On Monday, January 15, 2018 01:51:30 PM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> (My understanding of SMTP may be faulty, but, AIUI, if your ISP is your
> SMTP server, email is stored there (unless deleted) (so that you can
> access it from more than one of your computers.
For the record:
1) My
On Mon 15 Jan 2018 at 16:22:26 -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:42:34PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 15 Jan 2018 at 14:51:56 -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:34:33PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As other people
On 01/15/18 22:30, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:56:20PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
I would not recommend having a emailserver on the same server as a
website, because if the website is compromised the "hacker" can just use
the mail() function
to send
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:56:20PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
> >> I would not recommend having a emailserver on the same server as a
> >> website, because if the website is compromised the "hacker" can just use
> >> the mail() function
> >> to send emails in your name.
> > so can she/he if the
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:42:34PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 15 Jan 2018 at 14:51:56 -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:34:33PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
> > >
> > > As other people already have said - do you really need emailserver of
> > > this kind?
> >
> >
On Mon 15 Jan 2018 at 14:08:35 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 15, 2018 01:58:08 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:51:30PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Does the SMTP server encrypt both between it and the "client" and between
> > > it and the
On Mon 15 Jan 2018 at 14:51:56 -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:34:33PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
> >
> > As other people already have said - do you really need emailserver of
> > this kind?
>
> This however is a valid question. A full functional mailserver
to grant to their mailbox providers. The amount of info that
> > can be extracted is directly proportional to their AI skills, while what
> > they do with it only depends on how much greedy they are.
> >
> > Given this state of affairs, the absence of a clean method for set
>> I would not recommend having a emailserver on the same server as a
>> website, because if the website is compromised the "hacker" can just use
>> the mail() function
>> to send emails in your name.
> so can she/he if the mailserver is on a different host. That doesn't make
> any difference.
It
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:34:33PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-15 00:19, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 16:43:53 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 02:26:03 PM Brian wrote:
> >>> On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 12:49:46 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com
can be done regardless of whether the email server is physically
the same computer as the web server. That separation (or lack thereof)
is not relevant.
018 10:36:40 AM J.W. Foster wrote:
>>>>> I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an
>>>>> email server located on an existing website server. I have installed;
>>>>> exim4 light, dovecot, Thunderbird, OpenSSL, and TLS security. I hav
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:58:08PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:51:30PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Does the SMTP server encrypt both between it and the "client" and between
> > it
> > and the other end destination / source?
>
> No, not always. Plaintext
On Monday, January 15, 2018 01:58:08 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:51:30PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Does the SMTP server encrypt both between it and the "client" and between
> > it and the other end destination / source?
>
> No, not always. Plaintext SMTP is
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:51:30PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does the SMTP server encrypt both between it and the "client" and between it
> and the other end destination / source?
No, not always. Plaintext SMTP is the default for transferring mail
from one server to another.
; they do with it only depends on how much greedy they are.
>
> Given this state of affairs, the absence of a clean method for setting up
> an email server is particularly obnoxious, IMHO.
Thanks very much--that helps a lot, but due to my ignorance of email systems,
let me ask a followup:
D
f trust users have to grant to their
mailbox providers. The amount of info that can be extracted is directly
proportional to their AI skills, while what they do with it only depends on how
much greedy they are.
Given this state of affairs, the absence of a clean method for setting up an
email server is particu
On Monday, January 15, 2018 04:39:17 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Since most email messages are sent in cleartext, it is also worth to note
> explicitly the difference in terms of privacy between receiving and
> collecting.
I don't understand, can you (or someone) attempt to clarify / amplify?
14, 2018 10:36:40 AM J.W. Foster wrote:
>>>>> I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an
>>>>> email server located on an existing website server. I have
>>>>> installed; exim4 light, dovecot, Thunderbird, OpenSSL, and TLS
Thunde
am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an
> > > > email server located on an existing website server. I have installed;
> > > > exim4 light, dovecot, Thunderbird, OpenSSL, and TLS security. I have
> > > > tried following several bits of documen
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 02:26:03 PM Brian wrote:
> On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 12:49:46 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 10:36:40 AM J.W. Foster wrote:
> > > I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an
> > > email se
basti wrote:
> exim users mailing list would be a good place for your question I think.
>
basti, first of all we do not top post and second we reply to the message we
intend to answer.
