Hello Michael,
Michael Stone (2022/09/09 11:01 -0400):
> I would not recommend msmtp if you have a local mail service configured on
> the system because you then have two places to debug mail problems.
I agree it's suboptimal somehow, but as you could see others do that...
> Another possibility
Julio Herrero (2022/09/09 15:07 +0200):
> El mié, 07-09-2022 a las 22:31 +0200, Sébastien Hinderer escribió:
> > I would like to be able to
> > configure the SMTP server to use based on the address I am using in
> > the
> > > From header. For instance, if I am sending from my personal account
> >
Dear Gregor,
Many thanks for your messages!
Gregor Zattler (2022/09/08 10:24 +0200):
> there is https://github.com/xundeenergie/exim4-multiaccount,
> which worked for me, but I always felt uneasy because I did
> not grok the configuration.
I can understand the feeling, yes. Also, I had a look
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:31:37PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
I was advised to use msmtp but, although it has the feature I am looking
for, it misses two features of exim4 that I find useful: local e-mail
delivery to users' maildirs and the ability to queue emails composed while
the
El mié, 07-09-2022 a las 22:31 +0200, Sébastien Hinderer escribió:
> I would like to be able to
> configure the SMTP server to use based on the address I am using in
> the
> > From header. For instance, if I am sending from my personal account
> > then
> I'd like to use one smarthost and SMTP
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 07:10:17AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
To people who have familiarity with both postfix and exim4, is postfix really
easier (in a variety of senses) than exim4? LIke to install, setup, and use?
IMO, yes. It's also easier to find solutions to problems online,
Hi Sébastien, debian users,
* Gregor Zattler [2022-09-08; 10:24 +02]:
> In sum msmtp is configured for my single user and exim4 as a
> system wide local delivery MTA.
I forgot, this is the last part of my .msmtprc:
# use exim4 for local addresses
account exim4
host localhost
tls
On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 10:54:20 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sorry, this is a test email. Not sure how to do it "off list" (more
> explanation later, maybe)
There's a very underpublicised list called
debian-lists-test
specially designed for such tests.
Cheers,
David.
On Thursday, September 08, 2022 10:54:20 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sorry, this is a test email. Not sure how to do it "off list" (more
> explanation later, maybe)
Interesting.
Sometimes when I'm working on a reply to an email, I try to "disable" the
address so that I won't accidentally
Sorry, this is a test email. Not sure how to do it "off list" (more
explanation later, maybe)
On Thursday, September 08, 2022 01:06:07 AM Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 8/9/22 7:10 pm, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
To people who have familiarity with both postfix and exim4, is postfix
really
easier (in a variety of senses) than exim4? LIke to install, setup, and use?
I tried to set up postix back near the beginning of my Linux odyssey, maybe
sometime between
On Thursday, September 08, 2022 01:06:07 AM Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 8/9/22 12:29 pm, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:31:37PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> >> Currently I am using exim4 as mail transport agent (MTA).
...
> >> solution, although I find exim4 really big
Hi Sébastien, debian users,
* Sébastien Hinderer [2022-09-07; 22:31 +02]:
> (I am not subscribed to the list)
>
> Currently I am using exim4 as mail transport agent (MTA).
>
> I am looking for another one, because I would like to be able to
> configure the SMTP server to use based on the address
Thanks.
I indeed found a blog post describing an implementation. I can't post
the URL here, sorry, because I did'nt keep it so it looked complex to
me. I felt completely intimidated, not daring to launch myself in such
an adventure. I may try to read exim4-s documentation, but frankly if I
can
On 8/9/22 12:29 pm, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:31:37PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
Dear all,
(I am not subscribed to the list)
Currently I am using exim4 as mail transport agent (MTA).
I am looking for another one, because I would like to be able to
configure
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:31:37PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> (I am not subscribed to the list)
>
> Currently I am using exim4 as mail transport agent (MTA).
