Am 09.12.2012 um 07:48 schrieb P. J. McDermott:
I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian
GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests. I'm
trying to decide between Xen 4.0 (with paravirtualized guests and
probably the xend/xm toolstack) and qemu-kvm
Hello,
I'm using xen on my system too I have an CPU like yours.
In the system are 8GB Ram
There are three domU everyone with an own ip adress (bridging) I have
one domU with 512mb the other ones are with 1024mb ram.
the dom0 is running on wheezy. There are no problems at the moment.
The domU is
P. J. McDermott p...@nac.net wrote:
I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server
So now you have recommendations both ways :-)
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Peter Viskup skupko...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider LXC [2] in case you have some concerns of CPU/memory overhead
and you plan to run only Linux virtual servers.
LXC looks really nice but you need very up-to-date packages, and possibly
may even need to consider compiling from source.
Issues I've
P. J. McDermott p...@nac.net wrote:
I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian
GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests.
I'd recommend KVM and libvirt/VMM.
The server has two 3.0-GHz CPU cores (an AMD CPU with the AMD-V/SVM
virtualization
Greetings,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Chris Davies
chris-use...@roaima.co.uk wrote:
P. J. McDermott p...@nac.net wrote:
I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian
GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests.
I'd recommend KVM and libvirt/VMM.
On 12/09/2012 07:48 AM, P. J. McDermott wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian
GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests. I'm
trying to decide between Xen 4.0 (with paravirtualized guests and
probably the xend/xm toolstack) and
Hi,
I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian
GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests. I'm
trying to decide between Xen 4.0 (with paravirtualized guests and
probably the xend/xm toolstack) and qemu-kvm 0.12 or 1.1 (with the
libvirt tools).
My
i am using proxmox KVM.. on 3 base servers for more then 2 years.
i do migrate, backup and all the process intensive task and every
thing. till today i havent found any issue related to stabitliy.
once i remeber i havent started my virtual machines for 4 monts,and my
base, i never found a reason
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless there's a fedora-devel thread where this was discussed, there's
probably no way to know why RHEL6 switched to kvm except to assume
that kvm's in-kernel and xen isn't. This has changed in the latest
kernels so xen support
On 29 March 2012 22:59, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote:
Xen requires a patched kernel. It is unstable. It crashed on
me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff.
The system which experienced this
On 29/03/2012 00:44, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponceaaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that
the hypervisor model (putting an entirely new
On 30/03/2012 00:32, francis picabia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponceaaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
For me, it became yesterday's
On 30/03/2012 13:34, wlan wrote:
On my job we using KVM+Proxmox, This is pretty.
2012/3/30 Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) ubuntu.fan.2...@gmail.com
mailto:ubuntu.fan.2...@gmail.com
On 28/03/2012 16:36, Jon Dowland wrote:
On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
On 30/03/2012 13:59, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabiafpica...@gmail.com wrote:
Xen requires a patched kernel. It is unstable. It crashed on
me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff.
The system which experienced this returned to a standard
On Vi, 30 mar 12, 17:24:55, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
[snipped 38 lines]
May I know what is Proxmox?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=proxmox
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:27:14PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
Do you know when RHEL 7 might be released?
Take a look at when RHEL 6 came out (very recently) and how long the gap
between RHEL releases is on average (large) and extrapolate (not for years).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
VirtualBox and Virtual Iron and also Microsoft's Hyper-V is
based on Xen code I think.
This has no bearing on the relative performance merits of Xen vs. KVM.
(FWIW, I think you're wrong re VirtualBox, but Oracle do develop a branded
product based on Xen called Oracle VM, formerly Sun xVM. I'm fairly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just got interested about virtualization and noticed that this
thread is still going on.
As far as I can see, most people are currently recommending Xen.
Are there any GUIs or WebUIs for Xen or KVM and how do they work?
- --
Mika
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Jon Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:27:14PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
Do you know when RHEL 7 might be released?
Take a look at when RHEL 6 came out (very recently) and how long the gap
between RHEL releases is on
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 22:59, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote:
Xen requires a patched kernel. It is unstable. It crashed on
me randomly before
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
I just got interested about virtualization and noticed that this
thread is still going on.
As far as I can see, most people are currently recommending Xen.
The sample size of thread participants is too small to extrapolate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Proxmox VE seems to be it's own distribution and I don't understand
which should be run first with Ganeti :).
On 30.03.2012 15:42, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
I just got interested about
Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2012 schrieb francis picabia:
Xen requires a patched kernel. It is unstable. It crashed on
me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff.
The system which experienced this returned to a standard
Debian kernel and never had a problem again.
Not any
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:13:40 -0700, Hilco wrote in message
CAE1pOi2xCrw=gr+tgymkojw6a9wonsesaqe74yve14umto5...@mail.gmail.com:
RH employs some of the KVM devs. RH apparently has not contributed to
Xen for several years and has now decided to only support a single
code base: KVM. It does not
to further the discussion.
Oracle VirtualBox and Virtual Iron and also Microsoft's Hyper-V is
based on Xen code I think.
This has no bearing on the relative performance merits of Xen vs. KVM.
(FWIW, I think you're wrong re VirtualBox, but Oracle do develop a branded
product based on Xen called
Do you know when RHEL 7 might be released?
