[SOLVED] Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

to work around put the following line in your mutt profile unset smtp_authenticators songbird

Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 05:58:31PM -0400, songbird wrote: Greg Wooledge wrote: Also, bugs should be reported to bugs.debian.org, not here. an FYI to fellow users can be helpful. That may be true, but even in that case you should describe the issue you've hit. -- Please do not CC me for

Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

Greg Wooledge wrote: ... > The only difference between package versions 2.2.3-1 and 2.2.3-2 is > the patch set that Debian applies. ok, thanks, i filed a bug report. songbird

Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 05:58:31PM -0400, songbird wrote: > > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:23:58AM -0400, songbird wrote: > >> 2.2.3-1 version works > >> 2.2.3-2 version does not work > > > > This isn't a useful bug report until you say *how* version 2.2.3-2 fails. > > mutt doesn't send mail.

Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:23:58AM -0400, songbird wrote: >> >> 2.2.3-1 version works >> 2.2.3-2 version does not work > > This isn't a useful bug report until you say *how* version 2.2.3-2 fails. mutt doesn't send mail. > Also, bugs should be reported to

Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:23:58AM -0400, songbird wrote: > > 2.2.3-1 version works > 2.2.3-2 version does not work This isn't a useful bug report until you say *how* version 2.2.3-2 fails. Also, bugs should be reported to bugs.debian.org, not here.

mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

2.2.3-1 version works 2.2.3-2 version does not work songbird

Re: upgrade to testing

On 6/16/21 7:39 AM, Wil wrote: > (...) I will change the sources.list to use > "bullseye" and then run "apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade; apt-get autoremove > ; > apt-get dist-upgrade ; apt-get autoremove". After doing so the system will be > on current Debian testing and it will become Debian

Re: upgrade to testing

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:47:21AM +0800, Robbi Nespu wrote: > On 6/16/21 1:56 AM, Gary Dale wrote: > >     sed -i -s 's/buster/bullseye/g' /etc/apt/sources.list > > I like this way, it easier and i don't need to open file and change it > manually. Yeah, it's wonderfully concise. Too bad it's

Re: upgrade to testing

On 6/15/2021 8:10 PM, Henning Follmann wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:50:05PM +0200, john doe wrote: On 6/15/2021 7:26 PM, Wil wrote: How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? By following the instructions available on the Debian web site (1)! In a nutshell, change

Re: upgrade to testing

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:03:20PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:26:29PM +, Wil wrote: How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? Hi Wil, Don't - at least not directly. If your /etc/apt/sources.list says "stable" anywhere in it, you probably want

Re: upgrade to testing

On 6/16/21 1:56 AM, Gary Dale wrote: On 2021-06-15 13:26, Wil wrote: How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? It's not really an upgrade. It's more a switch in priorities. However to answer your question directly, as root do either     sed -i -s 's/buster/bullseye/g'

Re: upgrade to testing

On 2021-06-15 13:26, Wil wrote: How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? It's not really an upgrade. It's more a switch in priorities. However to answer your question directly, as root do either     sed -i -s 's/buster/bullseye/g' /etc/apt/sources.list or     sed -i -s

Re: upgrade to testing

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:20:09PM -0400, Paul M. Foster wrote: > A lot of the people here don't have to look up the answer; > they know it already. And as demonstrated, the answer isn't that difficult > to express. At least two people have given a *wrong* answer in this thread.

