deloptes schreef op 28-12-2016 20:17:
Xen wrote:
Xen schreef op 27-12-2016 23:13:
Lost my temper there, Winston would say. Yes, I play video games too.
What's the problem with that? You have a problem with that too? :).
Also still want to add, If I may.
No need to be so sensitive to
Xen wrote:
> Xen schreef op 27-12-2016 23:13:
>
>> Lost my temper there, Winston would say. Yes, I play video games too.
>> What's the problem with that? You have a problem with that too? :).
>
> Also still want to add, If I may.
>
No need to be so sensitive to what I say. We also do "wrong"
Xen schreef op 27-12-2016 23:13:
Lost my temper there, Winston would say. Yes, I play video games too.
What's the problem with that? You have a problem with that too? :).
Also still want to add, If I may.
That even Mediawiki probably doesn't provide all the tools you'd need to
completely
Xen schreef op 27-12-2016 22:54:
What I do works and provides a solution. What you do is complain and
you do not provide anything, save for yourself, but I am not helped
with that, nor is anyone else if you complain like that.
Now enough.
Lost my temper there, Winston would say. Yes, I play
Greg Wooledge schreef op 27-12-2016 22:44:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:43:19PM +0100, Xen wrote:
Wrong does not exist.
Irony.
It is perfectly acceptable to do things a different way.
It is also perfectly clear that many tools such as Dokuwiki do not
provide the tools that perhaps Mediawiki
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:43:19PM +0100, Xen wrote:
> Wrong does not exist.
Irony.
deloptes schreef op 27-12-2016 21:05:
You are an i**ot I would immediately fire. Start reading the interfaces
and
using the programs as designed. If you want to do things your own way I
do
not want to know about it.
Nobody asked you about it. You should stop feeling addressed as if you
Xen wrote:
> Wrong. These programs typically create stuff without g+w so your user
> has no write access to it.
>
> So you need at least one of the solutions mentioned.
You keep insisting doing wrong things. If you use mediawiki, you do not need
write access as a user. Leave this to the system
Gene Heskett schreef op 27-12-2016 15:51:
Since they create lost of files those programs typically create those
files as the user the webserver is running as, which would typically
be www-data. Sometimes you want to be able those files directly as a
user outside of the application (which is
On Tuesday 27 December 2016 07:28:58 Xen wrote:
> Nicolas George schreef op 23-12-2016 9:32:
> > Le tridi 3 nivôse, an CCXXV, Xen a écrit :
> >> I think my point was more that I didn't know how to chgrp, but I
> >> found I
> >> needed to add myself to www-data first before I could chgrp to it.
>
Nicolas George schreef op 23-12-2016 9:32:
Le tridi 3 nivôse, an CCXXV, Xen a écrit :
I think my point was more that I didn't know how to chgrp, but I found
I
needed to add myself to www-data first before I could chgrp to it.
Just a basic sanity check:
If your web server is running as
Greg Wooledge schreef op 23-12-2016 14:07:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 01:17:23AM +0100, Xen wrote:
Life becomes a whole lot easier if you can do stuff with your regular
user, which is why I am putting stuff in my user home directory in the
first place, instead of some central location.
Making
Hi Xen,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:24:59PM +0100, Xen wrote:
> I am trying to get a webserver to run under my regular user, or at
> least to have the website's files under control of my regular user,
> but the webserver runs as www-data.
You've been shown how to put yourself in the www-data
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 01:17:23AM +0100, Xen wrote:
> Life becomes a whole lot easier if you can do stuff with your regular
> user, which is why I am putting stuff in my user home directory in the
> first place, instead of some central location.
Making your life easier should NOT be your #1
Le tridi 3 nivôse, an CCXXV, Xen a écrit :
> I think my point was more that I didn't know how to chgrp, but I found I
> needed to add myself to www-data first before I could chgrp to it.
Just a basic sanity check:
If your web server is running as www-data, then it is better if the
files do NOT
chgrp as a user.
Is there any way to achieve this?
I mean I could add my user's group to the www-data user and I guess
then I'd
have access but I don't really see how changing a file's group could
be a
security risk. Maybe I should add myself to www-data instead?
Yes, add your regular user
deloptes schreef op 23-12-2016 0:40:
perhaps you want to chown your-user.www-data /path
or something like
php5 -S : Run with built-in web server.
Give up the bad ideas, seriously!
I think my point was more that I didn't know how to chgrp, but I found I
needed to add myself to www-data
Xen wrote:
> Is there any way to achieve this?
there is no need to run a web server as your user.
perhaps you want to chown your-user.www-data /path
or something like
php5 -S : Run with built-in web server.
Give up the bad ideas, seriously!
trhstfd
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:24:59PM +0100, Xen wrote:
> I am trying to get a webserver to run under my regular user, or at least to
> have the website's files under control of my regular user, but the webserver
> runs as www-data.
>
> But it seems I cannot do chgrp as a user.
>
I am trying to get a webserver to run under my regular user, or at least
to have the website's files under control of my regular user, but the
webserver runs as www-data.
But it seems I cannot do chgrp as a user.
Is there any way to achieve this?
I mean I could add my user's group to the www
20 matches
Mail list logo