As I've been using exim extensively and was part of team supporting cloud
with exim and imap (dovecot), I can
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:36:40 + (UTC)
"J.W. Foster" <jfoster81...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an
> email server located on an existing website server.
As you say, you won't have trouble finding basic instructions. W
On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 12:49:46 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 10:36:40 AM J.W. Foster wrote:
> > I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an email
> > server located on an existing website server. I have installed; exim4
>
On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 15:36:40 +, J.W. Foster wrote:
> I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an
> email server located on an existing website server. I have installed;
> exim4 light, dovecot, Thunderbird, OpenSSL, and TLS security. I have
> tried follo
exim users mailing list would be a good place for your question I think.
On 14.01.2018 19:40, deloptes wrote:
> J.W. Foster wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an email
>> server located on an existing website server. I have installe
J.W. Foster wrote:
> I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an email
> server located on an existing website server. I have installed; exim4
> light, dovecot, Thunderbird, OpenSSL, and TLS security. I have tried
> following several bits of documentati
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 10:36:40 AM J.W. Foster wrote:
> I am looking for a reliable step by step process for setting up an email
> server located on an existing website server. I have installed; exim4
> light, dovecot, Thunderbird, OpenSSL, and TLS security. I have tried
> follo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016年5月26日 23:26:38 JST, Logan Erbst <lo...@iccamnetworking.us> wrote:
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>I am running an email server Postfix/Dovecot. I had solved the problem
>with securing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I am running an email server Postfix/Dovecot. I had solved the problem
with securing the IMAP connection (ie: Requiring an SSL/TLS connection
before authenticating) Now I need to set the server to require an
SSL/LTS connection and to authenticate
I am running a private email server on a VPS using Jessie, and I was wondering if anyone here has any tips for securing it.
SSH root access is disabled.
SSL/TLS connections are enabled on all connections, incoming and outgoing.
Plaintext auth is enables (need to disable it on unencrypted
On 1/25/2014 1:09 PM, Garry wrote:
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my
house. I have everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one
setup successfully about a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure
out how I did it.
There's only two email addresses I
On 1/26/2014 4:19 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 1/25/2014 1:09 PM, Garry wrote:
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my
house. I have everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one
setup successfully about a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure
out how I did
On 26/01/14 09:19, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 1/25/2014 1:09 PM, Garry wrote:
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my
house. I have everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one
setup successfully about a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure
out how I did
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my house. I have
everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one setup successfully about
a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure out how I did it.
There's only two email addresses I would like to setup.
I would like
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 01:09:52PM -0600, Garry wrote:
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my house. I
have everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one setup
successfully about a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure out how I did
it.
There's only
On 1/25/2014 2:09 PM, Garry wrote:
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my house. I have
everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one setup successfully about
a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure out how I did it.
There's only two email addresses I
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:09:52 -0600
Garry gcon...@icloud.com wrote:
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my
house. I have everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one
setup successfully about a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure
out how I did
On 25/01/14 19:09, Garry wrote:
I would like to setup a simple email server and run it out of my house. I have
everything needed in order to do it. In fact I had one setup successfully about
a year ago and crashed it. I can't figure out how I did it.
There's only two email addresses I would
Good day.
I have to forward email ports from local net to the whole world. At
the same time I have a local email server that functions too. -
Therefore I have I divide the requests between those coming to the
local one and those that go to the outer one.
Having said that I have:
world's net
On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Your DNS service appears to be provided by this outfit below. You would
contact this outfit to change your MX records. My guess is that there
is a ton of reselling and partnering going on here behind the scenes,
and you may not have any clue who
On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The devil is in the details. If your home broadband ISP is going to
host your DNS, you _must_ inform your domain registrar, Netsol in this
case, of your new DNS servers' and their IP addresses. Then you must
explicitly tell your broadband ISP
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/15/2009 4:36 AM:
On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The devil is in the details. If your home broadband ISP is going to
host your DNS, you _must_ inform your domain registrar, Netsol in this
case, of your new DNS servers' and their IP addresses.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 07:42:41AM -0500, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
so I have a DynDNS domain, that I have pointed to my
router, and I want to make a mail server for that, to test
with, get it setup, then I can move my REAL domain to
it... All I want is a simple setup, 2-3 users, just to
test
On Mon December 14 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
If you run your mail on a dynamic IP you will probably find
many sites rejecting it -- it may be listed in a PBL such as
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/ (either now, or in the future).