Re: upgrade to testing

On 6/15/21 6:08 PM, Francisco M Neto wrote: Honestly worth a lot more. There are a lot of people that are not that familiar with Debian, and sometimes it's comprehensible that they don't look for search engines right away; a lot of times the answers that come up on a search apply to

Re: upgrade to testing

Hey there, I don't want to just add a meme here, but someone give this man a medal. On 2021-06-15 18:03, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > If you want to update to what is _currently_ Debian testing - now is a > relatively safe time to do so because it's in a state of freeze before it > is

Re: upgrade to testing

On Tue 15 Jun 2021 at 17:26:29 +, Wil wrote: > How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? Surely you are pulling out legs? You are well aware of the file /etc/apt/sources.list ? Maybe you have something else in mind apart from a ome sentence throwout? Hoping to hear from

Re: upgrade to testing

> > On 6/15/2021 7:26 PM, Wil wrote: > > > How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/releasenotes https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBullseye https://wiki.debian.org/NewInBullseye

Re: upgrade to testing

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:50:05PM +0200, john doe wrote: > On 6/15/2021 7:26 PM, Wil wrote: > > How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? > > By following the instructions available on the Debian web site (1)! > > In a nutshell, change 'buster/stable' to 'bullseye/unstable' in >

Re: upgrade to testing

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:26:29PM +, Wil wrote: > How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? Hi Wil, Don't - at least not directly. If your /etc/apt/sources.list says "stable" anywhere in it, you probably want to change that to reference "buster" today, anyway. Bullseye -

Re: upgrade to testing

On 6/15/2021 7:26 PM, Wil wrote: How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? By following the instructions available on the Debian web site (1)! In a nutshell, change 'buster/stable' to 'bullseye/unstable' in /etc/apt/sources.list'.: $ apt-get update && apt-get full-upgrade Note

Re: upgrade to testing

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:26:29 + Wil wrote: > How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? The first thing I'd do is some searching on the Internet. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=debian+upgrade+stable+testing=vivaldi=web -- Does anybody read signatures any more? ht

upgrade to testing

How do I upgrade from Debian stable to Debain testing? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Audio broken on Lenovo ThinkPad T14 by recent upgrade on testing

On Lu, 04 ian 21, 21:57:20, Patrick Elsen wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm not sure if this is the right way or place to report this, but I've > been running Debian bullseye (Testing) for some months now and it's > been a really great experience, everything works out of the box > (backlight, suspend,

Re: Audio broken on Lenovo ThinkPad T14 by recent upgrade on testing

Patrick Elsen writes: > Hey all, > > I'm not sure if this is the right way or place to report this, but I've > been running Debian bullseye (Testing) for some months now and it's > been a really great experience, everything works out of the box > (backlight, suspend, display brightness control,

Audio broken on Lenovo ThinkPad T14 by recent upgrade on testing

Hey all, I'm not sure if this is the right way or place to report this, but I've been running Debian bullseye (Testing) for some months now and it's been a really great experience, everything works out of the box (backlight, suspend, display brightness control, switching between speakers and

Re: Best/Proper way to dist-upgrade Debian Testing except the kernel?

On Lu, 09 dec 19, 20:27:28, riveravaldez wrote: > > Just to clarify: How long one could go on upgrading debian-testing > (kernel included) without rebooting? As long as it is acceptable for you to run the system with known security flaws. Kind regards, Andrei --

Re: Best/Proper way to dist-upgrade Debian Testing except the kernel?

riveravaldez wrote: ... > Hi, thanks a lot for the answers/info. > > Just to clarify: How long one could go on upgrading debian-testing > (kernel included) without rebooting? why would you not want to reboot? if you aren't going to use the upgrades why are you making them? if you think there

Re: Best/Proper way to dist-upgrade Debian Testing except the kernel?

On 12/4/19, songbird wrote: > Sven Hartge wrote: >> riveravaldez wrote: >> >>> Because updating the kernel requires to reboot the system -AFAIK- in >>> many cases I would prefer to 'dist-upgrade' (all packages) except the >>> kernel -until a moment in which I can reboot the system-, so: >> >>>

Re: Best/Proper way to dist-upgrade Debian Testing except the kernel?

