Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-18 Thread Joris Huizer
Eric Dickner wrote: --- Stefan O'Rear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unstable means that the packages actually get upgraded. With stable, all you get is security fixes. Well, that's good to know. The word has many bad connotations in spite of its official definition. But stable _does_ have

Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-18 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 06:19:18PM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote: --- Stefan O'Rear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unstable means that the packages actually get upgraded. With stable, all you get is security fixes. Well, that's good to know. The word has many bad connotations in spite of

Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-17 Thread Eric Dickner
I have an application that was developed on RedHat that is calling for it. Apparently Debian doesn't have it yet, at least I can't seem to find it as a package. Does Debian lag behind RedHat on a lot of things like this and if so by how long? Is it worth getting the .rpm and alien'ing it over?

Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-17 Thread Stefan O'Rear
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:59:19PM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote: I have an application that was developed on RedHat that is calling for it. Apparently Debian doesn't have it yet, at least I can't seem to find it as a package. Does Debian lag behind RedHat on a lot of things like this and

Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-17 Thread John Hasler
Eric Dickner writes: I have an application that was developed on RedHat that is calling for it. Apparently Debian doesn't have it yet, at least I can't seem to find it as a package. Debian/Unstable: libstdc++5 - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 libstdc++5-3.3-dbg - The GNU Standard C++

Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-17 Thread Eric Dickner
--- Eric Dickner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric Dickner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon? To: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Debian/Unstable: libstdc

Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-17 Thread Stefan O'Rear
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:44:08PM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote: --- Eric Dickner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric Dickner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon? To: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Will Debian have libstdc++.so.5 soon?

2004-09-17 Thread Eric Dickner
--- Stefan O'Rear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unstable means that the packages actually get upgraded. With stable, all you get is security fixes. Well, that's good to know. The word has many bad connotations in spite of its official definition. But stable _does_ have libstdc++.so.5; you