Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
machine, and I see the scp process is still running. I've been unable to
kill it. Any
On 8/29/05, Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
machine, and I see the scp
garaged wrote:
On 8/29/05, Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
machine, and I see
Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
machine, and I see the scp process is still running. I've been unable to
kill
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Kent West wrote:
garaged wrote:
On 8/29/05, Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:48:28AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
machine, and I see
6 matches
Mail list logo