Sven Hartge wrote: > riveravaldez wrote: > >> Because updating the kernel requires to reboot the system -AFAIK- in >> many cases I would prefer to 'dist-upgrade' (all packages) except the >> kernel -until a moment in which I can reboot the system-, so: > >> 1. Is this something

Re: Best/Proper way to dist-upgrade Debian Testing except the kernel?

riveravaldez wrote: > Because updating the kernel requires to reboot the system -AFAIK- in > many cases I would prefer to 'dist-upgrade' (all packages) except the > kernel -until a moment in which I can reboot the system-, so: > 1. Is this something right/viable/acceptable to do? You don't

Best/Proper way to dist-upgrade Debian Testing except the kernel?

Because updating the kernel requires to reboot the system -AFAIK- in many cases I would prefer to 'dist-upgrade' (all packages) except the kernel -until a moment in which I can reboot the system-, so: 1. Is this something right/viable/acceptable to do? 2. Which would be the best/proper way to do

Re: Plasma and qt apps broken after upgrade in Testing

On 10/17/2017 03:14 AM, devfra wrote: Hi list I upgraded Testing this morning and now Plasma 5 and all the qt applications are broken. Sddm does not work, it just shows me a black screen and the mouse cursor. I am also unable to start Plasma with another display manager (lightdm in my

Re: Upgrade de testing

Bonjour, Oui, j'ai pu faire la transition mais avec quelques paquets qui, jusqu'à maintenant, restent non installables. J'ai noté : easytag-nautilus, filezilla, gimp (et paquets associés), gnome (métapaquet seulement), gnome-photos, goplay, icedove-l10n-fr, iceowl-l10n-fr,

Re: Upgrade de testing

Salut, Je me demande comment tu as fait. Moi il veut m'enlever 87 paquets dont des logiciels importants comme The Gimp, filezilla, gnome-photos, etc. A+ Gaëtan Le Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:31:26 +0200 Pierre Crescenzo a écrit: > Bonjour, > > Je m'y suis mis sérieusement

Re: Upgrade de testing

Bonjour, Je m'y suis mis sérieusement hier et, au prix de l'abandon (temporaire :-)) de quelques paquets importants par encore prêts ("gnome" mais seulement le métapaquet, "filezilla"...), ça passe désormais bien. J'ai agis peu à peu avec synaptic, en lisant bien la liste de ce qu'il enlevait.

Re : Upgrade de testing

Le 13/09/2015 10:30:20, Franck Delage a écrit : > Effectivement; je viens de faire avec apt-get, et visiblement pas de > problème ! Chez moi, apt-get vire autant de paquets qu’il en met à jour. nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial -- RÉALISME M : Qu'est-ce qu'il nous faudrait pour qu'on nous

Re: Upgrade de testing

Effectivement; je viens de faire avec apt-get, et visiblement pas de problème ! Merci à tous. D'une manière générale, vous conseillez plutôt apt-get alors ? Je ne connais pas vraiment la différence entre les deux, à vrai dire. Bon dimanche à tous et encore merci. Franck. Le sam. 12 sept. 2015

Re: Re : Upgrade de testing

Le Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:11:36 +0200 nicolas.patr...@gmail.com a écrit: > Le 13/09/2015 10:30:20, Franck Delage a écrit : > > > Effectivement; je viens de faire avec apt-get, et visiblement pas de > > problème ! > > Chez moi, apt-get vire autant de paquets qu’il en met à jour. > Chez moi aussi

Re: Upgrade de testing

Sun, 13 Sep 2015 08:30:20 + Franck Delage écrivait : > Effectivement; je viens de faire avec apt-get, et visiblement pas de > problème ! Je ne suis pas sûr mais je pense que la solution vient plutôt du fait que les problèmes ont trouvé solution à la source, que les

Re: Upgrade de testing

Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:40:42 +0200 MENGUAL Jean-Philippe écrivait : > Bonjour, > > Oui la migration GCC a beaucoup déstabilisé la testing. Du reste il > était recommandé, dans ce contexte, de ne pas utiliser aptitude. Effectivement. Cela fait une bonne semaine que je

Upgrade de testing

Bonjour à tous, Quelqu'un a-t-il réussi à être à jour en Testing aujourd'hui ? Cela fait des jours que je suis bloqué par une résolution des dépendances interminable... Aujourd'hui petite amélioration, avec l'option --full-resolver, aptitude me propose une solution, mais qui ne met pas grand