>
> I am looking for another one, because I would like to be able to
> configure the SMTP server to use based on
Dear all,
(I am not subscribed to the list)
Currently I am using exim4 as mail transport agent (MTA).
I am looking for another one, because I would like to be able to
configure the SMTP server to use based on the address I am using in the
>From header. For instance, if I am sending from my
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:05:23PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
May be 3 years ago now, but I tried various options back then, and
mpop was the fastest (really fast compared to fetchmail) which did not
have other problems for me, at that time.
Three years is a long time for a piece of
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:08:41 +0200
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
...
(BTW, I had assumed fetchmail was dead while getmail is alive. It is
actually the other way round!)
Not exactly sure what you mean here, but getmail looks alive to me - the
latest version was released less than
Celejar:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:08:41 +0200
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
(BTW, I had assumed fetchmail was dead while getmail is alive. It is
actually the other way round!)
Not exactly sure what you mean here, but getmail looks alive to me - the
latest version was released
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
I finally decided myself to install a software to manage my mails.
Good luck! My impression is that this is one of the few things that have
not become considerably easier on Linux in the last ten years.
Mutt is still a good choice today if you can live with the
to the dedicated section of the distant MTA where a bot
will learn from them, which will contribute to overall quality of the
service instead of only my computer.
One thing you do need to be careful with, no matter which MTA you
use. Don't make it an open relay - you'll soon become a source of
SPAM
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:13:27AM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
So, here is my question:
What would you use as a MTA on a Debian system made for an end-user?
mutt
fetchmail
procmail
msmtp
Check out
Le 09.10.2013 04:57, Celejar a écrit :
What would you use as a MTA on a Debian system made for an end-user?
I've used Exim, basically because it's (was?) the Debian default.
I do not want a default software just because it is the default.
Otherwise I would have be perfectly happy with
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Le 09.10.2013 04:57, Celejar a écrit :
Assuming you're using a smarthost (relay host), you
can use a relay server such as ssmpt, msmtp or nullmailer which I
believe all meet these two conditions.
By relay host, you mean the server from which I am sending
Le 09.10.2013 11:08, Jochen Spieker a écrit :
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
I finally decided myself to install a software to manage my mails.
Good luck! My impression is that this is one of the few things that
have
not become considerably easier on Linux in the last ten years.
Mutt is
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
Le 09.10.2013 11:08, Jochen Spieker a écrit :
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org:
- How do I plan to access mails using mutt (IMAP or local storage?)
IMAP.
Then the rest is really easy. Just point mutt to that IMAP server and
install+configure one of the
On 2013-10-09, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
- How do I plan to access mails using mutt (IMAP or local storage?)
IMAP. Local storage is probably nice for some uses, but I'll be honest:
I can not see the interest of reading all my mails without Internet
up an MTA on your netbook, but to do it and have all of
your mail forwarded from your existing host would require changing the
host MTA's configuration (MTA's push mail, not pull it) and wouldn't do
the filtering on the server you wish.
One thing you do need to be careful with, no matter which
Curt:
On 2013-10-09, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
- How do I plan to access mails using mutt (IMAP or local storage?)
IMAP. Local storage is probably nice for some uses, but I'll be honest:
I can not see the interest of reading all my mails without
On 2013-10-09, Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
SMTP is still the most common way to send e-mails (even if the user
doesn't see it). Some IMAP servers can send e-mails on their users'
behalf when mails are save into a special folder, but not all servers do
that.
What? I use SMTP.
Le 09.10.2013 14:05, Curt a écrit :
What use do you find for an MTA if you're using IMAP?
I do not know, really.
I simply have read here and there that it was needed, and since I have
noticed so much choice in aptitude, I asked here to understand what
solution would be the best.
If it is to
On 2013-10-09, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
I am trying to put myself into that world of local mail clients, so I
can not say if it does or not :)
There seems to be some confusion, as always.
I use alpine. Alpine sends my mail through my smart host
Curt:
On 2013-10-09, Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
SMTP is still the most common way to send e-mails (even if the user
doesn't see it). Some IMAP servers can send e-mails on their users'
behalf when mails are save into a special folder, but not all servers do
that.