I'd recommend relaying your outbound email via either your
ISPs
On Mon December 14 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
If you run your mail on a dynamic IP you will probably find
many sites rejecting it -- it may be listed in a PBL such as
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/ (either now, or in the future).
I'd recommend relaying your outbound email via either your
ISPs
On Dom, 13 Dez 2009, Joe wrote:
Apologies for the source of this, but it's what I frequently quote
to people needing to test mail servers, and it seems accurate, just
ignore references to Exchange:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/153119
Easier than talking SMTP directly is using the
On Dom, 13 Dez 2009, Paul Cartwright wrote:
no, I don't want to host MY domain on dyndns, I want to host my dyndns domain
on my laptop, just to setup test my own email server. I want to host my
REAL domain at home, on my Debian Desktop. but I want to GET IT RIGHT
before I mess up my domain
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Dom, 13 Dez 2009, Paul Cartwright wrote:
no, I don't want to host MY domain on dyndns, I want to host my dyndns
domain
on my laptop, just to setup test my own email server. I want to host my
REAL domain at home, on my Debian Desktop. but I want to GET
On Mon December 14 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
How is your connection at home? Mail servers usually don't like
consumer IPs (from ADSL, cable and similar providers) because there
are many spammers in these dynamic ranges. So you will probably have
problems hosting a mail server
Please reply to the list.
On Seg, 14 Dez 2009, Joe wrote:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Easier than talking SMTP directly is using the swaks utility,
available in the swaks package.
Is it cross-platform?
It's written in Perl, and Perl is cross-platform. So I'd say yes.
I regret to say
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon December 14 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
If you run your mail on a dynamic IP you will probably find
many sites rejecting it -- it may be listed in a PBL such as
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/ (either now, or in the future).
I'd recommend relaying your outbound email via
On Mon December 14 2009, Alan Chandler wrote:
Normally when you get a domain name, you should get the facility to edit
the name servers zone file for the domain. You then point the MX
records where you like - just point it/them at this same static ip.
I've had my domain for quite a few
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon December 14 2009, Alan Chandler wrote:
Normally when you get a domain name, you should get the facility to edit
the name servers zone file for the domain. You then point the MX
records where you like - just point it/them at this same static ip.
I've had my
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:27:25PM +, Alan Chandler
wrote:
Normally when you get a domain name, you should get the
facility to edit the name servers zone file for the
domain. You then point the MX records where you like -
just point it/them at this same static ip.
Just to be picky, you
On Mon December 14 2009, Alan Chandler wrote:
if I dropped my domain hosting company, you are saying I would go back to
network Solutions to get my MX records done? or my ISP...
Presumably Network Solutions.
I have Freeparking.co.uk look after my domains, and they provide me with
a web
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/14/2009 6:11 AM:
On Mon December 14 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
If you run your mail on a dynamic IP you will probably find
many sites rejecting it -- it may be listed in a PBL such as
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/ (either now, or in the future).
I'd recommend
On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
From previous posts, I thought you already had an internet mail server
running at a colo facility, or a VPS server running an internet mail
server, and thus the basic prerequisite experience to setup another
internet mail server. Now, from you
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/14/2009 7:44 AM:
if I dropped my domain hosting company, you are saying I would go back to
network Solutions to get my MX records done? or my ISP...
Not unless Netsol was/is providing your DNS. It doesn't appear to be
the case:
Registrant:
Paul B Cartwright
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/14/2009 7:39 PM:
I asked my ISP, and the response I got tells me they can take care of all the
MX records, and those kinds of things. Yet, I agree, there is lots more to
it. Not the smallest of which is S P @ M containment. Going from a hosting
service that
so I have a DynDNS domain, that I have pointed to my router, and I want to
make a mail server for that, to test with, get it setup, then I can move my
REAL domain to it... All I want is a simple setup, 2-3 users, just to test
incoming ( and outgoing) emails to a dnydns domain. What is the
incoming ( and outgoing) emails to a dnydns domain. What is the simplest,
easiest setup I can do?