Re: Upgrade de testing

Bonjour, Oui la migration GCC a beaucoup déstabilisé la testing. Du reste il était recommandé, dans ce contexte, de ne pas utiliser aptitude. Pas trop de pb pour moi pour le moment, à 2 petits paquets près. En fait la testing se met à jour plus lentement que l'instable, puisque les

Re: Issues with gnome3 after upgrade to testing

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote: On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 23:10 +1100, Daniel Dalton wrote: Upon resume though the virtual consoles seem to work fine, but gnome just locks up and I can do nothing with the desktop. As I'm blind and the

Issues with gnome3 after upgrade to testing

Hi, I'm experiencing two annoying issues with gnome3 after upgrading from wheezy to testing. 1. When I suspend my computer by clicking in the top pannel under my user name, suspend, the computer will suspend as expected. Upon resume though the virtual consoles seem to work fine, but gnome just

Re: Issues with gnome3 after upgrade to testing

On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 23:10 +1100, Daniel Dalton wrote: Upon resume though the virtual consoles seem to work fine, but gnome just locks up and I can do nothing with the desktop. As I'm blind and the screenreader stops working at this point I can not read if there is any error message on

Subversion disappeared from apache after upgrade in testing?

Hi, yesterday I did upgrade of Debian testing (apt-get update; apt-get upgrade). Afterwards - my svn server stopped working. Apparently libapache2-svn is missing. I did some search, and found http://serverfault.com/questions/513399/debian-after-upgrade-apache-to-2-4-4-libapache2-svn-wont-work

Re: Subversion disappeared from apache after upgrade in testing?

hubert depesz lubaczewski: Anyway - the questions are: 1. will libapache2-svn be back in some time? 2. if not, how can I get to my repo data now? You can start svnserve for your repository and switch --relocate your working copies to the new (svn://) URL. J. -- I am not scared of death but

Re: Subversion disappeared from apache after upgrade in testing?

On 2013-09-11 14:11:35 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: hubert depesz lubaczewski: Anyway - the questions are: 1. will libapache2-svn be back in some time? It seems that there is a patch somewhere. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712004 for more information. 2. if

upgrade to testing, problems with new kernels initrd

I am upgrading to testing, it does not boot. I have a striped md softraid, which is encrypted with dm crypt, which is broken into logical volumes for root home and swap. It does not get to the crypto, and tries to do the volume group first. It hangs at cryptsetup: evsm_activate is not available.

Upgrade stable - testing -- with errors

I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable (lenny atm) and I wanted to get it to testing. Its running trinity as well. So I updated the apt-conf to APT::Default-Release testing; (My base sources.list includes links for

Re: Upgrade stable - testing -- with errors

On 2011-02-02 18:42 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote: I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable (lenny atm) and I wanted to get it to testing. Its running trinity as well. So I updated the apt-conf to

Re: Upgrade stable - testing -- with errors

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote: On 2011-02-02 18:42 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote: I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable (lenny atm) and I wanted to get it to testing. Its

Re: Upgrade stable - testing -- with errors

On 2011-02-02 19:21 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote: On 2011-02-02 18:42 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote: I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable

Re: Upgrade stable - testing -- with errors

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote: Well, this might actually be your problem, try downgrading to 4.4.5-8 from Squeeze.  Apparently the experimental libstdc++6 version does not work with Lenny's glibcš. That worked to get me moving forward again. I had to

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 06/04/2010 05:56 PM, Mitchell Laks wrote: On 20:17 Fri 04 Jun , Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-04 20:09 +0200, Mitchell Laks wrote: another option is to ban the entire new nouveau driver from your system which should restore some sanity. Except that kent got a black

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

another option is to ban the entire new nouveau driver from your system which should restore some sanity. it will get rid of the framebuffer use/ here is one thing to try. add the following line to the file /etc/modpobe.d/blacklist.conf blacklist nouveau then reboot. that is what i did.