If you had asked that a couple of months ago, I would have said late 2013
since, in the past, a new release came just before support ended on the version
two versions prior to it. In this case, RHEL 5, whose support ends in early
2014. But Red
On Friday 30 March 2012 18:09:44 Tony van der Hoff wrote:
For heaven's sake, it is perfectly evident that this guy (Zhang Enming)
is setting up as a troll. Admittedly, he's doing it quite well, but
let's stop responding to his ranting, and he'll get bored.
I came to that same conclusion, but
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that
the hypervisor
On 28/03/2012 16:35, Jon Dowland wrote:
On 27/03/12 14:32, Aaron Toponce wrote:
IMO, Xen isn't yesterday's virtualization technology. It's very
current, stable, flexible, supported and very much today's
virtualization technology.
For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became
On 28/03/2012 16:36, Jon Dowland wrote:
On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
I am also in favor of Xen.
You have just said, not two messages ago, that you've never even tried
KVM. I always prefer to base my opinions on evidence, personally.
Yes, I have never tried Linux
On my job we using KVM+Proxmox, This is pretty.
2012/3/30 Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) ubuntu.fan.2...@gmail.com
On 28/03/2012 16:36, Jon Dowland wrote:
On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
I am also in favor of Xen.
You have just said, not two messages ago, that you've
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote:
Xen requires a patched kernel. It is unstable. It crashed on
me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff.
The system which experienced this returned to a standard
Debian kernel and never had a
On 27/03/12 14:32, Aaron Toponce wrote:
IMO, Xen isn't yesterday's virtualization technology. It's very
current, stable, flexible, supported and very much today's
virtualization technology.
For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that
the hypervisor model (putting an
On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
I am also in favor of Xen.
You have just said, not two messages ago, that you've never even tried
KVM. I always prefer to base my opinions on evidence, personally.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that
the hypervisor model (putting an entirely new kernel between Linux and
the hardware) created all sorts of performance problems, and neglected
the decades of work
On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that
the hypervisor model (putting an entirely new kernel between Linux and
the hardware) created
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:04:57PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
When will Debian 7.0 be released? Debian with Linux Kernel 3.x
release seems very slow when all the other Linux distros already
have the latest Linux
On 27/03/2012 21:32, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:04:57PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
When will Debian 7.0 be released? Debian with Linux Kernel 3.x
release seems very slow when all the other Linux
From: ubuntu.fan.2...@gmail.com
To: aaron.topo...@gmail.com; debian-user@lists.debian.org;
singapore.mr.teo.en.m...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Xen vs KVM
On 27/03/2012 21:32, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:04:57PM
.
The specific needs of the usecase should lead you to the choice to be
made!
Best regards!
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:55:31 +0800
From: ubuntu.fan.2...@gmail.com
To: aaron.topo...@gmail.com; debian-user@lists.debian.org;
singapore.mr.teo.en.m...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Xen vs KVM
On 27
Boa tarde lista,
gostaria de algumas considerações sobre qual seria a melhor escolha para
dois servidores de virtualização com alta disponibilidade e balanceamento de
carga, estou preocupado com a utilização do Xen a longo prazo pois tanto a
Red Hat quanto o Ubuntu deixaram de oferecer soluções de
Artigo muito bom sobre o assunto. Atente para os comentários:
http://lwn.net/Articles/321696/
2009/3/26 William Pereira de Paula williamkbl...@gmail.com
Boa tarde lista,
gostaria de algumas considerações sobre qual seria a melhor escolha para
dois servidores de virtualização com alta
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du mercredi 13 juin 2007, vers 22:12,
Daniel Huhardeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
J'alloue le fichier RAW sur une partition dédiée en LVM et xfs ;-)
Je l'utilise depuis longtemps en PROD sur des serveurs Dell rackable
Maintenant, xen fait de la virtualisation
Salut,
je suis à la recherche de bench, feeedback concernant kvm et xen.
Je connais et je me sers de xen tous les jours en PROD en version 2.x donc
sans support Windows pour le guest.
Vu que kvm est intégré au kernel, je me dis qu'il doit être performant
(c'est purement subjectif :) ).
Très intéressé par la question aussi
Le 13/06/07, Franck[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Salut,
je suis à la recherche de bench, feeedback concernant kvm et xen.
Je connais et je me sers de xen tous les jours en PROD en version 2.x donc
sans support Windows pour le guest.
Vu que kvm est
Galevsky a écrit :
Très intéressé par la question aussi
Le 13/06/07, Franck[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Salut,
je suis à la recherche de bench, feeedback concernant kvm et xen.
Je connais et je me sers de xen tous les jours en PROD en version 2.x
donc
sans support Windows pour le guest.
Salut,
Galevsky a écrit :
Très intéressé par la question aussi
Le 13/06/07, Franck[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Salut,
je suis à la recherche de bench, feeedback concernant kvm et xen.
Je connais et je me sers de xen tous les jours en PROD en version 2.x
donc
sans support Windows pour
Franck a écrit :
[...]
Ceci dit, Xen fait de la paravirtualisation alors que KVM fait de la
virtualisation. Il faut donc, pour utiliser KVM, avoir le processeur qui
va bien. Ensuite, il faut avoir de la mémoire car KVM alloue la resource
à l'OS hébergé (RAM dédiée donc). Enfin KVM repose pour
49 matches
Mail list logo