What? I
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:02:09PM +0300, D.E. Bil wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:13:27AM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
What would you use as a MTA on a Debian system made for an end-user?
mutt
fetchmail
procmail
Not MTAs… I guess you're going one further and suggesting
I recommend exim. I've used it for 10 years. It is heavy-weight for
desktops/laptops, but the Debian packaging around it makes such
configuration situations a lot simpler. (The same packaging gets in the
way of running exim on a server, IMHO).
In the past I've tried simple MTAs designed for
On 2013-10-09, Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
I still advise anyone to run a local MTA, even if only for mails from
cron etc. But that is a matter of taste.
That's what I told the OP.
There are hooks which let you re-configure arbitrary configuration items
for certain events.
On Qua, 09 Out 2013, berenger.morel wrote:
So, I think I'll go for mutt
No one mentioned the simplest way: mutt now supports sending via smtp
directly:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttFaq/Sendmail#HowdoIconfigureMutttousearemoteSMTPservertosendmail
Since it also supports IMAP accounts
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:16:20PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:02:09PM +0300, D.E. Bil wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:13:27AM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
What would you use as a MTA on a Debian system made for an end-user?
mutt
On 2013-10-09, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
No one mentioned the simplest way: mutt now supports sending via smtp
directly:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttFaq/Sendmail#HowdoIconfigureMutttousearemoteSMTPservertosendmail
Oh I didn't realize mutt couldn't do that
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote at 2013-10-08 20:13 -0500:
that it needs 2 other tools: one to fetch mails from server, and
another one to send them.
mutt is capable of retrieving mail via IMAP or POP3. An alternative
option is getmail4.
You may want to use msmtp for sending mail.
From: berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:13:27 +0200
I use a tiling window managers: it will never spawn ugly dialog in
my face for a reason or another, and for the situations when I simply
want to run a TTY without X, it will fit perfectly too.
Reminiscent of the
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:10:15PM +, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Qua, 09 Out 2013, berenger.morel wrote:
So, I think I'll go for mutt
No one mentioned the simplest way: mutt now supports sending via
smtp directly:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:35:41PM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 09.10.2013 11:08, Jochen Spieker a écrit :
.snip.
This is handy if you use several different mail
providers
Few months ago, I had something like 4 or 5 addresses. It was a ugly
and
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:14:40 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
By relay host, you mean the server from which I am sending this mail
( through a web interface )? If so, yes, I only want to discuss with
it, except if there is some advantage ( for me or that server ) to
directly send
On 10/9/13, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:13:27 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
...
For the fetcher, I am surprised that debian does not seems to recommend
or suggest using one, so I will not spend time on that -for now at
least- and will do as the
Hi.
I finally decided myself to install a software to manage my mails.
So, I think I'll go for mutt: it appears quite often on the list ( so I
might ask if I have problems, before trying another one when everything
will be ok ) and runs into a terminal, which makes it perfect for me
since I
also been done over a period of years, not all at one
time.
One thing you do need to be careful with, no matter which MTA you use.
Don't make it an open relay - you'll soon become a source of SPAM. And
you should take steps to prevent bots from guessing your userid and
password (I use fail2ban
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:13:27 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
...
For the fetcher, I am surprised that debian does not seems to recommend
or suggest using one, so I will not spend time on that -for now at
least- and will do as the article says, unless I discover something
On Sunday 14 November 2004 16:40, David Garamond wrote:
David Garamond wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
choice of MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
+ vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
MTA to use.
Requirements:
- Maildir support;
- Software binary packages are in the main Debian archive (so we are
guaranteed prompt security updates
David Garamond wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
+ vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other MTAs.
I've used qmail ever since I've used Linux
David Garamond wrote:
David Garamond wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
choice of MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other MTAs.
I've used qmail ever
Cristi Banciu wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
choice of MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other MTAs.
