On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:17:05 -0600, David Wright wrote:
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 23:24:31 (+), Brian wrote:
Something for people to get their teeth into. From the first post:
> apt-get changelog libxslt1.1
> Err Changelog for libxslt1.1
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:17:05 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 23:24:31 (+), Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 14:20:57 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+), Brian wrote:
> > > > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 23:24:31 (+), Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 14:20:57 -0600, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+), Brian wrote:
> > > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +,
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 14:20:57 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+), Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+), Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> > > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch,
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> > >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is
> >now moribund apart from LTS.
>
> We
On Sat 05 Nov 2016 at 20:53:47 +0100, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Brian:
> >
> > It's quite amazing what people expect to be supported on this list.
> > Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
>
> That's not entirely true:
>
>
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
On Sat 05 Nov 2016 at 19:06:49 +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
Running...
$ apt-get changelog UPGRADEABLE_PACKAGE
...on a wheezy system pointed at these sources...
$ grep '^deb ' /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://debian.univ-lorraine.fr/debian/
Brian:
>
> It's quite amazing what people expect to be supported on this list.
> Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
That's not entirely true:
https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/
Wheezy is still in LTS support until end of May 2018. I don't know
whether
On Sat 05 Nov 2016 at 19:06:49 +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> Running...
>
> $ apt-get changelog UPGRADEABLE_PACKAGE
>
> ...on a wheezy system pointed at these sources...
>
> $ grep '^deb ' /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://debian.univ-lorraine.fr/debian/ wheezy-updates main
>
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
[snip]
In the example above, I sought to read a description of the differences
between my currently installed libxslt1.1 package, and the more recent
available version.
Instead, to obtain changelogs, the 8-step workflow outlined below is
typical
Running...
$ apt-get changelog UPGRADEABLE_PACKAGE
...on a wheezy system pointed at these sources...
$ grep '^deb ' /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://debian.univ-lorraine.fr/debian/ wheezy-updates main
deb http://debian.univ-lorraine.fr/debian/ wheezy main
deb
13 matches
Mail list logo
