On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:22:09PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:35:52AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I used gvim, but kate and gedit and even leafpad and others are more
comfortable. IIRC common
On Mi, 29 aug 12, 01:31:03, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
PS: It seems to be, that it's possible to play this game without
paying for it, but I can't see anything that teaches me how to use vim.
Just because you don't see it, it doesn't mean it's not there.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 10:47 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 29 aug 12, 01:31:03, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
PS: It seems to be, that it's possible to play this game without
paying for it, but I can't see anything that teaches me how to use vim.
Just because you don't see it, it doesn't
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:35:52AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I used gvim, but kate and gedit and even leafpad and others are more
comfortable. IIRC common shortcuts didn't work with gvim, the only
difference to vi(m) was,
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 13:22 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:35:52AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I used gvim, but kate and gedit and even leafpad and others are more
comfortable. IIRC common shortcuts
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 00:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 13:22 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:35:52AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I used gvim, but kate and gedit and even leafpad
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I used gvim, but kate and gedit and even leafpad and others are more
comfortable. IIRC common shortcuts didn't work with gvim, the only
difference to vi(m) was, that I didn't need to know all the commands by
heart.
The trick to
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 03:35 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I used gvim, but kate and gedit and even leafpad and others are more
comfortable. IIRC common shortcuts didn't work with gvim, the only
difference to vi(m) was, that I
After 72 signs my MUA does an automatic line wrap.
When I receive mails from the list and I do reply, sometimes the quotes
are bad. I experienced the same with mails from a friend and he told me
that it takes 78 signs for him.
Is there a standard for how many signs it should take to do an
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:46:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
After 72 signs my MUA does an automatic line wrap.
And your MUA is...
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4
When I receive mails from the list and I do reply, sometimes the quotes
are bad.
This can be normal.
I, for instance, use to force
Hi Camaleón :)
yes, I'm using Evolution, but if I quote from GUI mailers such as
Evolution, Thunderbird or OTOH from text based mailers such as Mutt and
Wanderlust, the quotes usually look okay, quoting the friends Alpine or
your Pan looks disgusting.
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 13:48 +, Camaleón
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:37:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi Camaleón :)
yes, I'm using Evolution, but if I quote from GUI mailers such as
Evolution, Thunderbird or OTOH from text based mailers such as Mutt and
Wanderlust, the quotes usually look okay, quoting the friends Alpine or
your Pan
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 15:07 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:37:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi Camaleón :)
yes, I'm using Evolution, but if I quote from GUI mailers such as
Evolution, Thunderbird or OTOH from text based mailers such as Mutt and
Wanderlust, the quotes
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:51:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 15:07 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
This line is ok, just the quoted text is borked.
Well, I can see something wrong in your quotes. Have you tried to reply
to my post from Thunderbird?
No. I wonder what's
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 16:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:51:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 15:07 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
This line is ok, just the quoted text is borked.
Well, I can see something wrong in your quotes. Have you tried to
On Sb, 25 aug 12, 16:37:57, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Yes, but I won't call Gedit light weight. I'm thinking of something
like Leafpad. FWIW I won't use vi(m), nano, emacs etc., it should be a
GUI editor.
gvim ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
On Sb, 25 aug 12, 14:46:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
After 72 signs my MUA does an automatic line wrap.
When I receive mails from the list and I do reply, sometimes the quotes
are bad. I experienced the same with mails from a friend and he told me
that it takes 78 signs for him.
Is there a
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 20:41 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 25 aug 12, 16:37:57, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Yes, but I won't call Gedit light weight. I'm thinking of something
like Leafpad. FWIW I won't use vi(m), nano, emacs etc., it should be a
GUI editor.
gvim ;)
I used gvim, but
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 20:44 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 25 aug 12, 14:46:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
After 72 signs my MUA does an automatic line wrap.
When I receive mails from the list and I do reply, sometimes the quotes
are bad. I experienced the same with mails from a friend and he
On 25/08/12 20:37, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 20:44 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 25 aug 12, 14:46:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
After 72 signs my MUA does an automatic line wrap.
When I receive mails from the list and I do reply, sometimes the quotes
are bad. I experienced the
Erwan David wrote:
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
- Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line
with a carriage return.
but 72 is a common value used by several established editors (like
(g)vim).
I wonder if
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:33:02PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Evolution does provide those options for HTML and plain text and it has
got impact to plain text mails.
This should become a never ending line, because I switched to preformatted.
Usually this would cause lines that force the
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 02:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 20:17 -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:33:02PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Evolution does provide those options for HTML and plain text and it has
got impact to plain text mails.
This
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 20:17 -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:33:02PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Evolution does provide those options for HTML and plain text and it has
got impact to plain text mails.
This should become a never ending line, because I switched to
24 matches
Mail list logo