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 2010-06-04 20:09 +0200, Mitchell Laks wrote: another option is to ban the entire new nouveau driver from your system which should restore some sanity. Except that kent got a black display without it. it will get rid of the framebuffer use/ here is one thing to try. add the following

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 20:17 Fri 04 Jun , Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-04 20:09 +0200, Mitchell Laks wrote: another option is to ban the entire new nouveau driver from your system which should restore some sanity. Except that kent got a black display without it. it will get rid of the framebuffer

dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

I've been running stable for the past half-year, but because I couldn't get my printer to work with the hplij in stable, decided to dist-upgrade to testing which has a version that supports my printer. But when I dist-upgraded, my dual-monitor setup freezes my computer. If I remove my /etc

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 06/03/2010 12:01 PM, Kent West wrote: I've been running stable for the past half-year, but because I couldn't get my printer to work with the hplij in stable, decided to dist-upgrade to testing which has a version that supports my printer. But when I dist-upgraded, my dual-monitor setup

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 2010-06-03 21:06 +0200, Kent West wrote: On 06/03/2010 12:01 PM, Kent West wrote: I've been running stable for the past half-year, but because I couldn't get my printer to work with the hplij in stable, decided to dist-upgrade to testing which has a version that supports my printer

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 06/03/2010 02:35 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-03 21:06 +0200, Kent West wrote: So I figured I'd push on to Sid/unstable, to see if maybe I'd get newer drivers that might solve this issue. How interesting.! Now when I reboot (into the newly installed 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 2010-06-03 22:06 +0200, Kent West wrote: On 06/03/2010 02:35 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: You may try booting with the video=… option, e.g. video=1280x1024 or whatever your monitor's resolution is. Where would I put this line? Append it to the kernel command line. I don't use grub2, so I

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 06/03/2010 03:25 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-03 22:06 +0200, Kent West wrote: On 06/03/2010 02:35 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: You may try booting with the video=… option, e.g. video=1280x1024 or whatever your monitor's resolution is. Where would I put this line?

Re: dist-upgrade to testing killed dual-monitors

On 2010-06-03 22:36 +0200, Kent West wrote: In the grub screen where you select which kernel to boot, I pressed e to edit the kernel line of my choice, then went to the linux line that had things like /quiet and ro and root=UUIDblahblahblah and added video=1024x768, then pressed Ctrl-X to

gstreamer in squeeze (was: upgrade to testing (Gnome): audio playback borked)

vitaminx vitam...@callistix.net wrote: | do you have any audio managers installed? (e.g. pulseaudio, jackd, | esd) | Thank you and sorry to be slow (I was away from the relevant machine). Yes: jackd and pulseaudio are both installed; not esd, though. | can you please post the content of

upgrade to testing (Gnome): audio playback borked

After an upgrade to Debian testing this weekend (jan 23, 2010), audio playback on my desktop GNOME machine was left in a compromised state. None of the following worked following the upgrade (they worked before): VLC audacious exaile listen totem rhythmbox By `not work' here

Re: upgrade to testing (Gnome): audio playback borked

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:48:36PM -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote: After an upgrade to Debian testing this weekend (jan 23, 2010), audio playback on my desktop GNOME machine was left in a compromised state. What kernel are you using? Sound didn't work for me using 2.6.30 but worked fine

Re: upgrade to testing (Gnome): audio playback borked

* Rick Pasotto (r...@niof.net) wrote: | What kernel are you using? Sound didn't work for me using 2.6.30 but | worked fine with 2.6.26 and 2.6.32. Thank you, Rick. I'm using 2.6.32, but I don't believe it can be a kernel issue since sound actually works very well, as long as you stick to