I don't know if it's the simplest or easiest, but the default email server,
exim4, should be pretty easy to set up as you describe. After installation run
'dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config' to be presented
On Sun December 13 2009, Liam O'Toole wrote:
I don't know if it's the simplest or easiest, but the default email server,
exim4, should be pretty easy to set up as you describe. After installation
run 'dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config' to be presented with a configuration
wizard.
yeah, after
, just to test
incoming ( and outgoing) emails to a dnydns domain. What is the simplest,
easiest setup I can do?
I don't know if it's the simplest or easiest, but the default email server,
exim4, should be pretty easy to set up as you describe. After installation run
'dpkg-reconfigure exim4
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/13/2009 6:42 AM:
so I have a DynDNS domain, that I have pointed to my router, and I want to
make a mail server for that, to test with, get it setup, then I can move my
REAL domain to it... All I want is a simple setup, 2-3 users, just to test
incoming ( and
On Sun December 13 2009, Joe wrote:
You can split the task of testing if you have the use of an external
Internet connection, possibly over ssh: you can connect to your own
server by IP address or by name using telnet. Apologies for the source
of this, but it's what I frequently quote to
Eeeww, you're in a bad neighborhood Paul:
Dec 13 14:35:52 greer postfix/smtpd[16900]: connect from
liquid1.wznoc.com[72.52.240.41]
Dec 13 14:35:52 greer postfix/smtpd[16900]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
liquid1.wznoc.com[72.52.240.41]: 554 5.7.1
liquid1.wznoc.com[72.52.240.41]: Client host
to host my dyndns domain
on my laptop, just to setup test my own email server. I want to host my
REAL domain at home, on my Debian Desktop. but I want to GET IT RIGHT
before I mess up my domain emails...
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Sun December 13 2009, Joe wrote:
You can split the task of testing if you have the use of an external
Internet connection, possibly over ssh: you can connect to your own
server by IP address or by name using telnet. Apologies for the source
of this, but it's what I
on dyndns, I want to host my dyndns domain
on my laptop, just to setup test my own email server. I want to host my
REAL domain at home, on my Debian Desktop. but I want to GET IT RIGHT
before I mess up my domain emails...
Now that's just plain silly. Really. If you want a reliable mail
setup
On Sun December 13 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I've received spam to my inbox from all the ranges below. Liquid Web
has 8 ranges assigned by ARIN, and I've received spam from four of them.
I don't f*ck around when it comes to spam coming from no-name web
hosting companies. I usually smtp
On Sun December 13 2009, Joe wrote:
Had you, as a human, tried the suggested address, it would have reached
me. I accept mail to it and abuse unconditionally, as required by RFC.
not sure I understand what you are saying here..
More likely is that nearly all spam is now NDR spam, which
On Sun December 13 2009, Joe wrote:
In addition to the blacklist, I reject about twenty countries on HELO
and PTR strings, a few really offensive ISPs by name (mostly German,
oddly), and make an attempt to identify and reject 'generic' PTRs. Along
with the Debian default of requiring
Thank You for Your time and answer, Sjoerd:
Well, on a properly configured server, viruses shouldn't be a problem.
As long as you are not running strange software on that server or open
strange attachments there, that is. And then of course there are not
that many Linux-viruses around
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:26:05AM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Sjoerd:
Well, on a properly configured server, viruses shouldn't be a problem.
As long as you are not running strange software on that server or open
strange attachments there, that is. And
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
I think ClamAV should run as clamav user, not root and the same
remains for many other services that use their own user.
I think the same. But! In Debian all/most the mail-related services are run
under the root user... I was asking here how I
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:13:17 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
I think ClamAV should run as clamav user, not root and the same
remains for many other services that use their own user.
I think the same. But! In Debian all/most the mail-related services
Sthu Deus schreef:
I think ClamAV should run as clamav user, not root and the same
remains for many other services that use their own user.
I think the same. But! In Debian all/most the mail-related services are run
under the root user... I was asking here how I can change it - seems nobody
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Sthu Deus wrote:
I think ClamAV should run as clamav user, not root and the same
remains for many other services that use their own user.
I think the same. But! In Debian all/most the mail-related services are
run under the root user... I was asking here how I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Of course, your linux server does not need an antivirus to protect
itself, but to prevent your users to be infected. And remember that by
centralizing the anti-malware checking in one point (your e-mail server)
you are saving not just resources,
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Nick Douma wrote:
Have you ever heard of any Windows AV that filters *outgoing* email?