I've used qmail ever since I've used Linux
David Garamond wrote:
Cristi Banciu wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
choice of MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other
MTAs. I've used qmail ever
robin wrote:
Looking via synaptic: qmail-src
Source only package for building qmail binary package
qmail is a secure Secure, reliable, efficient, simple mail transport
system.
Or you can use precompiled binary packages
http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Folks - a quite one...
With ssh on my Debian server I do not seem to be able to tunnel X back
to the client (however, from the client I can successfully tunnel X back
when connecting to another client). Obviously I'm doing something wrong
but any ideas? Here's the output from the remote
On Sunday 14 November 2004 15:19, David Garamond wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
+ vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
MTA to use.
Requirements:
- Maildir support;
- Software binary packages are in the main
On Sunday 14 November 2004 21:38, michael wrote:
Folks - a quite one...
With ssh on my Debian server I do not seem to be able to tunnel X back
to the client (however, from the client I can successfully tunnel X back
when connecting to another client). Obviously I'm doing something wrong
but
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 10:40:13PM +0700, David Garamond wrote:
David Garamond wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
+ vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when
Ollie Acheson wrote:
I guess my first question is why do you want to stop using qmail? It's
highly secure and robust, plus you have already climbed its learning curve.
The reasons are partly convenience and partly a political decision. We
try to use only packages from the official main Debian
the firewall,
but I drop the ball at mail. We have about 100 clients using
Microsoft Outlook, but our legacy address format is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't change the address format, and
I'd like to leave POP3 in place. Which MTA is the best given my
limitation?
You
and network stuff through the firewall,
but I drop the ball at mail. We have about 100 clients using
Microsoft Outlook, but our legacy address format is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't change the address format, and
I'd like to leave POP3 in place. Which MTA is the best
at mail. We have about 100
clients using Microsoft Outlook, but our legacy address format is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't change the address format, and I'd like to
leave POP3 in place. Which MTA is the best given my limitation?
Thanks,
Brooks
100
clients using Microsoft Outlook, but our legacy address format is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't change the address format, and I'd like to
leave POP3 in place. Which MTA is the best given my limitation?
Thanks,
Brooks
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/
null
Mime
ok, please don't lart me for not line-breaking correctly,
I'll do that myself:
lart($self) ;-)
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:20:47 +0100, Robert Waldner writes:
very log lines...
--
/ Robert Waldner [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Phone: +43 1 89933 0 Fax x533 \
\KPNQwest/AT tech staff|
leave POP3 in place. Which MTA is the best given my limitation?
Try XMail :
http://www.maticad.it/davide
ftp://ftp.maticad.it/pub/misc/mailsvr.zip
DESC
XMail is an Internet and intranet mail server featuring an SMTP server, POP3
server, finger server, multiple domains, no need for users
ML == Michael Laing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ML In the near future I may need to handle daily bulkmail to a list
ML of users in the 20,000-100,000 range.
I would check the documentation on www.exim.org. debian.org runs with
exim, and it does pretty well.
Ciao,
Martin
Can someone make a recommendation to me of which to use?
I am going to be handling email for 30-100 busy users.
There are 3 domains, but only one user list, i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the
same as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using smail right now and a text '/etc/aliases' file, generally
there is one
Hi,
I am looking into setting up email accounts for some of our assosciate
companies as well as clients. They will just be using pop3 to retrive
their email, no access to the server via telnet, ftp or whatever?
I understand that there are a number of MTA, snedmail, smail, qmail etc.
Which of
On Thu, Aug 20, 1998 at 02:08:01PM +0800, Ken Chew wrote:
Hi,
I am looking into setting up email accounts for some of our assosciate
companies as well as clients. They will just be using pop3 to retrive
their email, no access to the server via telnet, ftp or whatever?
I understand that
On Thu, Aug 20, 1998 at 12:24:00AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Ken Chew wrote:
Also would it be possible to create email account without actuall adding
user account on the system. Currently what we do is 'adduser' for every
user account. Is this necessary?
72 matches
Mail list logo
