Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> This suggests (no pun intended) it was installed manually
> (`apt list usbguard` would confirm this), as Suggests are
> not installed by default.
alias ai='sudo apt-get --install-suggests install'
https://dataswamp.org/~incal/conf/.zsh/apt
--
underground experts united
On Lu, 14 iun 21, 09:46:02, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >>
> >> If so I don't remember why :)
> >
> > But aptitude might know:
> >
> > aptitude why usbguard
>
> OK:
>
> i gnome-online-accounts Recommends gnome-control-center (>= 3.6.1)
> i A gnome-control-center Depends
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Removing usbguard is maybe a drastic decision, isn't?
> Or maybe you don't want this package anymore for
> other reasons?
No, why do I need it for?
>>>
>>> He probably assumed you installed it intentionally, and so
>>> for a reason, as it appears to
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:46:02AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > Removing usbguard is maybe a drastic decision, isn't?
> > Or maybe you don't want this package anymore for
> > other reasons?
>
> No, why do I need it for?
> >>>
> >>> He
On Du, 13 iun 21, 21:49:03, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>
> >>> Removing usbguard is maybe a drastic decision, isn't?
> >>> Or maybe you don't want this package anymore for
> >>> other reasons?
> >>
> >> No, why do I need it for?
> >
> > He probably assumed you installed it intentionally,
l0f4r0 wrote:
>> He probably assumed you installed it intentionally, and so
>> for a reason, as it appears to be an optional package.
>>
> Exactly! You should have had a good reason Emanuel to
> install it at the first place, no?
I don't remember.
> This package can be useful to limit access to
Curt wrote:
>>> Removing usbguard is maybe a drastic decision, isn't?
>>> Or maybe you don't want this package anymore for
>>> other reasons?
>>
>> No, why do I need it for?
>
> He probably assumed you installed it intentionally, and so
> for a reason, as it appears to be an optional package.
If
l0f4r0 wrote:
> Removing usbguard is maybe a drastic decision, isn't?
> Or maybe you don't want this package anymore for
> other reasons?
No, why do I need it for?
Anyway it is removed now...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Hi,
13 juin 2021, 17:51 de cu...@free.fr:
> On 2021-06-13, Emanuel Berg wrote:
>
>> l0f4r0 wrote:
>>
>>> Removing usbguard is maybe a drastic decision, isn't?
>>> Or maybe you don't want this package anymore for
>>> other reasons?
>>>
>> No, why do I need it for?
>>
> He probably assumed you
On 2021-06-13, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> l0f4r0 wrote:
>
>> Removing usbguard is maybe a drastic decision, isn't?
>> Or maybe you don't want this package anymore for
>> other reasons?
>
> No, why do I need it for?
He probably assumed you installed it intentionally, and so for a reason,
as it appears
On 2021-06-13, l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
>
> Otherwise, you could just add a rule authorizing your device to connect:
>
> sudo usbguard append-rule 'allow id : serial "" name "" hash
> "" parent-hash "" with-interface XX:XX:XX'
>
> sudo usbguard list-devices
> will tell you
Hi,
12 juin 2021, 21:54 de moasenw...@zoho.eu:
> deloptes wrote:
>
>>> "Device is not authorized for usage", that's probably the
>>> problem, right?
>>>
>>
>> google says in context of Ubuntu - USBGuard the package is
>> also in debian - could be you have it installed?
>>
>
> I did, and when I
deloptes wrote:
>> "Device is not authorized for usage", that's probably the
>> problem, right?
>
> google says in context of Ubuntu - USBGuard the package is
> also in debian - could be you have it installed?
I did, and when I removed it, it works again!
Thanks a lot!
Straight expert advice!
deloptes wrote:
>> I don't remember this was anything one had to do but no, how
>> do you do that?
>
> I don't use iphone/android, but last time I did (2-3 months
> ago), when I plugged the cable it prompted on the phone and
> asked if I allow the access for this device. If it is not
> prompted
deloptes wrote:
>> But suddenly it doesn't work, it says:
>>
>> Device 0 (VID=04e8 and PID=6860) is a Samsung Galaxy models (MTP).
>> libusb_get_active_config_descriptor(1) failed: No data available
>> no active configuration, trying to set configuration
>> libusb_get_active_config_descriptor(2)
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> "Device is not authorized for usage", that's probably the
> problem, right?
google says in context of Ubuntu - USBGuard
the package is also in debian - could be you have it installed?
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> I don't remember this was anything one had to do but no, how
> do you do that?
I don't use iphone/android, but last time I did (2-3 months ago), when I
plugged the cable it prompted on the phone and asked if I allow the access
for this device.
If it is not prompted look at
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> But suddenly it doesn't work, it says:
>
> Device 0 (VID=04e8 and PID=6860) is a Samsung Galaxy models (MTP).
> libusb_get_active_config_descriptor(1) failed: No data available
> no active configuration, trying to set configuration
> libusb_get_active_config_descriptor(2)
I use to use this little zsh
#! /bin/zsh
mount-smartphone () {
jmtpfs $(mktemp -d phone.XX)
}
alias smph=mount-smartphone
to mount the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 LTE GT-N7105 16GB (t0lte,
Android 4.4.2) smartphone filesystem in my $HOME.
But suddenly it doesn't work, it says:
19 matches
Mail list logo