Actually, most that I know do. At work, NOD32 integrates with Outlook
and Thunderbird, and scans everything, even already delivered mail. I'm
not sure if that last feature is really
of magnitude
faster than spamassassin for signature-based rules.
their machines) - the every letter they get? - What does clamav protects:
the email server or the end user (at its own machine)?
Depends on how you use it. I don't know anyone who uses clamav to protect
the server, you protect an Unix
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009, Sthu Deus wrote:
Personally, I do not trust the local network I have the deal with - much
more than the Internet... So, for me it is much better to protect the
server - to let it working as it should providing its services rather than
try to explain the people the
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
In what way removing clamav you are closing a potencial security
hole? :-?
My worries come from the fact that many email-related services are run w/ root
privileges - therefore, if a security issue occurs - there is not problem to
compromise
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:35:16 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
In what way removing clamav you are closing a potencial security
hole? :-?
My worries come from the fact that many email-related services are run
w/ root privileges - therefore, if a
Thank You for Your time and answer, Jesús:
By removing your server's MTA and let the end users to deal with mail
transfer
you'll certainly close another one so your point is, again?
Not that. I just suppose that removing clamav will close one porential security
hole. MTA I would remain.
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
No, but it help your users to decrease the amount of code with unsafe
data at a very low prize for your server performance or security ;-)
My worries come from the fact that many email-related services are run w/ root
privileges - therefore, if a
Thank You for Your time and answer, Jochen:
What's worse: the mail server being taken over by an attacker, or
several workstations at once?
Personally, I do not trust the local network I have the deal with - much more
than the Internet... So, for me it is much better to protect the server -
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:12:53 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
No, but it help your users to decrease the amount of code with unsafe
data at a very low prize for your server performance or security ;-)
My worries come from the fact that many
On Thursday 03 December 2009 20:07:14 Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Jesús:
By removing your server's MTA and let the end users to deal with mail
transfer you'll certainly close another one so your point is, again?
Not that. I just suppose that removing clamav will
On Thursday 03 December 2009 02:12 pm, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
No, but it help your users to decrease the amount of code with unsafe
data at a very low prize for your server performance or security ;-)
My worries come from the fact that many
at their machines) - the every
letter they get? - What does clamav protects: the email server or the end user
(at its own machine)?
PS I want to remove it because I suppose that in case clamav blesses users'
life and not server's - by removing clamav I can close one potential security
whole
drop it to the end users (to be checked at
their machines) - the every letter they get? - What does clamav
protects: the email server or the end user (at its own machine)?
I'd add clamav as a first virus barrier to protect end-users.
Viruses will not hurt the (linux) server but having clamav
Camaleón:
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:38:43 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
PS I want to remove it because I suppose that in case clamav blesses
users' life and not server's - by removing clamav I can close one
potential security whole.
In what way removing clamav you are closing a potencial security
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:51:18 +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:38:43 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
PS I want to remove it because I suppose that in case clamav blesses
users' life and not server's - by removing clamav I can close one
potential security whole.
In
Camaleón:
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:51:18 +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:38:43 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
PS I want to remove it because I suppose that in case clamav blesses
users' life and not server's - by removing clamav I can close one
potential security
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:34:16 +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
In what way removing clamav you are closing a potencial security
hole? :-?
http://www.google.com/search?q=clamav+exploit
Oh, sure.
But you can then change the query by:
server -
No.
as it protests
the server OR I can easily drop it to the end users (to be checked at their
machines) - the every letter they get? -
Yes, you can.
What does clamav protects: the
email server or the end user (at its own machine)?
Neither one. It just tag and (possible) strip out
Hi,
I want to set up a local LAN-side email server that provides POP3 and
IMAP for multiple accounts - the MUA is usually Firefox, both Windows
and Linux.
The source of the emails is from multiple POP3/IMAP accounts.
Reading some of the zillion and one HOWTOs out there is complicating
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 06:29:44PM +0100, marc wrote:
I want to set up a local LAN-side email server that provides POP3 and
IMAP for multiple accounts - the MUA is usually Firefox, both Windows
and Linux.
No, it isn't. Firefox isn't a mail client.
Maybe you mean Mozilla Thunderbird
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
