22PM +0300, Michael Iatrou wrote:
When the date was Monday 20 April 2009, Sam Kuper wrote:
Michael,
[snip]
I don't think there is a silver bullet for this.
There is a performance penalty related to soft-RAID. Also
2009/4/21 Sam Kuper sam.ku...@uclmail.net:
Apologies for hijacking Bagi's thread!
s/Bagi/Akos/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
