Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-09 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Michelle, Am 18:48 2002-12-04 -0800 hat Michelle Storm geschrieben: We are on a network with a cable modem connected to a switch, and then the computers are all connected to the switch. The problem is that each computer is on a different IP (and I was told different subnets), so that when

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-07 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Michelle, Am 18:48 2002-12-04 -0800 hat Michelle Storm geschrieben: We are on a network with a cable modem connected to a switch, and then the computers are all connected to the switch. The problem is that each computer is on a different IP (and I was told different subnets), so that when

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-05 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:56PM -0800, Michelle Storm wrote: So, let me make sure I have this clear. My Current system: Linux dragon 2.4.19-k7 #1 Tue Nov 19 03:01:13 EST 2002 i686 AMD Athalon GNU/Linux On Linux Box: - 1) if I don't already have it installed. Install

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-05 Thread Ben Hartshorne
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:46:52PM -0800, Shawn Lamson wrote: --- Michelle Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I need to know what I have to change on my computer (if anything) so

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-05 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:45:36AM -0800, Ben Hartshorne wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:46:52PM -0800, Shawn Lamson wrote: --- Michelle Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-04 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:48:58PM -0800, Michelle Storm wrote: I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I need to know what I have to change on my computer (if anything) so that they can see each other. Even if I just ftp

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-04 Thread Shawn Lamson
--- Michelle Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I need to know what I have to change on my computer (if anything) so that they can see each other. Even if I just ftp to an IP

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-04 Thread Michelle Storm
Use RFC1918 addresses; they are intended for use in private networks. So, if no-one connected to the switch is using 192.168.20.0/24 (it's way too huge, but oh well), you can use addresses from that network. Before we eliminated the computer we used as a gateway. We all had ip's assigned, we

Re: What to change for eth0 (Direct PC connection)

2002-12-04 Thread Michelle Storm
So, let me make sure I have this clear. My Current system: Linux dragon 2.4.19-k7 #1 Tue Nov 19 03:01:13 EST 2002 i686 AMD Athalon GNU/Linux On Linux Box: - 1) if I don't already have it installed. Install the package: iproute 2) do from #: ip addr add 192.168.0.20 brd + dev

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-24 Thread David Teague
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Fraser Campbell wrote: On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote: Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux? (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-24 Thread David Teague
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Phil Brutsche wrote: A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux? (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-24 Thread Fraser Campbell
David Teague wrote: Network edition for DirecPC. Unfortunately it costs $199 US and I have no experience with whether it works or not: http://www.helius.com/DirecPC/ Is this Network edition for DirecPC new? You are sure about the price? Hi David, I sent that link. Click on the URL

direct-pc

1999-09-22 Thread Kenneth Scharf
Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux? (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with linux) I can't get cable modem, or asdl where I live, and this service is in the same price

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-22 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux? (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with linux) I can't get cable modem

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-22 Thread David Teague
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote: Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux? (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with linux) I can't get cable modem, or asdl where I

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-22 Thread Fraser Campbell
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote: Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux? (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with linux) I can't get cable modem, or asdl where I

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-22 Thread Seth R Arnold
Satelites have more latency than other services -- so, ftp would run very nice and quick and all, but something such as quake would be painfully slow. On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 05:30:00AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote: Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux? (thats the satellite inter-net

Re: direct-pc

1999-09-22 Thread Gary Hennigan
Seth R Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Satelites have more latency than other services -- so, ftp would run very nice and quick and all, but something such as quake would be painfully slow. Latency is definately a problem (those satellites are a LONG way from you), and remember that the