Hi,
I have only one computer (working anyway), which I
use for fairly important information. So, I use
the stable Debian distribution on it.
However, I also do development on this machine, so
I often need later versions of libraries and so
on that I'm using in my projects. If I could just
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In many cases these seem to be frivolous assumptions.
It seems very implausible to me (for example)
that compiling libsdl1.1 _really_ requires
libc6 = 2.1.97. I'm pretty sure that, installing
from source, libc6 version 2.1.3 (in Debian 2.2)
will
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:06:08PM -0800, Terry Hancock wrote:
The reason is that the unstable packages seem to
have the assumption built into them that they
will never be used on a stable distr system --
that is they have dependencies on later versions
of basic packages.
This has
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason is that the unstable packages seem to have the assumption
built into them that they will never be used on a stable distr system
-- that is they have dependencies on later versions of basic packages.
Consider this for a moment; how should unstable
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:06:08PM -0800, Terry Hancock wrote:
The reason is that the unstable packages seem to have the assumption
built into them that they will never be used on a stable distr system
-- that is they have dependencies on later versions of
5 matches
Mail list logo