Re: upgrade to testing (Gnome): audio playback borked

Hi, do you have any audio managers installed? (e.g. pulseaudio, jackd, esd) can you please post the content of ~/.asoundrc and /etc/asoundrc if these files exist in your installation? greetings, vitaminx Am Montag, den 25.01.2010, 08:46 -0800 schrieb Jim McCloskey: * Rick Pasotto

Re: Upgrade to testing

Try to use lenny-backports repository. I had that problem some days ago. Naumov Sergey kom...@uvt.cz пишет: Hi I have installed stable and i have to change to testing but i always get this error sysresccd:/# aptitude install mysql-server Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree

Upgrade to testing

Hi I have installed stable and i have to change to testing but i always get this error sysresccd:/# aptitude install mysql-server Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading

Re: [Xorg Mouse Acceleration is Broken in new Xorg 7.4?] Re: Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: Solution for now as I

Re: [Xorg Mouse Acceleration is Broken in new Xorg 7.4?] Re: Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

Justin Piszcz wrote: Solution for now as I need a working desktop: 1. Recover OS from backup before upgrade: 2. Pin kde* and xorg* so they are not upgraded anymore. In the future/if someone from xorg can respond-- is there a fix/way to make the semantics such that 'xset m 20/5 1' is the

Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

Hello, I have two hosts (x86_64) (x86) running and after apt-get dist-upgrade this morning, I can no longer use my keyboard/mouse on either after a reboot on both machines? Has anyone experienced anthing similar? On the x86 host it is ps2(kbd)+usb(mouse). On the x86_64 host it is

Re: Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello, I have two hosts (x86_64) (x86) running and after apt-get dist-upgrade this morning, I can no longer use my keyboard/mouse on either after a reboot on both machines? Has anyone experienced anthing similar? On the x86 host it is

Re: Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello, I have two hosts (x86_64) (x86) running and after apt-get dist-upgrade this morning, I can no longer use my keyboard/mouse on either after a reboot on both machines? Has anyone experienced

[Xorg Mouse Acceleration is Broken in new Xorg 7.4?] Re: Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello, I have two hosts (x86_64) (x86) running and after apt-get dist-upgrade this morning, I can no longer use my keyboard/mouse on either after a reboot on

Re: [Xorg Mouse Acceleration is Broken in new Xorg 7.4?] Re: Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello, I have two hosts (x86_64) (x86) running and after apt-get dist-upgrade this morning, I can no longer use my

Re: [Xorg Mouse Acceleration is Broken in new Xorg 7.4?] Re: Mouse/keyboard no longer work after apt-get dist-upgrade in testing?

On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello, I have two hosts (x86_64) (x86) running and after apt-get

upgrade de testing kde4

Hola, que pasos tengo que seguir para hacer un upgrade de testing? obtengo el siguiente error: # aptitude safe-upgrade Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando árbol de dependencias Leyendo la información de estado... Hecho Leyendo la información de estado extendido Inicializando el estado de

Re: upgrade de testing kde4

On Martes 14 Julio 2009 11:08:22 aux escribió: Hola, que pasos tengo que seguir para hacer un upgrade de testing? obtengo el siguiente error: # apt-get dist-upgrade

Re: upgrade de testing kde4

On Martes 14 Julio 2009 20:52:31 JAP escribió: On Martes 14 Julio 2009 11:08:22 aux escribió: Hola, que pasos tengo que seguir para hacer un upgrade de testing? obtengo el siguiente error: # apt-get dist-upgrade Un punto escueto :=) aux: Los pasos a seguir serián cambiar /etc/apt

Upgrade to Testing Reading package lists... Error!

I am trying to upgrade an i386 system from lenny to testing and I keep running into this problem. While running: aptitude -f full-upgrade I keep getting errors like this: Reading package lists... Error! E: Malformed 2nd word in the Status line E: Error occurred while processing billard-gl

Re: Upgrade to Testing Reading package lists... Error!

Well, I am going to answer my own question on this one. I started editing the /var/lib/dpkg/status file and just saw crazy things. Instead of Package: I would see Rackage:. Instead of Status: purge ok not-installed. I would see Status: purge oj not installed:. And in some places I would

Re: Upgrade to Testing Reading package lists... Error!

Brian wrote: Looks like I am OJ now. lol, very nice. -- J -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Upgrade Debian testing to stable at Sunday

will do the installation (at 14:00 GMT) maybe Debian isn't released yet or I won't have enough time to download the ISO image. If I install Debian Testing at Saturday and then I upgrade to Stable at Sunday... will I get any kind of problem? would you suggest to install debian testing

Re: Upgrade Debian testing to stable at Sunday

suggest to install debian testing and then upgrade to stable some hours (or days) ago? Instead of putting testing or stable in your sources.list, just put lenny. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user

Re: Upgrade Debian testing to stable at Sunday

at Saturday and then I upgrade to Stable at Sunday... will I get any kind of problem? would you suggest to install debian testing and then upgrade to stable some hours (or days) ago? Instead of putting testing or stable in your sources.list, just put lenny. Yes, you're right! So, the changes between

Re: Upgrade Debian testing to stable at Sunday

kind of problem? would you suggest to install debian testing and then upgrade to stable some hours (or days) ago? If you install Lenny on Saturday and Lenny doesn't become stable by Sunday, and you still do the upgrade, you may have some problems. As stated in another e-mail your best bet

Re: Upgrade Debian testing to stable at Sunday

Testing at Saturday and then I upgrade to Stable at Sunday... will I get any kind of problem? would you suggest to install debian testing and then upgrade to stable some hours (or days) ago? If you install Lenny on Saturday and Lenny doesn't become stable by Sunday, and you still do the upgrade, you

Re: Upgrade Debian testing to stable at Sunday

On 02/12/2009 10:21 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote: [snip] Yes, you're right! So, the changes between the most recent debian testing and debian stable at Sunday will be minimal, right? Theoretically. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification --

Re: Upgrade Debian testing to stable at Sunday

On 2009-02-12_13:10:25, Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/12/2009 10:21 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote: [snip] Yes, you're right! So, the changes between the most recent debian testing and debian stable at Sunday will be minimal, right? Theoretically. OP: Earlier in this thread Ron told you to point

Re: apt upgrade to testing breaks?

On Fri,11.Jul.08, 18:26:32, Peet Grobler wrote: [...] sparky:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list # TENET mirror deb http://debian.mirror.ac.za/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http://debian.mirror.ac.za/debian/ testing main contrib non-free # Official debian repository deb

Re: apt upgrade to testing breaks?

Andrei Popescu wrote: On Fri,11.Jul.08, 18:26:32, Peet Grobler wrote: [...] sparky:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list # TENET mirror deb http://debian.mirror.ac.za/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http://debian.mirror.ac.za/debian/ testing main contrib non-free # Official debian repository

Re: apt upgrade to testing breaks?

On Sun,13.Jul.08, 13:36:19, Peet Grobler wrote: As already said, it's safer to remove third-party repos. I need wine :) I've done the upgrade though, without it - I'll add the testing repo later and try and get it back. sparky:~# apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done

Re: apt upgrade to testing breaks?

Andrei Popescu wrote: On Sun,13.Jul.08, 13:36:19, Peet Grobler wrote: You already did the upgrade, but for further reference, it is best to remove any packages not found in the official Debian repos. After the upgrade you can put them back, though some of them need to be rebuilt. That is

apt upgrade to testing breaks?

I'd like to upgrade my etch notebook to testing, simply to have newer packages available. This machine is not visible on the internet, and I'm the only user, so security is not such a huge issue. Attempting to do this though - apt says it'll uninstall certain packages (which I use!) I'm not sure

Re: apt upgrade to testing breaks?

the removed packages. After you've removed WineHQ and swiftfox from sources.list, do apt-get update. You should then be able to go into aptitude and find the non-Debian packages under Obsolete and locally-generated packages. Remove everything that's there. It should then be safe to upgrade

  1   2   3   >